Literature DB >> 33155126

Uncertainty modulates value-driven attentional capture.

Sang A Cho1, Yang Seok Cho2.   

Abstract

The majority of previous studies on the value modulation of attention have shown that the magnitude of value-driven attentional bias correlates with the strength of reward association. However, relatively little is known about how uncertainty affects value-based attentional bias. We investigated whether attentional capture by previously rewarded stimuli is modulated by the uncertainty of the learned value without the influence of the strength of reward association. Participants were instructed to identify the line orientation in the target color circle. Importantly, each target color was associated with a different level of uncertainty by tuning the variation in reward delivery (Experiment 1) or reward magnitude (Experiment 2). Attentional interference for uncertainty-related distractors was greater than that for certainty distractors in Experiments 1 and 2. In addition, uncertainty-induced attentional bias disappeared earlier than attentional bias for certainty. The study demonstrated that uncertainty modulates value-based attentional capture in terms of strength and persistence, even when the effect of expected value remains constant.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention: selective; Attentional capture; Visual search

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33155126     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-020-02171-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  25 in total

Review 1.  Context, ambiguity, and unlearning: sources of relapse after behavioral extinction.

Authors:  Mark E Bouton
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 13.382

2.  Discrete coding of reward probability and uncertainty by dopamine neurons.

Authors:  Christopher D Fiorillo; Philippe N Tobler; Wolfram Schultz
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-03-21       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings.

Authors:  C L Folk; R W Remington; J C Johnston
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Automatic versus Choice-Dependent Value Representations in the Human Brain.

Authors:  Marcus Grueschow; Rafael Polania; Todd A Hare; Christian C Ruff
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 5.  Rewards teach visual selective attention.

Authors:  Leonardo Chelazzi; Andrea Perlato; Elisa Santandrea; Chiara Della Libera
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Exogenous visual orienting by reward.

Authors:  Michel F Failing; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Rewarded visual items capture attention only in heterogeneous contexts.

Authors:  Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld; Ruben Brandhofer; Anna Schubö
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Attention, learning, and the value of information.

Authors:  Jacqueline Gottlieb
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 9.  Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy.

Authors:  Edward Awh; Artem V Belopolsky; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Reward predictions bias attentional selection.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Patryk A Laurent; Steven Yantis
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.