Literature DB >> 30209520

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with an all-epiphyseal "over-the-top" technique is safe and shows low rate of failure in skeletally immature athletes.

Tommaso Roberti di Sarsina1,2,3, Luca Macchiarola4,5,6, Cecilia Signorelli2, Alberto Grassi1,2,3, Federico Raggi1,2,3, Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli1,2,3, Stefano Zaffagnini1,2,3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to follow up, clinically and radiographically, skeletally immature patients who underwent ACL reconstruction with an all-epiphyseal "over-the-top" technique.
METHODS: Twenty athletes aged between 8 and 13 years were enrolled and retrospectively evaluated. The subjects underwent surgical ACL reconstruction between 2009 and 2013. The surgical technique consisted of a single-bundle all-epiphyseal ACL reconstruction with an extra-articular lateral tenodesis. The mean follow-up was 54 months [34-123] after surgery. Clinically, the patients were evaluated pre- and post-operatively with Lysholm and KOOS scores; sport activity level was evaluated using the pre-injury, pre-operative and post-operative Tegner scores. Objective IKDC was calculated post-operatively. The joint laxity was evaluated by KT1000 and Rolimeter arthrometers. Panoramic AP standing radiographs of the lower limbs and lateral knee radiographs were also taken at the follow-up to evaluate limb length discrepancies (LLD) and axial malalignment. Normally distributed parameters were presented as mean ± standard deviation, while the non-normally distributed parameters were presented as median [25° percentile, 75° percentile].
RESULTS: Clinical scores showed significant (P < 0.01) improvement: Lysholm and KOOS scores improved from 40 [22; 65] and 59 [42, 73], respectively, to 100 [95; 100] and 99 [97;100] after surgery. Tegner score improved from 2 [2; 2] pre-operatively to 7 [3; 9] at follow-up (P < 0.01). At follow-up, IKDC score was A for 19 patients and one who scored B. All patients returned to sport activity and had good stability at follow-up: the KT1000 showed a median side-to-side difference of 0.0 mm [- 0.4; 1.0] for the standard force evaluation and 0.0 mm [- 1.0; 0.8] for manual-maximum test. The Rolimeter showed median side-to-site difference of 0.0 mm [- 1.0; 0.8]. Three minor leg length discrepancies and axial deviations were observed at the radiograph: one patient had 0.6 cm lengthening and 4° of varus, one had 1 cm lengthening, and one had 3° of varus (in comparison with the non-operated limb). No re-injury was observed.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the modified all-epiphyseal single-bundle "over-the-top" technique is a viable and safe option for ACL reconstruction in pediatric subjects. These results support once more that not only ACL reconstruction is a safe procedure in skeletally immature patients, but also it is highly recommended for those who want to pursue an active and sportive life. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case series, IV.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL reconstruction; Adolescents; Anterior cruciate ligament; Growth disturbances; Laxity; Skeletally immature

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30209520     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-018-5132-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  37 in total

Review 1.  Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in the skeletally immature athlete: a review of current concepts: AAOS exhibit selection.

Authors:  Peter D Fabricant; Kristofer J Jones; Demetris Delos; Frank A Cordasco; Robert G Marx; Andrew D Pearle; Russell F Warren; Daniel W Green
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 2.  Anterior cruciate ligament assessment using arthrometry and stress imaging.

Authors:  Eric M Rohman; Jeffrey A Macalena
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-06

3.  Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale.

Authors:  J Lysholm; J Gillquist
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1982 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries.

Authors:  Y Tegner; J Lysholm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Ramp lesions in ACL deficient knees in children and adolescent population: a high prevalence confirmed in intercondylar and posteromedial exploration.

Authors:  Matthieu Malatray; Sebastien Raux; Adrien Peltier; Clemence Pfirrmann; Romain Seil; Franck Chotel
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Growth disturbances without growth arrest after ACL reconstruction in children.

Authors:  Franck Chotel; Julien Henry; Romain Seil; Julien Chouteau; Bernard Moyen; Jérôme Bérard
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Evidence for overgrowth after midfemoral fracture via increased RNA for mitosis.

Authors:  Nomaan Ashraf; Martha H Meyer; Steven Frick; Ralph A Meyer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Growth Arrest Following ACL Reconstruction With Hamstring Autograft in Skeletally Immature Patients: A Review of 4 Cases.

Authors:  Grant D Shifflett; Daniel W Green; Roger F Widmann; Robert G Marx
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.324

9.  Transepiphyseal replacement of the anterior cruciate ligament using quadruple hamstring grafts in skeletally immature patients.

Authors:  Allen F Anderson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  The Effects of Anterolateral Tenodesis on Tibiofemoral Contact Pressures and Kinematics.

Authors:  Eivind Inderhaug; Joanna M Stephen; Hadi El-Daou; Andy Williams; Andrew A Amis
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  6 in total

1.  Over the top anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients with open physes: a long-term follow-up study.

Authors:  Riccardo Maria Lanzetti; Valerio Pace; Alessandro Ciompi; Dario Perugia; Marco Spoliti; Francesco Falez; Caraffa Auro
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Physeal-sparing ACL reconstruction provides better knee laxity restoration but similar clinical outcomes to partial transphyseal and complete transphyseal approaches in the pediatric population: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gherardo Pagliazzi; Marco Cuzzolin; Luca Pacchiarini; Marco Delcogliano; Giuseppe Filardo; Christian Candrian
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 4.114

3.  [Management status of anterior cruciate ligament injury in children and adolescents].

Authors:  Jiang Wu; Wei Luo; Huifeng Zheng; Fuji Ren; Qian Zhao; Jingmin Huang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2022-04-15

Review 4.  Outcome Measures After ACL Injury in Pediatric Patients: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Mette K Zebis; Susan Warming; Maria B Pedersen; Marie H Kraft; S Peter Magnusson; Martin Rathcke; Michael Krogsgaard; Simon Døssing; Tine Alkjær
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-07-30

5.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Lateral Plasty in High-Risk Young Adolescents: Revisions, Subjective Evaluation, and the Role of Surgical Timing on Meniscal Preservation.

Authors:  Alberto Grassi; Luca Macchiarola; Gian Andrea Lucidi; Giacomo Dal Fabbro; Massimilano Mosca; Silvio Caravelli; Stefano Zaffagnini
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 4.355

6.  A Comprehensive Framework to Evaluate the Effects of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury and Reconstruction on Graft and Cartilage Status through the Analysis of MRI T2 Relaxation Time and Knee Laxity: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Gregorio Marchiori; Giorgio Cassiolas; Matteo Berni; Alberto Grassi; Giacomo Dal Fabbro; Milena Fini; Giuseppe Filardo; Stefano Zaffagnini; Nicola Francesco Lopomo
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.