Literature DB >> 21299383

Can commonly used profile planes be used to evaluate changes in lower lip position?

Peter H Buschang1, Kimberly Fretty, Phillip M Campbell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the validity of five profile planes commonly used to describe the horizontal changes of the lower lip during orthodontic treatment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pretreatment and posttreatment cephalograms of 79 patients (12.4 ± 2.8 years of age) were evaluated. Lower lip (labrale inferiorus) changes over time were measured relative to the Rickett's E-line, Steiner's S1-line, Burstone's B-line, Sushner's S2-line, and Holdaway's H-line. As an independent measure of actual horizontal lip changes, the labrale inferiorus was measured relative to a stable reference plane registered on the sella and oriented on the SN-7°.
RESULTS: The lower lip actually moved anteriorly 2.35 ± 3.35 mm during orthodontic treatment; the five profile planes indicated that the lower lip moved to a more retrusive, posterior position. The five profile planes also showed no statistically significant sex differences in terms of the treatment changes that occurred, while the actual lip changes showed that males exhibited significantly greater changes than females. Actual treatment changes showed that the lower lip moved to a more protrusive position with nonextraction than with extraction treatments, changes that were not evident based on the five profile lines. While lip changes based on the five profile planes demonstrated moderately high to high intercorrelations ranging from 0.81 to 0.97, they showed only weak correlations (r < .35) with the actual horizontal changes of the labrale inferiorus.
CONCLUSIONS: While all five planes measured similar aspects of positional change, none of them closely reflected the actual lower lip changes that occurred. These planes should not be used to measure changes in lip position that occur during treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21299383      PMCID: PMC8919757          DOI: 10.2319/081710-483.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  20 in total

1.  Development of the nose and soft tissue profile.

Authors:  J S Genecov; P M Sinclair; P C Dechow
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Growth changes in the soft tissue facial profile.

Authors:  R S Nanda; H Meng; S Kapila; J Goorhuis
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Psychosocial impact of dental esthetics on quality of life in adolescents.

Authors:  Delcides F de Paula Júnior; Nádia C M Santos; Erica T da Silva; Mariade Fátima Nunes; Cláudio R Leles
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Esthetics, environment, and the law of lip relation.

Authors:  R M Ricketts
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1968-04

5.  Lip posture and its significance in treatment planning.

Authors:  C J Burstone
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1967-04

6.  Dentofacial and soft tissue changes in Class II, division 1 cases treated with and without extractions.

Authors:  S E Bishara; D M Cummins; J R Jakobsen; A R Zaher
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part I.

Authors:  R A Holdaway
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1983-07

8.  Treatment and posttreatment changes in patients with Class II, Division 1 malocclusion after extraction and nonextraction treatment.

Authors:  S E Bishara; D M Cummins; A R Zaher
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  Soft-tissue treatment changes in Class II Division 1 malocclusion with and without extraction of maxillary premolars.

Authors:  Guilherme Janson; Acácio Fuziy; Marcos Roberto de Freitas; José Fernando Castanha Henriques; Renato Rodrigues de Almeida
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  The aging craniofacial complex: a longitudinal cephalometric study from late adolescence to late adulthood.

Authors:  Nikole G Pecora; Tiziano Baccetti; James A McNamara
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.650

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.