Literature DB >> 28815393

Pattern noise (PANO): a new automated functional glaucoma test.

Sylvain El-Khoury1, Thomas Hannen2, Diana Carmen Dragnea2, Faustin Ngounou3, Paul-Rolf Preußner2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To present a newly developed visual field device (pattern noise: PANO) designed to be sensitive to glaucoma defects, cost-effective, material-practical and easy to repair and therefore particularly suited for low-income countries, where glaucoma can be highly prevalent (e.g. sub-Saharan Africa).
METHODS: This is primarily a descriptive paper, but it also includes a prospective matched case-control pilot study. Hardware, stimulus, target configuration, testing strategy and result sheet are described. The main outcome measure is the contrast level (range 2-64). Targets are composed of bright/dark pixels flickering with 18 Hz and have a size of 5°. Pixel size is approximated to the hill of vision. Average luminance of targets is constant and equals background luminance.The study was performed in the West Region in Cameroon. Twenty eyes of 20 newly presenting patients with glaucomatous optic disc cupping on funduscopy were compared with 20 eyes of 20 normal patients matched in age and laterality of eye.
RESULTS: Mean age was 32.9 ± 18.8 years for glaucoma patients and 32.2 ± 15.6 years for healthy subjects. Mean contrast threshold was significantly higher in eyes with abnormal disc (16.2 ± 14.3 vs. 4.4 ± 0.8, P = 0.002). Correlation of mean contrast thresholds and cup-to-disc ratio was significant (r = 0.59; P = 0.006). Average examination time was significantly longer for glaucoma eyes compared to healthy eyes (8.2 vs. 6.1 min, P < 0.001), whereas error rate did not differ (4.8 ± 2.5% vs. 4.1 ± 1.8%, P = 0.33).
CONCLUSION: PANO demonstrated visual field defects in patients with glaucomatous optic disc. Defects correlated significantly with glaucomatous optic nerve head morphological alterations. Healthy eyes obtained normal results. More studies are needed to establish PANO.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Glaucoma; Healthcare research; Visual field

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28815393     DOI: 10.1007/s10792-017-0690-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0165-5701            Impact factor:   2.031


  28 in total

1.  Standard for pattern electroretinography. International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision.

Authors:  M Bach; M Hawlina; G E Holder; M F Marmor; T Meigen; Y Miyake
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  THE BJERRUM SCOTOMA.

Authors:  D O HARRINGTON
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1964

3.  Visual field defects in early open angle glaucoma.

Authors:  M F Armaly
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1971

4.  The influence of learning effect on frequency doubling technology perimetry (Matrix).

Authors:  Maria Teresa Contestabile; Andrea Perdicchi; Stefano Amodeo; Vincenzo Recupero; Santi Maria Recupero
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Frequency doubling technology perimetry using a 24--2 stimulus presentation pattern.

Authors:  C A Johnson; G A Cioffi; E M Van Buskirk
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Glaucoma screening in Western Cameroon.

Authors:  Paul-Rolf Preussner; Allegra Grossmann; Faustin Ngounou; Gabriel Kouogan; James Tamon
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-08-23       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020.

Authors:  H A Quigley; A T Broman
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Structural and Functional Progression in the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial.

Authors:  HannaMaria Öhnell; Anders Heijl; Lena Brenner; Harald Anderson; Boel Bengtsson
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  An assessment of the iPad as a testing platform for distance visual acuity in adults.

Authors:  J M Black; R J Jacobs; G Phillips; L Chen; E Tan; A Tran; B Thompson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Optimisation and assessment of three modern touch screen tablet computers for clinical vision testing.

Authors:  Humza J Tahir; Ian J Murray; Neil R A Parry; Tariq M Aslam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of the Automated Pattern-Noise (PANO) Glaucoma Test with the HFA, an FDT Stimulus, and the Fundus Area Cup-to-disk Ratio.

Authors:  Thomas Hannen; Sylvain El-Khoury; Rajesh Patel; Faustin Ngounou; Paul-Rolf Preußner
Journal:  J Curr Glaucoma Pract       Date:  2021 Sep-Dec
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.