Literature DB >> 26967284

The Dark Side of Cell Signaling: Positive Roles for Negative Regulators.

Mark A Lemmon1, Daniel M Freed2, Joseph Schlessinger2, Anatoly Kiyatkin2.   

Abstract

Cell signaling is dominated by analyzing positive responses to stimuli. Signal activation is balanced by negative regulators that are generally considered to terminate signaling. Rather than exerting only negative effects, however, many such regulators play important roles in enhancing cell-signaling control. Considering responses downstream of selected cell-surface receptors, we discuss how receptor internalization affects signaling specificity and how rapid kinase/phosphatase and GTP/GDP cycles increase responsiveness and allow kinetic proofreading in receptor signaling. We highlight the blurring of distinctions between positive and negative signals, recasting signal termination as the response to a switch-like transition into a new cellular state.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26967284      PMCID: PMC4830124          DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.02.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell        ISSN: 0092-8674            Impact factor:   41.582


  93 in total

Review 1.  Lateral phosphorylation propagation: an aspect of feedback signalling?

Authors:  Christian Tischer; Philippe I H Bastiaens
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 2.  Mathematical and computational models of immune-receptor signalling.

Authors:  Byron Goldstein; James R Faeder; William S Hlavacek
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 53.106

Review 3.  Growth factor signaling: where is the specificity?

Authors:  M V Chao
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1992-03-20       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Kinetic proofreading: a new mechanism for reducing errors in biosynthetic processes requiring high specificity.

Authors:  J J Hopfield
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Kinetic proofreading in T-cell receptor signal transduction.

Authors:  T W McKeithan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-05-23       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  An amplified sensitivity arising from covalent modification in biological systems.

Authors:  A Goldbeter; D E Koshland
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Ligand-dependent and -independent transforming growth factor-beta receptor recycling regulated by clathrin-mediated endocytosis and Rab11.

Authors:  Hugh Mitchell; Amit Choudhury; Richard E Pagano; Edward B Leof
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2004-06-30       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 8.  Specificity of receptor tyrosine kinase signaling: transient versus sustained extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation.

Authors:  C J Marshall
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1995-01-27       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Defects in RGS9 or its anchor protein R9AP in patients with slow photoreceptor deactivation.

Authors:  Koji M Nishiguchi; Michael A Sandberg; Aart C Kooijman; Kirill A Martemyanov; Jan W R Pott; Stephanie A Hagstrom; Vadim Y Arshavsky; Eliot L Berson; Thaddeus P Dryja
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Kinetics of inorganic phosphate release during the interaction of p21ras with the GTPase-activating proteins, p120-GAP and neurofibromin.

Authors:  A E Nixon; M Brune; P N Lowe; M R Webb
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1995-11-28       Impact factor: 3.162

View more
  40 in total

1.  Mutual Regulation of Receptor-Like Kinase SIT1 and B'κ-PP2A Shapes the Early Response of Rice to Salt Stress.

Authors:  Ji-Long Zhao; Li-Qing Zhang; Ning Liu; Shou-Ling Xu; Zhi-Liang Yue; Lu-Lu Zhang; Zhi-Ping Deng; Alma L Burlingame; Da-Ye Sun; Zhi-Yong Wang; Ying Sun; Sheng-Wei Zhang
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 11.277

2.  Targeted Quantitative Profiling of GTP-Binding Proteins in Cancer Cells Using Isotope-Coded GTP Probes.

Authors:  Rong Cai; Ming Huang; Yinsheng Wang
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  Analyses of the oncogenic BRAFD594G variant reveal a kinase-independent function of BRAF in activating MAPK signaling.

Authors:  Nicholas J Cope; Borna Novak; Zhiwei Liu; Maria Cavallo; Amber Y Gunderwala; Matthew Connolly; Zhihong Wang
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-01-12       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Shear force-based genetic screen reveals negative regulators of cell adhesion and protrusive activity.

Authors:  Thomas J Lampert; Nadine Kamprad; Marc Edwards; Jane Borleis; Ayende J Watson; Marco Tarantola; Peter N Devreotes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Increasing kinase domain proximity promotes MST2 autophosphorylation during Hippo signaling.

Authors:  Thao Tran; Jaba Mitra; Taekjip Ha; Jennifer M Kavran
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  G Protein-Coupled Receptor Endocytosis Confers Uniformity in Responses to Chemically Distinct Ligands.

Authors:  Nikoleta G Tsvetanova; Michelle Trester-Zedlitz; Billy W Newton; Daniel P Riordan; Aparna B Sundaram; Jeffrey R Johnson; Nevan J Krogan; Mark von Zastrow
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 4.436

Review 7.  A Link Between Alzheimer's and Type II Diabetes Mellitus? Ca+2 -Mediated Signal Control and Protein Localization.

Authors:  Yuko Tsutsui; Franklin A Hays
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 4.345

8.  Gravin-associated kinase signaling networks coordinate γ-tubulin organization at mitotic spindle poles.

Authors:  Paula J Bucko; Irvin Garcia; Ridhima Manocha; Akansha Bhat; Linda Wordeman; John D Scott
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 9.  The impact of phosphatases on proliferative and survival signaling in cancer.

Authors:  Goutham Narla; Jaya Sangodkar; Christopher B Ryder
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 9.261

10.  Ligand Density and Nanoparticle Clustering Cooperate in the Multivalent Amplification of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Activation.

Authors:  Qianyun Zhang; Björn M Reinhard
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 15.881

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.