| Literature DB >> 26984180 |
Janice P Van Zee1, Jessica A Schlueter2, Shannon Schlueter2, Philip Dixon3, Carlos A Brito Sierra1, Catherine A Hill4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hard ticks (family Ixodidae) are obligatory hematophagous ectoparasites of worldwide medical and veterinary importance. The haploid genomes of multiple species of ixodid ticks exceed 1 Gbp, prompting questions regarding gene, segmental and whole genome duplication in this phyletic group. The availability of the genome assembly for the black legged tick, Ixodes scapularis, and transcriptome datasets for multiple species of ticks offers an opportunity to assess the contribution of gene duplication to the genome. Here we developed a bioinformatics pipeline to identify and analyze duplicated genes (paralogs) using gene models from the prostriate tick, I. scapularis IscaW1.1 annotation and expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from I. scapularis and the metastriate ticks, Rhipicephalus microplus (southern cattle tick), R. appendiculatus (brown ear tick) and Amblyomma variegatum (tropical bont tick).Entities:
Keywords: Ixodes scapularis; Ixodidae; Paralog; Positive selection; Rhipicephalus microplus
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26984180 PMCID: PMC4793754 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-015-2350-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Datasets used for the identification of duplicate genes (paralog pairs) in four species of ixodid ticks
| Species | Number of ESTs | Number of TCsa | Number of gene modelsb |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 192,461 | 20,901 | 24,925 |
|
| 42,512 | 9403 | NA |
|
| 19,123 | 2767 | NA |
|
| 3992 | 478 | NA |
aTentative consensus (TC) sequences were produced by separate alignment of expressed sequence tags (ESTs) for each species; bGene 2 models from the IscaW1.1 annotation; NA not available
Number of paralogs identified from gene models (GM) and tentative consensus (TC) sequences analyzed by PAML. Paralogs were identified by Vmatch using low, medium and high stringency parameters followed by PAML analysis. Paralog pairs are reported as either GM or TC pairs
| Species | Total number of GMs/TCs analyzed | Vmatch stringency level | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lowa | Mediumb | Highc | ||
|
| 24,925 | 160 GM pairs | 115 GM pairs | 91 GM pairs |
|
| 20,901 | 1128 TC pairs | 774 TC pairs | 503 TC pairs |
|
| 9403 | 178 TC pairs | 132 TC pairs | 104 TC pairs |
|
| 2766 | 55 TC pairs | 35 TC pairs | 25 TC pairs |
|
| 478 | 9 TC pairs | 8 TC pairs | 6 TC pairs |
aLow stringency: 75 % of the smaller TC must match ≥ 50 % of the larger TC of a paralog pair; bmedium stringency: 85 % of the smaller TC must match ≥ 70 % of 4 the larger TC of a paralog pair; high stringency: 95 % of the smaller TC must match ≥ 80 % of the larger TC of a paralog pair
Fig. 1Percentage of duplicate sequences (paralog pairs) identified from the Ixodes scapularis, Rhipicephalus microplus, R. appendiculatus and Amblyomma variegatum tentative consensus (TC) sequences using Vmatch at low, medium and high stringency and under positive and negative selection based on PAML results
Fig. 2Percentage of duplicated genes (paralog pairs) in Ixodes scapularis identified from gene models (GMs) by VMATCH analyses at low, medium and high stringency and under positive and negative selection based on PAML analyses
Fig. 3Distribution of putative duplicated sequences (paralog pairs) in (a) Ixodes scapularis and (b) Rhipicephalus microplus based on synonymous substitution rate (Ks) (Vmatch high stringency parameters) versus the density of duplicated sequences. Multi-component (first component, solid line; second component, dashed line, third component, dotted line) and best-fit (data fit, bold solid line) analyses are shown
Fig. 4Distribution of divergence estimates for duplicated sequences from (a) Ixodes scapularis and (b) Rhipicephalus microplus based on the individual Ks rate of paralog pairs identified from TC sequences (Vmatch, high stringency) versus the number of paralogs. Data were binned in 0.1MY intervals for dates between 0–6 MY and variable (non-linear) intervals for dates > 6 MY. MYA: Million years ago