Literature DB >> 32425418

Validity of the Genourob arthrometer in the evaluation of total thickness tears of anterior cruciate ligament.

Anthony Saravia1, Sebastián Cabrera2,3, Claudio R Molina1,4, Loreto Pacheco1, Gabriel Muñoz3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the laxity with the GNRB arthrometer in subjects with anterior cruciate ligament injury. MATERIAL AND
METHOD: A diagnostic study was performed by three operators using the Genourob arthrometer, measuring the displacement of the anterior cruciate ligament. The concordance was assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient mixed effects model, Lin correlation coefficient and graphic method from Bland-Altman. Using the anterior cruciate ligament tear as a dependent variable and the Genourob measurement as an independent variable, a logistic regression was determined.
RESULTS: Obtaining the complete information of 157 knees. The measurements with the Genourob arthrometer distributed symmetrically, with mean ± standard deviation of knees with anterior cruciate ligament injury: 5.64 ± 1.72 and knees without anterior cruciate ligament injury: 3.29 ± 1.72. The ICCs as well as the LCCs were equal to or greater than 0.99. The BA showed discrepancy for a pair of observations no greater than 7.64%. The odds ratio of the knee displacement measurement for the presence of anterior cruciate ligament injury was 4.04 (95% CI: 2.59-6.32; p-value < .01) with a ROC area of 0.863 (95% CI: 0.789-0.9456). The cut-off point of the anteroposterior knee displacement located at 6.8 mm determined a sensitivity of 74.4% and specificity of 93.8%, with a Youden Index = 0.67.
CONCLUSION: The Genourob arthrometer is reliable and valid to establish where laxity values correlate with total thickness tears of the anterior cruciate ligament.
© 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Professor P K Surendran Memorial Education Foundation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior cruciate ligament; Anterior laxity; Arthrometers; Genourob

Year:  2020        PMID: 32425418      PMCID: PMC7225585          DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.03.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop        ISSN: 0972-978X


  14 in total

1.  Objective evaluation of anterior knee laxity; comparison of the KT-1000 and GNRB® arthrometers.

Authors:  Michel Collette; Julie Courville; Marc Forton; Bertrand Gagnière
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  An analysis of the pivot shift phenomenon. The knee motions and subluxations induced by different examiners.

Authors:  F R Noyes; E S Grood; J F Cummings; R R Wroble
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1991 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  A new knee arthrometer, the GNRB: experience in ACL complete and partial tears.

Authors:  H Robert; S Nouveau; S Gageot; B Gagnière
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 2.256

4.  Inter-rater reliability of the GNRB® knee arthrometer.

Authors:  Renata Vauhnik; Matthew C Morrissey; Maja Pohar Perme; France Sevsek; Darja Rugelj
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Anterior tibial laxity using the GNRB® device in healthy knees.

Authors:  Y Alqahtani; J Murgier; P Beaufils; P Boisrenoult; C Steltzlen; N Pujol
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Validity of GNRB® arthrometer compared to Telos™ in the assessment of partial anterior cruciate ligament tears.

Authors:  N Lefevre; Y Bohu; J F Naouri; S Klouche; S Herman
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 7.  Anterior cruciate ligament assessment using arthrometry and stress imaging.

Authors:  Eric M Rohman; Jeffrey A Macalena
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-06

8.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Anterior knee laxity measurement using stress radiographs and the GNRB(®) system versus intraoperative navigation.

Authors:  J-Y Jenny; J Arndt
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 2.256

10.  Diagnostic Tools for Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: GNRB, Lachman Test, and Telos.

Authors:  Seung Min Ryu; Ho Dong Na; Oog Jin Shon
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2018-06-01
View more
  2 in total

1.  The lateral femoral notch sign and coronal lateral collateral ligament sign in magnetic resonance imaging failed to predict dynamic anterior tibial laxity.

Authors:  Tzu-Ching Huang; Zhao-Wei Liu; Chih-Kai Hong; Chi-Hsiu Wang; Kai-Lan Hsu; Fa-Chuan Kuan; Wei-Ren Su
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 2.562

2.  A novel home-based rehabilitative knee brace system is a viable option for postoperative rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a report of 15 cases.

Authors:  Chih-Kai Hong; Zhao-Wei Liu; Kai-Lan Hsu; Fa-Chuan Kuan; Jeng-Feng Yang; Wei-Ren Su
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2022-09-23
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.