Literature DB >> 26987590

Glaucoma detection with damato multifixation campimetry online.

A S Olsen1,2, M Alberti1, L Serup3, M la Cour1, B Damato4, M Kolko2,5,6.   

Abstract

PurposeTo evaluate Damato Multifixation Campimetry Online (DMCO), a free-of-charge internet-based visual field test. DMCO exists in three versions: DMCO BASIC, DMCO STANDARD, and DMCO ADVANCED. The main focus was (i) to investigate the sensitivity and the specificity of the existing DMCO versions in the detection of glaucomatous visual field loss and (ii) to define and evaluate algorithms for the interpretation of DMCO results.MethodsThe study design was an evaluation of a diagnostic test and included 97 individuals performing DMCO and white-on-white perimetry. Interpretation algorithms were devised to define abnormality, and these were evaluated using the Glaucoma Staging System as gold standard. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the ROC (AUC) were calculated.ResultsAUCs from 15 algorithms ranged from 0.79 to 0.90. The most promising algorithm combined results from two successive DMCO STANDARD tests. The sensitivity was highly dependent on the severity of glaucoma. Hence, for eyes with mild, moderate, advanced, and severe glaucoma, the DMCO test demonstrated a sensitivity of 11.8, 71.4, 100, and 100%, respectively. The specificity was as high as 98.1%. Median duration per eye to complete the DMCO STANDARD test was 86 s for the control group and 125 s in participants with glaucoma.ConclusionsDMCO shows promise as a free-of-charge online tool to identify glaucomatous visual field defects in a preselected population. Ongoing studies are evaluating the use of DMCO in a nonselected population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26987590      PMCID: PMC4869138          DOI: 10.1038/eye.2016.25

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  33 in total

1.  Can the specificity of the FDT for glaucoma be improved by confirming abnormal results?

Authors:  J J Khong; P N Dimitrov; J Rait; C A McCarty
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Comparison of Damato campimetry and Humphrey automated perimetry results in a clinical population.

Authors:  Fiona J Rowe; Henri Sueke; Sandra D Gawley
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Evaluation of oculokinetic perimetry.

Authors:  W L Chia; I Goldberg; A Bauman
Journal:  Aust N Z J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-10

4.  Screening for glaucoma with frequency-doubling technology and Damato campimetry.

Authors:  N Yamada; P P Chen; R P Mills; M M Leen; M F Lieberman; R L Stamper; D C Stanford
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-11

5.  Screening for glaucoma in a general population with the non-mydriatic fundus camera and the frequency doubling perimeter.

Authors:  M Detry-Morel; T Zeyen; P Kestelyn; J Collignon; M Goethals
Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.597

6.  Evaluating a visual field screening test for glaucoma: how the choice of the gold standard affects the validity of the test.

Authors:  N J Ellish; E J Higginbotham
Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.648

7.  The nasal step in normal and glaucomatous visual fields.

Authors:  M Zingirian; G Calabria; E Gandolfo
Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 1.882

8.  Multifixation campimetry on line: a perimeter for the detection of visual field loss using the internet.

Authors:  B Damato; C Groenewald
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies.

Authors:  Patrick M Bossuyt; Johannes B Reitsma; David E Bruns; Constantine A Gatsonis; Paul P Glasziou; Les Irwig; Jeroen G Lijmer; David Moher; Drummond Rennie; Henrica C W de Vet; Herbert Y Kressel; Nader Rifai; Robert M Golub; Douglas G Altman; Lotty Hooft; Daniël A Korevaar; Jérémie F Cohen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Cost-effectiveness of screening for open angle glaucoma in developed countries.

Authors:  Anja Tuulonen
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.848

View more
  2 in total

1.  Pattern noise (PANO): a new automated functional glaucoma test.

Authors:  Sylvain El-Khoury; Thomas Hannen; Diana Carmen Dragnea; Faustin Ngounou; Paul-Rolf Preußner
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Comparison of the Automated Pattern-Noise (PANO) Glaucoma Test with the HFA, an FDT Stimulus, and the Fundus Area Cup-to-disk Ratio.

Authors:  Thomas Hannen; Sylvain El-Khoury; Rajesh Patel; Faustin Ngounou; Paul-Rolf Preußner
Journal:  J Curr Glaucoma Pract       Date:  2021 Sep-Dec
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.