Literature DB >> 26992829

Distribution of donor lungs in the United States: a case for broader geographic sharing.

Alexander Iribarne1, David O Meltzer2,3, Dhaval Chauhan4, Joshua R Sonett5, Robert D Gibbons2, Wickii Vigneswaran6, Mark J Russo4,7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association between allocation of donor lungs by geographic sharing type (GST) and lung allocation score (LAS).
METHODS: UNOS data included lung transplant recipients between 5/4/05 and 09/30/15 (n = 17 416) grouped by GST of donor lungs: local, regional, or national. Recipients were stratified by LAS <50, 50-75, and >75. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess five-yr survival.
RESULTS: The majority of lungs were shared locally (n = 9200; 52.8%) followed by nationally (n = 5356; 30.8%) and regionally (n = 2860; 16.4%). There was a significant difference in the mean LAS at transplant (local: 43.7 ± 15; regional: 49.5 ± 18.8; national 51 ± 19.4; p < 0.001). There was a significant association between GST and LAS (p < 0.001). The majority (n = 7431; 58.2%) of recipients with LAS <50 received local lungs. Recipients with LAS >75 received a majority of their organs from national (n = 881; 45.4%) and regional (n = 414; 21.6%) donors. Although statistically significant (p = 0.024), absolute decline in five-yr survival by GST in the national GST was only 1.1% compared to the local GST.
CONCLUSIONS: Nearly half of all lungs in the United States are allocated locally to recipients with an LAS <50. Additional studies should determine if organ sharing over broader geographies would improve waitlist outcomes.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  United States; donor lung; geographical distribution; lung allocation score; lung transplant

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26992829     DOI: 10.1111/ctr.12735

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transplant        ISSN: 0902-0063            Impact factor:   2.863


  5 in total

1.  Geographic disparities in lung transplant rates.

Authors:  Martin Kosztowski; Sheng Zhou; Errol Bush; Robert S Higgins; Dorry L Segev; Sommer E Gentry
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2018-12-15       Impact factor: 8.086

2.  Contemporary Issues in Lung Transplant Allocation Practices.

Authors:  Wayne M Tsuang
Journal:  Curr Transplant Rep       Date:  2017-07-21

3.  Effect of broader geographic sharing of donor lungs on lung transplant waitlist outcomes.

Authors:  Joshua J Mooney; Jay Bhattacharya; Gundeep S Dhillon
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 10.247

4.  Geographic disparities in lung transplantation in the United States before and after the November 2017 allocation change.

Authors:  Luke J Benvenuto; Michaela R Anderson; Meghan Aversa; Mark E Snyder; Hilary Robbins; Lori Shah; Harpreet Singh Grewal; David Anderson; Joseph Costa; Brian P Stanifer; Philippe Lemaitre; Joshua R Sonett; Frank D'Ovidio; Selim M Arcasoy
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 13.569

Review 5.  The new allocation era and policy.

Authors:  Luke J Benvenuto; Selim M Arcasoy
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 2.895

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.