Literature DB >> 24619367

The Assisted Decision-Making (Capacity) Bill 2013: content, commentary, controversy.

B D Kelly1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ireland's Assisted Decision-Making (Capacity) Bill (2013) aims to reform the law relating to persons who require assistance exercising their decision-making capacity. When finalised, the Bill will replace Ireland's outdated Ward of Court system which has an all-or-nothing approach to capacity; does not adequately define capacity; is poorly responsive to change; makes unwieldy provision for appointing decision-makers; and has insufficient provision for review. AIMS: To explore the content and implications of the Assisted Decision-Making (Capacity) Bill.
METHODS: Review of the content of the Assisted Decision-Making (Capacity) Bill and related literature.
RESULTS: The new Bill includes a presumption of capacity and defines lack of capacity. All interventions must minimise restriction of rights and freedom, and have due regard for "dignity, bodily integrity, privacy and autonomy". The Bill proposes legal frameworks for "assisted decision-making" (where an individual voluntarily appoints someone to assist with specific decisions relating to personal welfare or property and affairs, by, among other measures, assisting the individual to communicate his or her "will and preferences"); "co-decision-making" (where the Circuit Court declares the individual's capacity is reduced but he or she can make specific decisions with a co-decision-maker to share authority); "decision-making representatives" (substitute decision-making); "enduring power of attorney"; and "informal decision-making on personal welfare matters" (without apparent oversight).
CONCLUSIONS: These measures, if implemented, will shift Ireland's capacity laws away from an approach based on "best interests" to one based on "will and preferences", and increase compliance with the United Nations' Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24619367     DOI: 10.1007/s11845-014-1096-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ir J Med Sci        ISSN: 0021-1265            Impact factor:   1.568


  3 in total

1.  An end to psychiatric detention? Implications of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.

Authors:  Brendan D Kelly
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 9.319

2.  Mental health legislation and human rights in England, Wales and the Republic of Ireland.

Authors:  Brendan D Kelly
Journal:  Int J Law Psychiatry       Date:  2011-11-21

3.  Challenges and expectations of the Mental Capacity Act 2005: an interview-based study of community-based specialist nurses working in dementia care.

Authors:  Kritika Samsi; Jill Manthorpe; Tayvanie Nagendran; Hazel Heath
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 3.036

  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  The Assisted Decision-Making (Capacity) Act 2015: what it is and why it matters.

Authors:  B D Kelly
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 1.568

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.