Literature DB >> 26984107

[Partial replacement of the knee joint with patient-specific instruments and implants (ConforMIS iUni, iDuo)].

J Beckmann1, A Steinert2, C Zilkens3, A Zeh4, C Schnurr5, M Schmitt-Sody6, M Gebauer7.   

Abstract

Knee arthroplasty is a successful standard procedure in orthopedic surgery; however, approximately 20 % of patients are dissatisfied with the clinical results as they suffer pain and can no longer achieve the presurgery level of activity. According to the literature the reasons are inexact fitting of the prosthesis or too few anatomically formed implants resulting in less physiological kinematics of the knee joint. Reducing the number of dissatisfied patients and the corresponding number of revisions is an important goal considering the increasing need for artificial joints. In this context, patient-specific knee implants are an obvious alternative to conventional implants. For the first time implants are now matched to the individual bone and not vice versa to achieve the best possible individual situation and geometry and more structures (e.g. ligaments and bone) are preserved or only those structures are replaced which were actually destroyed by arthrosis. According to the authors view, this represents an optimal and pioneering addition to conventional implants. Patient-specific implants and the instruments needed for correct alignment and fitting can be manufactured by virtual 3D reconstruction and 3D printing based on computed tomography (CT) scans. The portfolio covers medial as well as lateral unicondylar implants, medial as well as lateral bicompartmental implants (femorotibial and patellofemoral compartments) and cruciate ligament-preserving as well as cruciate ligament-substituting total knee replacements; however, it must be explicitly emphasized that the literature is sparse and no long-term data are available.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroplasty; Individual; Knee; Partial joint replacement; Patient-specific modeling

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26984107     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-016-3237-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  51 in total

1.  In vivo determination of total knee arthroplasty kinematics: a multicenter analysis of an asymmetrical posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Richard D Komistek; Mohamed R Mahfouz; Kim C Bertin; Aaron Rosenberg; William Kennedy
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-09-24       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  The short-term results of 3 common UKA implants during different periods in Sweden.

Authors:  Otto Robertsson; Lars Lidgren
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Incidence of bicompartmental osteoarthritis in patients undergoing total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: is the time ripe for a less radical treatment?

Authors:  Richard David Heekin; Alexander A Fokin
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 2.757

4.  Tibial plateau coverage in UKA: a comparison of patient specific and off-the-shelf implants.

Authors:  Dylan P Carpenter; Rebecca R Holmberg; Marc J Quartulli; C Lowry Barnes
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Patient-specific instrumentation does not improve alignment in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Robert Russell; Timothy Brown; Michael Huo; Richard Jones
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 2.757

6.  Do patient-specific guides improve coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Ryan M Nunley; Bradley S Ellison; Jinjun Zhu; Erin L Ruh; Stephen M Howell; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Postoperative alignment and ROM affect patient satisfaction after TKA.

Authors:  Shuichi Matsuda; Shinya Kawahara; Ken Okazaki; Yasutaka Tashiro; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Knee arthroplasty in Denmark, Norway and Sweden. A pilot study from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association.

Authors:  Otto Robertsson; Svetlana Bizjajeva; Anne Marie Fenstad; Ove Furnes; Lars Lidgren; Frank Mehnert; Anders Odgaard; Alma Becic Pedersen; Leif Ivar Havelin
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients aged less than 65.

Authors:  Annette W-Dahl; Otto Robertsson; Lars Lidgren; Lisa Miller; David Davidson; Stephen Graves
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Do long leg supine CT scanograms correlate with weight-bearing full-length radiographs to measure lower limb coronal alignment?

Authors:  H O Gbejuade; P White; M Hassaballa; A J Porteous; J R Robinson; J R Murray
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 2.199

View more
  5 in total

1.  Bicompartmental individualized knee replacement : Use of patient-specific implants and instruments (iDuo™).

Authors:  A F Steinert; J Beckmann; B M Holzapfel; M Rudert; J Arnholdt
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 1.154

2.  Relevant changes of leg alignment after customised individually made bicompartmental knee arthroplasty due to overstuffing.

Authors:  Sonia Shamdasani; Nicole Vogel; Raphael Kaelin; Achim Kaim; Markus P Arnold
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 4.114

3.  Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Component Size Prediction with 3-Dimensional Pre-Operative Digital Planning.

Authors:  Michael T Freehill; Jack W Weick; Brent A Ponce; Asheesh Bedi; Derek Haas; Bethany Ruffino; Chris Robbins; Alexander M Prete; John G Costouros; Jon Jp Warner
Journal:  J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast       Date:  2022-05-06

4.  Patient satisfaction - A comparison between patient-specific implants and conventional total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Pia Reimann; Martin Brucker; Dariusch Arbab; Christian Lüring
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-04-08

5.  Evaluation of implant fit and frontal plane alignment after bi-compartmental knee arthroplasty using patient-specific instruments and implants.

Authors:  Joerg Arnholdt; Yama Kamawal; Boris Michael Holzapfel; Axel Ripp; Maximilian Rudert; Andre Friedrich Steinert
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 3.318

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.