Literature DB >> 33818741

Deprivation of patient liberty: a qualitative study of current practice among geriatricians in a tertiary setting.

Michelle Mary Clare O'Brien1, Barbara Clyne2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Assisted Decision Making (Capacity) Act 2015 in Ireland is designed to support and maximise a person's capacity to make decisions, although it has not yet commenced. Amendments to the legislation propose to deal with deprivation of liberty of persons lacking capacity. Health care professionals such as geriatricians will need to focus on enabling patient autonomy in response to legislative changes. AIMS: This study aimed to explore geriatricians' experience in a tertiary hospital setting when dealing with deprivation of liberty scenarios.
METHODS: A generic qualitative study was undertaken in 2019 via 10 separate, semi-structured, in-person interviews with consultant geriatricians. The interview covered patient decision-making and deprivation of patient liberty in the acute setting, thoughts on proposed legislation and elements learned from experience. A thematic analysis was conducted.
RESULTS: Regarding the potential deprivation of patient liberty, five themes emerged: (a) patient capacity, including assessment and opinions; (b) interaction of geriatricians with other professionals and dynamics amongst those that influence decision-making; (c) the environment of factors and frameworks shaping current practice; (d) medico-legal education and geriatricians recognising relevant, challenging cases; (e) the awareness of geriatricians of their attitudes and approaches, including reflecting on one's own practice.
CONCLUSIONS: Results highlight a need for collaborative communication between doctors and legal professionals to achieve a structured and supportive framework to inform practice when working under any proposed legislation relating to deprivation of liberty.
© 2021. Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advocacy; Capacity; Deprivation of liberty; Geriatrician

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33818741     DOI: 10.1007/s11845-021-02615-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ir J Med Sci        ISSN: 0021-1265            Impact factor:   1.568


  12 in total

1.  Problematic interviewee behaviors in qualitative research.

Authors:  Melinda Collins; Mona Shattell; Sandra P Thomas
Journal:  West J Nurs Res       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.967

2.  Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.

Authors:  Allison Tong; Peter Sainsbury; Jonathan Craig
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 2.038

3.  Older persons and compromised decisional capacity: the role of public policy in defining and developing core professional competencies.

Authors:  Marshall B Kapp
Journal:  J Aging Soc Policy       Date:  2014

4.  Reflexivity in Qualitative Research.

Authors:  Joan E Dodgson
Journal:  J Hum Lact       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 2.219

5.  Exploring the perceived medical ethics and law training needs of UK foundation doctors.

Authors:  L L Machin; N Latcham; C Lavelle; R A Williams; L Corfield
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 3.650

6.  The Assisted Decision-Making (Capacity) Act 2015: what it is and why it matters.

Authors:  B D Kelly
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 1.568

7.  Palliative care clinicians' knowledge of the law regarding the use of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS).

Authors:  Caroline Barry; Anna Spathis; Sarah Treaddell; Sally Carding; Stephen Barclay
Journal:  BMJ Support Palliat Care       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 3.568

8.  An Investigation into the use of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards with People with Intellectual Disabilities.

Authors:  Kate Blamires; Rachel Forrester-Jones; Glynis Murphy
Journal:  J Appl Res Intellect Disabil       Date:  2016-06-28

Review 9.  Medical decision making: paternalism versus patient-centered (autonomous) care.

Authors:  Carlos A Rodriguez-Osorio; Guillermo Dominguez-Cherit
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.687

10.  Doctors, Lawyers and Advance Care Planning: Time for Innovation to Work Together to Meet Client Needs.

Authors:  Nola M Ries; Maureen Douglas; Jessica Simon; Konrad Fassbender
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2016-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.