Literature DB >> 26980198

The Assisted Decision-Making (Capacity) Act 2015: what it is and why it matters.

B D Kelly1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ireland's Assisted Decision-Making (Capacity) Act 2015 was signed by President Higgins in December 2015 and scheduled for commencement in 2016. AIMS: To explore the content and implications of the 2015 Act.
METHODS: Review of the 2015 Act and related literature.
RESULTS: The 2015 Act places the "will and preferences" of persons with impaired mental capacity at the heart of decision-making relating to "personal welfare" (including healthcare) and "property and affairs". Capacity is to be "construed functionally" and interventions must be "for the benefit of the relevant person". The Act outlines three levels of decision-making assistance: "decision-making assistant", "co-decision-maker" (joint decision-maker) and "decision-making representative" (substitute decision-maker). There are procedures relating to "enduring power of attorney" and "advance healthcare directives"; in the case of the latter, a "refusal of treatment" can be legally binding, while a "request for a specific treatment" must "be taken into consideration".
CONCLUSIONS: The 2015 Act is considerably more workable than the 2013 Bill that preceded it. Key challenges include the subtle decision-making required by patients, healthcare staff, Circuit Court judges and the director of the Decision Support Service; implementation of "advance healthcare directives", especially if they do not form part of a broader model of advance care planning (incorporating the flexibility required for unpredictable future circumstances); and the over-arching issue of logistics, as very many healthcare decisions are currently made in situations where the patient's capacity is impaired. A key challenge will lie in balancing the emphasis on autonomy with principles of beneficence, mutuality and care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Decision-making; Legal capacity; Legislation and jurisprudence; Mental capacity; Mental disorders; Social control

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26980198     DOI: 10.1007/s11845-016-1443-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ir J Med Sci        ISSN: 0021-1265            Impact factor:   1.568


  6 in total

Review 1.  Decision-making capacity for informed consent in the older population.

Authors:  K Christensen; A Haroun; L J Schneiderman; D V Jeste
Journal:  Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law       Date:  1995

2.  An end to psychiatric detention? Implications of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.

Authors:  Brendan D Kelly
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 9.319

Review 3.  The Assisted Decision-Making (Capacity) Bill 2013: content, commentary, controversy.

Authors:  B D Kelly
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 4.  Mental capacity in psychiatric patients: Systematic review.

Authors:  David Okai; Gareth Owen; Hugh McGuire; Swaran Singh; Rachel Churchill; Matthew Hotopf
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 9.319

5.  Medical patients' treatment decision making capacity: a report from a general hospital in Greece.

Authors:  Nikolaos Bilanakis; Aikaterini Vratsista; Eleni Athanasiou; Dimitris Niakas; Vaios Peritogiannis
Journal:  Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health       Date:  2014-11-26

6.  Decision-making capacity for treatment in psychiatric and medical in-patients: cross-sectional, comparative study.

Authors:  Gareth S Owen; George Szmukler; Genevra Richardson; Anthony S David; Vanessa Raymont; Fabian Freyenhagen; Wayne Martin; Matthew Hotopf
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 9.319

  6 in total
  3 in total

1.  Exploring the perspectives of key stakeholders on the design and delivery of a cognitive rehabilitation intervention for people post-stroke.

Authors:  Mairéad O' Donoghue; Pauline Boland; Siobhan Leahy; Rose Galvin; John McManus; Dominika Lisiecka; Sara Hayes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Deprivation of patient liberty: a qualitative study of current practice among geriatricians in a tertiary setting.

Authors:  Michelle Mary Clare O'Brien; Barbara Clyne
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  Using a multidisciplinary approach to reveal decision-making capacity within acute care for an individual with aphasia.

Authors:  Ruth Maxwell; Michelle O'Brien; Deirdre O'Donnell; Lauren Christophers; Thilo Kroll
Journal:  SAGE Open Med Case Rep       Date:  2021-07-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.