PURPOSE: We explore the advantages of using a double-ring radiofrequency (RF) array and slice orientation to design parallel transmission (pTx) multiband (MB) pulses for simultaneous multislice (SMS) imaging with whole-brain coverage at 7 Tesla (T). METHODS: A double-ring head array with 16 elements split evenly in two rings stacked in the z-direction was modeled and compared with two single-ring arrays consisting of 8 or 16 elements. The array performance was evaluated by designing band-specific pTx MB pulses with local specific absorption rate (SAR) control. The impact of slice orientations was also investigated. RESULTS: The double-ring array consistently and significantly outperformed the other two single-ring arrays, with peak local SAR reduced by up to 40% at a fixed excitation error of 0.024. For all three arrays, exciting sagittal or coronal slices yielded better RF performance than exciting axial or oblique slices. CONCLUSIONS: A double-ring RF array can be used to drastically improve SAR versus excitation fidelity tradeoff for pTx MB pulse design for brain imaging at 7 T; therefore, it is preferable against single-ring RF array designs when pursuing various biomedical applications of pTx SMS imaging. In comparing the stripline arrays, coronal and sagittal slices are more advantageous than axial and oblique slices for pTx MB pulses. Magn Reson Med 75:2464-2472, 2016.
PURPOSE: We explore the advantages of using a double-ring radiofrequency (RF) array and slice orientation to design parallel transmission (pTx) multiband (MB) pulses for simultaneous multislice (SMS) imaging with whole-brain coverage at 7 Tesla (T). METHODS: A double-ring head array with 16 elements split evenly in two rings stacked in the z-direction was modeled and compared with two single-ring arrays consisting of 8 or 16 elements. The array performance was evaluated by designing band-specific pTxMB pulses with local specific absorption rate (SAR) control. The impact of slice orientations was also investigated. RESULTS: The double-ring array consistently and significantly outperformed the other two single-ring arrays, with peak local SAR reduced by up to 40% at a fixed excitation error of 0.024. For all three arrays, exciting sagittal or coronal slices yielded better RF performance than exciting axial or oblique slices. CONCLUSIONS: A double-ring RF array can be used to drastically improve SAR versus excitation fidelity tradeoff for pTxMB pulse design for brain imaging at 7 T; therefore, it is preferable against single-ring RF array designs when pursuing various biomedical applications of pTxSMS imaging. In comparing the stripline arrays, coronal and sagittal slices are more advantageous than axial and oblique slices for pTxMB pulses. Magn Reson Med 75:2464-2472, 2016.
Authors: Gregor Adriany; Pierre-Francois Van de Moortele; Florian Wiesinger; Steen Moeller; John P Strupp; Peter Andersen; Carl Snyder; Xiaoliang Zhang; Wei Chen; Klaas P Pruessmann; Peter Boesiger; Tommy Vaughan; Kāmil Uğurbil Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: K Setsompop; R Kimmlingen; E Eberlein; T Witzel; J Cohen-Adad; J A McNab; B Keil; M D Tisdall; P Hoecht; P Dietz; S F Cauley; V Tountcheva; V Matschl; V H Lenz; K Heberlein; A Potthast; H Thein; J Van Horn; A Toga; F Schmitt; D Lehne; B R Rosen; V Wedeen; L L Wald Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2013-05-24 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Xiaoping Wu; Sebastian Schmitter; Edward J Auerbach; Steen Moeller; Kâmil Uğurbil; Pierre-François Van de Moortele Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2013-06-25 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Steen Moeller; Essa Yacoub; Cheryl A Olman; Edward Auerbach; John Strupp; Noam Harel; Kâmil Uğurbil Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Bastien Guérin; Kawin Setsompop; Huihui Ye; Benedikt A Poser; Andrew V Stenger; Lawrence L Wald Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2014-06-17 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Adam C Zelinski; Leonardo M Angelone; Vivek K Goyal; Giorgio Bonmassar; Elfar Adalsteinsson; Lawrence L Wald Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Benedikt A Poser; Robert James Anderson; Bastien Guérin; Kawin Setsompop; Weiran Deng; Azma Mareyam; Peter Serano; Lawrence L Wald; V Andrew Stenger Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2013-05-28 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Kamil Uğurbil; Edward Auerbach; Steen Moeller; Andrea Grant; Xiaoping Wu; Pierre-Francois Van de Moortele; Cheryl Olman; Lance DelaBarre; Scott Schillak; Jerahmie Radder; Russell Lagore; Gregor Adriany Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2019-02-25 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Xiaoping Wu; Edward J Auerbach; An T Vu; Steen Moeller; Pierre-François Van de Moortele; Essa Yacoub; Kâmil Uğurbil Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2018-09-17 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: M Arcan Ertürk; Xiaoping Wu; Yiğitcan Eryaman; Pierre-François Van de Moortele; Edward J Auerbach; Russell L Lagore; Lance DelaBarre; J Thomas Vaughan; Kâmil Uğurbil; Gregor Adriany; Gregory J Metzger Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2016-10-21 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Xiaoping Wu; Edward J Auerbach; An T Vu; Steen Moeller; Christophe Lenglet; Sebastian Schmitter; Pierre-François Van de Moortele; Essa Yacoub; Kâmil Uğurbil Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2018-03-30 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Navid P Gandji; Christopher T Sica; Michael T Lanagan; Myung-Kyun Woo; Lance DelaBarre; Jerahmie Radder; Bei Zhang; Riccardo Lattanzi; Gregor Adriany; Kamil Ugurbil; Qing X Yang Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2021-07-17 Impact factor: 3.737