Literature DB >> 269666

A photographic study of the soft-tissue profile of the Negro population.

N I Sushner.   

Abstract

The present investigation was undertaken to compare the Ricketts, Steiner, and Holdaway soft-tissue values to the Negro individual. The study involved the photographs of more than 1,000 North American Negroes, (500 males and 500 females). One-hundred of the most attractive were selected by a group of judges of different social status levels. In this group fifty male and fifty female soft-tissue profile analyses were performed. The analyses considered were Ricketts' esthetic plane, Holdaway's H line, and Steiner's S line, because they are the most often used and widely accepted. The results of the investigation showed that the black individual was more protrusive in soft-tissue profile and that the standards for white persons established by Ricketts, Steiner, and Holdaway are not applicable to the black individual. Black males were reported to be more protrusive than black females. The study utilized a line drawn from soft-tissue nasion to soft-tissue pogonion. Measurements were made from this line to evaluate the soft-tissue profile. The use of this line suggests a method for measuring the profile in millimeters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 269666     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(77)90350-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod        ISSN: 0002-9416


  16 in total

1.  Perception of Aesthetics by Different Professionals of Different Communities.

Authors:  Amit Pratap Majethia; Vaishali Devidas Vadgaonkar; Kiran Jayant Deshpande; Parag Vishnu Gangurde
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-10-01

2.  Limitations of traditional morphometrics in research on the attractiveness of faces.

Authors:  Erik Holland
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-06

3.  Evaluation of facial attractiveness in black people according to the subjective facial analysis criteria.

Authors:  Andréa Reis de Melo; Ana Cláudia de Castro Ferreira Conti; Renata Rodrigues Almeida-Pedrin; Victor Didier; Danilo Pinelli Valarelli; Leopoldino Capelozza Filho
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2017-02

4.  Geography of the nose: a morphometric study.

Authors:  L G Farkas; J C Kolar; I R Munro
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.326

5.  Can commonly used profile planes be used to evaluate changes in lower lip position?

Authors:  Peter H Buschang; Kimberly Fretty; Phillip M Campbell
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Evaluation of facial soft tissue parameters for Palestinians using Holdaway analysis.

Authors:  Emad Hussein; Susan Al Khateeb; Nezar Watted; Alev Aksoy; Ahu Acar; Mahmoud Abu Mowais
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2011-08-27

7.  Nasal anthropometry on facial computed tomography scans for rhinoplasty in koreans.

Authors:  Kyung Min Moon; Geon Cho; Ha Min Sung; Min Su Jung; Kyoung Seok Tak; Sung-Won Jung; Hoon-Bum Lee; In Suck Suh
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2013-09-13

8.  Optimal antero-posterior position of the maxillary central incisors and its relationship to the forehead in adult African American females.

Authors:  Matthew P Gidaly; Timothy Tremont; Chee Paul Lin; Chung How Kau; Nada M Souccar
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  The influence of sagittal position of the mandible in facial attractiveness and social perception.

Authors:  Lorena Marques Ferreira de Sena; Lislley Anne Lacerda Damasceno E Araújo; Arthur Costa Rodrigues Farias; Hallissa Simplício Gomes Pereira
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr

10.  Soft tissue morphology of Jordanian adolescents.

Authors:  Ahmad Mohammad Hamdan
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.