Literature DB >> 23540588

Measuring listening effort expended by adolescents and young adults with unilateral or bilateral cochlear implants or normal hearing.

Kathryn C Hughes, Karyn L Galvin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the listening effort expended by adolescents and young adults using implants versus their peers with normal hearing when these two groups are achieving similar speech perception scores. The study also aimed to compare listening effort expended by adolescents and young adults with bilateral cochlear implants when using two implants versus one.
METHODS: Eight participants with bilateral cochlear implants and eight with normal hearing aged 10-22 years were included. Using a dual-task paradigm, participants repeated consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) words presented in noise and performed a visual matching task. Signal-to-noise ratios were set individually to ensure the word perception task was challenging but manageable for all. Reduced performance on the visual task in the dual-task condition relative to the single-task condition was indicative of the effort expended on the listening task.
RESULTS: The cochlear implant group, when using bilateral implants, expended similar levels of listening effort to the normal hearing group when the two groups were achieving similar speech perception scores. For three individuals with cochlear implants, and the group, listening effort was significantly reduced with bilateral compared to unilateral implants. DISCUSSION: The similar amount of listening effort expended by the two groups indicated that a higher signal-to-noise ratio overcame limitations in the auditory information received or processed by the participants with implants. This study is the first to objectively compare listening effort using two versus one cochlear implant. The results provide objective evidence that reduced listening effort is a benefit that some individuals gain from bilateral cochlear implants.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescents; Bilateral cochlear implants; Children; Cochlear implant; Dual-task paradigm; Hearing impairment; Listening effort

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23540588     DOI: 10.1179/1754762812Y.0000000009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int        ISSN: 1467-0100


  24 in total

Review 1.  [Bilateral cochlear implants].

Authors:  J Müller
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  [Listening effort with cochlear implants: Unilateral versus bilateral use].

Authors:  J Schnabl; B Bumann; M Rehbein; O Müller; H Seidler; A Wolf-Magele; G Sprinzl; J Windfuhr; V Weichbold
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Are Young Children With Cochlear Implants Sensitive to the Statistics of Words in the Ambient Spoken Language?

Authors:  Ling-Yu Guo; Karla K McGregor; Linda J Spencer
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Dichotic listening performance and effort as a function of spectral resolution and interaural symmetry.

Authors:  Kristina DeRoy Milvae; Stefanie E Kuchinsky; Olga A Stakhovskaya; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 2.482

5.  Listening Effort Measured in Adults with Normal Hearing and Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Ann E Perreau; Yu-Hsiang Wu; Bailey Tatge; Diana Irwin; Daniel Corts
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 6.  Neurocognitive factors in sensory restoration of early deafness: a connectome model.

Authors:  Andrej Kral; William G Kronenberger; David B Pisoni; Gerard M O'Donoghue
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 44.182

7.  Cortical Activation Patterns Correlate with Speech Understanding After Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Cristen Olds; Luca Pollonini; Homer Abaya; Jannine Larky; Megan Loy; Heather Bortfeld; Michael S Beauchamp; John S Oghalai
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Experience Changes How Emotion in Music Is Judged: Evidence from Children Listening with Bilateral Cochlear Implants, Bimodal Devices, and Normal Hearing.

Authors:  Sara Giannantonio; Melissa J Polonenko; Blake C Papsin; Gaetano Paludetti; Karen A Gordon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Influence of Cochlear Implant Use on Perceived Listening Effort in Adult and Pediatric Cases of Unilateral and Asymmetric Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Erin M Lopez; Margaret T Dillon; Lisa R Park; Meredith A Rooth; Margaret E Richter; Nicholas J Thompson; Brendan P O'Connell; Harold C Pillsbury; Kevin D Brown
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 2.619

10.  Bilateral versus unilateral cochlear implants in children: a study of spoken language outcomes.

Authors:  Julia Sarant; David Harris; Lisa Bennet; Sharyn Bant
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.