Tommaso Roberti di Sarsina1,2,3, Luca Macchiarola4,5,6, Cecilia Signorelli2, Alberto Grassi1,2,3, Federico Raggi1,2,3, Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli1,2,3, Stefano Zaffagnini1,2,3. 1. Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica II, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via C. Pupilli 1, 40136, Bologna, BO, Italy. 2. Laboratorio di Biomeccanica e Innovazione Tecnologica, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Di Barbiano 1/10, Bologna, BO, Italy. 3. Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche e NeuroMotorie DIBINEM, Università di Bologna, Via U. Foscolo 7, Bologna, BO, Italy. 4. Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica II, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via C. Pupilli 1, 40136, Bologna, BO, Italy. luca.macchiarola@hotmail.it. 5. Laboratorio di Biomeccanica e Innovazione Tecnologica, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Di Barbiano 1/10, Bologna, BO, Italy. luca.macchiarola@hotmail.it. 6. Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche e NeuroMotorie DIBINEM, Università di Bologna, Via U. Foscolo 7, Bologna, BO, Italy. luca.macchiarola@hotmail.it.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to follow up, clinically and radiographically, skeletally immature patients who underwent ACL reconstruction with an all-epiphyseal "over-the-top" technique. METHODS: Twenty athletes aged between 8 and 13 years were enrolled and retrospectively evaluated. The subjects underwent surgical ACL reconstruction between 2009 and 2013. The surgical technique consisted of a single-bundle all-epiphyseal ACL reconstruction with an extra-articular lateral tenodesis. The mean follow-up was 54 months [34-123] after surgery. Clinically, the patients were evaluated pre- and post-operatively with Lysholm and KOOS scores; sport activity level was evaluated using the pre-injury, pre-operative and post-operative Tegner scores. Objective IKDC was calculated post-operatively. The joint laxity was evaluated by KT1000 and Rolimeter arthrometers. Panoramic AP standing radiographs of the lower limbs and lateral knee radiographs were also taken at the follow-up to evaluate limb length discrepancies (LLD) and axial malalignment. Normally distributed parameters were presented as mean ± standard deviation, while the non-normally distributed parameters were presented as median [25° percentile, 75° percentile]. RESULTS: Clinical scores showed significant (P < 0.01) improvement: Lysholm and KOOS scores improved from 40 [22; 65] and 59 [42, 73], respectively, to 100 [95; 100] and 99 [97;100] after surgery. Tegner score improved from 2 [2; 2] pre-operatively to 7 [3; 9] at follow-up (P < 0.01). At follow-up, IKDC score was A for 19 patients and one who scored B. All patients returned to sport activity and had good stability at follow-up: the KT1000 showed a median side-to-side difference of 0.0 mm [- 0.4; 1.0] for the standard force evaluation and 0.0 mm [- 1.0; 0.8] for manual-maximum test. The Rolimeter showed median side-to-site difference of 0.0 mm [- 1.0; 0.8]. Three minor leg length discrepancies and axial deviations were observed at the radiograph: one patient had 0.6 cm lengthening and 4° of varus, one had 1 cm lengthening, and one had 3° of varus (in comparison with the non-operated limb). No re-injury was observed. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the modified all-epiphyseal single-bundle "over-the-top" technique is a viable and safe option for ACL reconstruction in pediatric subjects. These results support once more that not only ACL reconstruction is a safe procedure in skeletally immature patients, but also it is highly recommended for those who want to pursue an active and sportive life. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case series, IV.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to follow up, clinically and radiographically, skeletally immature patients who underwent ACL reconstruction with an all-epiphyseal "over-the-top" technique. METHODS: Twenty athletes aged between 8 and 13 years were enrolled and retrospectively evaluated. The subjects underwent surgical ACL reconstruction between 2009 and 2013. The surgical technique consisted of a single-bundle all-epiphyseal ACL reconstruction with an extra-articular lateral tenodesis. The mean follow-up was 54 months [34-123] after surgery. Clinically, the patients were evaluated pre- and post-operatively with Lysholm and KOOS scores; sport activity level was evaluated using the pre-injury, pre-operative and post-operative Tegner scores. Objective IKDC was calculated post-operatively. The joint laxity was evaluated by KT1000 and Rolimeter arthrometers. Panoramic AP standing radiographs of the lower limbs and lateral knee radiographs were also taken at the follow-up to evaluate limb length discrepancies (LLD) and axial malalignment. Normally distributed parameters were presented as mean ± standard deviation, while the non-normally distributed parameters were presented as median [25° percentile, 75° percentile]. RESULTS: Clinical scores showed significant (P < 0.01) improvement: Lysholm and KOOS scores improved from 40 [22; 65] and 59 [42, 73], respectively, to 100 [95; 100] and 99 [97;100] after surgery. Tegner score improved from 2 [2; 2] pre-operatively to 7 [3; 9] at follow-up (P < 0.01). At follow-up, IKDC score was A for 19 patients and one who scored B. All patients returned to sport activity and had good stability at follow-up: the KT1000 showed a median side-to-side difference of 0.0 mm [- 0.4; 1.0] for the standard force evaluation and 0.0 mm [- 1.0; 0.8] for manual-maximum test. The Rolimeter showed median side-to-site difference of 0.0 mm [- 1.0; 0.8]. Three minor leg length discrepancies and axial deviations were observed at the radiograph: one patient had 0.6 cm lengthening and 4° of varus, one had 1 cm lengthening, and one had 3° of varus (in comparison with the non-operated limb). No re-injury was observed. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the modified all-epiphyseal single-bundle "over-the-top" technique is a viable and safe option for ACL reconstruction in pediatric subjects. These results support once more that not only ACL reconstruction is a safe procedure in skeletally immature patients, but also it is highly recommended for those who want to pursue an active and sportive life. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case series, IV.
Authors: Peter D Fabricant; Kristofer J Jones; Demetris Delos; Frank A Cordasco; Robert G Marx; Andrew D Pearle; Russell F Warren; Daniel W Green Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2013-03-06 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Mette K Zebis; Susan Warming; Maria B Pedersen; Marie H Kraft; S Peter Magnusson; Martin Rathcke; Michael Krogsgaard; Simon Døssing; Tine Alkjær Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2019-07-30
Authors: Alberto Grassi; Luca Macchiarola; Gian Andrea Lucidi; Giacomo Dal Fabbro; Massimilano Mosca; Silvio Caravelli; Stefano Zaffagnini Journal: Sports Health Date: 2021-05-26 Impact factor: 4.355
Authors: Gregorio Marchiori; Giorgio Cassiolas; Matteo Berni; Alberto Grassi; Giacomo Dal Fabbro; Milena Fini; Giuseppe Filardo; Stefano Zaffagnini; Nicola Francesco Lopomo Journal: Life (Basel) Date: 2021-12-10