Literature DB >> 26984335

Anterior cruciate ligament assessment using arthrometry and stress imaging.

Eric M Rohman1, Jeffrey A Macalena2.   

Abstract

Arthrometry and stress imaging are useful clinical tools for the objective assessment of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) integrity. They are most frequently used for the diagnosis of a complete ACL tear when other workup is equivocal, in conjunction with history and clinical exam findings. Other applications include the diagnosis of partial ACL tears, injury prognosis, and post-operative monitoring. However, further studies are needed to validate these uses. Many different devices and techniques exist for objective examination, which have been compared in recent literature. Reliability and validity measures of these methods vary, and often depend upon examiner familiarity and skill. The KT series of devices is the current gold standard for arthrometry, although the newer robotic GNRB device shows promising early results. Newer methods of data interpretation have been developed for stress imaging, and portable technology may impact this field further.

Keywords:  ACL; Arthrometry; Injury; Knee; Sports medicine; Stress imaging

Year:  2016        PMID: 26984335      PMCID: PMC4896874          DOI: 10.1007/s12178-016-9331-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med        ISSN: 1935-9748


  97 in total

1.  The role of the Rolimeter in quantifying knee instability compared to the functional outcome of ACL-reconstructed versus conservatively-treated knees.

Authors:  V Pollet; D Barrat; E Meirhaeghe; P Vaes; F Handelberg
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2004-06-19       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Instrumented evaluation of knee laxity: a comparison of five arthrometers.

Authors:  A F Anderson; R B Snyder; C F Federspiel; A B Lipscomb
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 3.  Current concepts in instrumented knee-laxity testing.

Authors:  Luke Pugh; Randy Mascarenhas; Shalinder Arneja; Patrick Y K Chin; Jordan M Leith
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Evaluation of an electrogoniometric instrument for measurement of laxity of the knee.

Authors:  W M Granberry; P C Noble; G W Woods
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Instrumented measurement of anterior laxity of the knee.

Authors:  D M Daniel; L L Malcom; G Losse; M L Stone; R Sachs; R Burks
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  In vivo knee stability. A quantitative assessment using an instrumented clinical testing apparatus.

Authors:  K L Markolf; A Graff-Radford; H C Amstutz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Assessment of rotatory laxity in anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees using magnetic resonance imaging with Porto-knee testing device.

Authors:  João Espregueira-Mendes; Hélder Pereira; Nuno Sevivas; Cláudia Passos; José C Vasconcelos; Alberto Monteiro; Joaquim M Oliveira; Rui L Reis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Stress radiography in acute ligamentous injuries of the knee.

Authors:  I B McPhee; J G Fraser
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 2.586

9.  Radiological assessment of anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. A new technique.

Authors:  G J Hooper
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1986-03

10.  Anterior knee laxity measurement: comparison of passive stress radiographs Telos(®) and "Lerat", and GNRB(®) arthrometer.

Authors:  J Beldame; S Mouchel; S Bertiaux; J-M Adam; F Mouilhade; X Roussignol; F Dujardin
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 2.256

View more
  8 in total

1.  Global rotation has high sensitivity in ACL lesions within stress MRI.

Authors:  João Espregueira-Mendes; Renato Andrade; Ana Leal; Hélder Pereira; Abdala Skaf; Sérgio Rodrigues-Gomes; J Miguel Oliveira; Rui L Reis; Rogério Pereira
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Selective bundle versus complete anterior-cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mark Hx Yeo; Shawn Js Seah; Cheryl Gatot; Andy Yew; Denny Lie
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-07-31

3.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with an all-epiphyseal "over-the-top" technique is safe and shows low rate of failure in skeletally immature athletes.

Authors:  Tommaso Roberti di Sarsina; Luca Macchiarola; Cecilia Signorelli; Alberto Grassi; Federico Raggi; Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli; Stefano Zaffagnini
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Evaluation of reproducibility of robotic knee testing device (GNRB) on 60 healthy knees.

Authors:  Dany Mouarbes; Etienne Cavaignac; Philippe Chiron; Emilie Bérard; Jérôme Murgier
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-01-30

5.  Validity of the Genourob arthrometer in the evaluation of total thickness tears of anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Anthony Saravia; Sebastián Cabrera; Claudio R Molina; Loreto Pacheco; Gabriel Muñoz
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-03-26

6.  Prognostic Factors for Patient-Reported Outcomes at 32 to 37 Years After Surgical or Nonsurgical Management of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury.

Authors:  Stephanie Filbay; Christer Andersson; Håkan Gauffin; Joanna Kvist
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-08-11

7.  Effects of Deficits in the Neuromuscular and Mechanical Properties of the Quadriceps and Hamstrings on Single-Leg Hop Performance and Dynamic Knee Stability in Patients After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Xin He; Jihong Qiu; Mingde Cao; Yui Chung Ho; Hio Teng Leong; Sai-Chuen Fu; Michael Tim-Yun Ong; Daniel T P Fong; Patrick Shu-Hang Yung
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-01-04

8.  Clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament injury: panther symposium ACL injury clinical outcomes consensus group.

Authors:  Eleonor Svantesson; Eric Hamrin Senorski; Kate E Webster; Jón Karlsson; Theresa Diermeier; Benjamin B Rothrauff; Sean J Meredith; Thomas Rauer; James J Irrgang; Kurt P Spindler; C Benjamin Ma; Volker Musahl
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 4.342

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.