Literature DB >> 28144716

Bicompartmental individualized knee replacement : Use of patient-specific implants and instruments (iDuo™).

A F Steinert1, J Beckmann2, B M Holzapfel1,3, M Rudert1, J Arnholdt4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Bicompartmental knee replacement in patients with combined osteoarthritis (OA) of the medial or lateral and patellofemoral compartment. Patient-specific instruments and implants (ConforMIS iDuo™) with a planning protocol for optimal implant fit. INDICATIONS: Bicompartmental OA of the knee (Kellgren & Lawrence stage IV) affecting both the medial or lateral and patellofemoral compartment after unsuccessful conservative or joint-preserving surgery. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Tricompartmental OA, knee ligament instabilities, knee deformities >15° (varus, valgus, extension deficit). Relative contraindication: body mass index >40; prior unicompartmental knee replacement or osteotomies. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Midline or parapatellar medial skin incision, medial arthrotomy; identify mechanical contact zone of the intact femoral condyle (linea terminalis); remove remaining cartilage and all osteophytes that may interfere with the correct placement of the individually designed instruments. Balance knee in extension with patient-specific balancing chips. Resection of proximal tibia with an individual cutting block; confirm axial alignment using an extramedullary alignment guide, balance flexion gap using spacer blocks in 90° flexion. Final femur preparation with resection of the anterior trochlea. After balancing and identification of insert heights, final tibial preparation is performed. Implant is cemented in 45° of knee flexion. Remove excess cement and final irrigation, followed by closure. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Sterile wound dressing; compressive bandage. No limitation of active/passive range of motion (ROM). Partial weight bearing the first 2 weeks, then transition to full weight bearing. Follow-up directly after surgery, at 12 and 52 weeks, then every 1-2 years.
RESULTS: In all, 44 patients with bicompartmental OA of the medial and patellofemoral compartment were treated. Mean age 59 years. Minimum follow-up 12 months. Implant converted to TKA due to tibial loosening (1 patient); patella resurfacing (3 patients). No further revisions or complications. Radiographic analyses demonstrated ideal fit of the implant with less than 2 mm subsidence or overhang. KSS pain scores improved from preoperatively 5.7 to 1.7 postoperatively with level walking, and from 7.3 preoperatively to 2.8 postoperatively with climbing stairs or inclines. The WOMAC score improved from preoperatively 43 to 79 postoperatively.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bicompartmental knee arthroplasty; Knee joint; Patellofemoral knee osteoarthritis; Patient-specific implants; Patient-specific instruments

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28144716     DOI: 10.1007/s00064-017-0484-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol        ISSN: 0934-6694            Impact factor:   1.154


  6 in total

1.  [The bicompartmental knee joint prosthesis Journey Deuce: failure analysis and optimization strategies].

Authors:  M Müller; G Matziolis; R Falk; H Hommel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  Bicompartmental knee arthroplasty: the clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Alfred J Tria
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 2.472

3.  Incidence of bicompartmental osteoarthritis in patients undergoing total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: is the time ripe for a less radical treatment?

Authors:  Richard David Heekin; Alexander A Fokin
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 4.  [Partial replacement of the knee joint with patient-specific instruments and implants (ConforMIS iUni, iDuo)].

Authors:  J Beckmann; A Steinert; C Zilkens; A Zeh; C Schnurr; M Schmitt-Sody; M Gebauer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not?

Authors:  Robert B Bourne; Bert M Chesworth; Aileen M Davis; Nizar N Mahomed; Kory D J Charron
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Does arthroplasty type influence knee joint proprioception? A longitudinal prospective study comparing total and unicompartmental arthroplasty.

Authors:  S M Isaac; K L Barker; I N Danial; D J Beard; C A Dodd; D W Murray
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 2.199

  6 in total
  7 in total

Review 1.  [Scaffold-based Bone Tissue Engineering].

Authors:  B M Holzapfel; M Rudert; D W Hutmacher
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Relevant changes of leg alignment after customised individually made bicompartmental knee arthroplasty due to overstuffing.

Authors:  Sonia Shamdasani; Nicole Vogel; Raphael Kaelin; Achim Kaim; Markus P Arnold
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 4.114

3.  Clinical Outcome of Total Knee Arthroplasty Performed Using Patient-Specific Cutting Guides.

Authors:  Murat Çalbıyık
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2017-12-29

Review 4.  Biomechanical and Clinical Effect of Patient-Specific or Customized Knee Implants: A Review.

Authors:  Jin-Ah Lee; Yong-Gon Koh; Kyoung-Tak Kang
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  The Impact of Total Knee Replacement with a Customized Cruciate-Retaining Implant Design on Patient-Reported and Functional Outcomes.

Authors:  Andre F Steinert; Lennart Schröder; Lukas Sefrin; Björn Janßen; Jörg Arnholdt; Maximilian Rudert
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-01-31

6.  Evaluation of implant fit and frontal plane alignment after bi-compartmental knee arthroplasty using patient-specific instruments and implants.

Authors:  Joerg Arnholdt; Yama Kamawal; Boris Michael Holzapfel; Axel Ripp; Maximilian Rudert; Andre Friedrich Steinert
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 3.318

7.  Accurate implant fit and leg alignment after cruciate-retaining patient-specific total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jörg Arnholdt; Yama Kamawal; Konstantin Horas; Boris M Holzapfel; Fabian Gilbert; Axel Ripp; Maximilian Rudert; Andre F Steinert
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 2.362

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.