Literature DB >> 28658359

The influence of sagittal position of the mandible in facial attractiveness and social perception.

Lorena Marques Ferreira de Sena1, Lislley Anne Lacerda Damasceno E Araújo2, Arthur Costa Rodrigues Farias1, Hallissa Simplício Gomes Pereira3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: : This study aims at comparing the perception of orthodontists, maxillofacial surgeons, visual artists and laypersons when evaluating the influence of sagittal position of the mandible - in lateral view - in facial attractiveness; at a job hiring; and in the perception of socioeconomic profile.
METHODS: : A black male, a white male, a black female and a white female with harmonic faces served as models to obtain a facial profile photograph. Each photograph was digitally manipulated to obtain seven facial profiles: an ideal, three simulating mandibular advancement and three simulating mandibular retrusion, producing 28 photographs. These photographs were evaluated through a questionnaire by orthodontists, maxillofacial surgeons, visual artists and laypersons.
RESULTS: : The anteroposterior positioning of the mandible exerted strong influence on the level of facial attractiveness, but few significant differences between the different groups of evaluators were observed (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: : The profiles pointed as the most attractive were also pointed as more favorable to be hired to a job position and pointed also as having the best socioeconomic condition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28658359      PMCID: PMC5484273          DOI: 10.1590/2177-6709.22.2.077-086.oar

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod        ISSN: 2176-9451


  30 in total

1.  A comparison of the perception of facial profile by the general public and 3 groups of clinicians.

Authors:  S M Cochrane; S J Cunningham; N P Hunt
Journal:  Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg       Date:  1999

2.  A comparison of providers' and consumers' perceptions of facial-profile attractiveness.

Authors:  Jenny R Maple; Katherine W L Vig; F Michael Beck; Peter E Larsen; Shiva Shanker
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Evaluation of horizontal and vertical differences in facial profiles by orthodontists and lay people.

Authors:  K L Romani; F Agahi; R Nanda; J H Zernik
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Appearance and aesthetics in oral health.

Authors:  D C Baldwin
Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 3.383

5.  Evaluation of profile esthetic change with mandibular advancement surgery.

Authors:  A D Shelly; T E Southard; K A Southard; J S Casko; J R Jakobsen; K L Fridrich; J L Mergen
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Perceptions of dental professionals and laypersons to altered dental esthetics: asymmetric and symmetric situations.

Authors:  Vincent O Kokich; Vincent G Kokich; H Asuman Kiyak
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  The influence of tooth colour on the perceptions of personal characteristics among female dental patients: comparisons of unmodified, decayed and 'whitened' teeth.

Authors:  S Kershaw; J T Newton; D M Williams
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 1.626

8.  Presurgical profile preferences of patients and clinicians.

Authors:  V J Arpino; D B Giddon; E A BeGole; C A Evans
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  The relationship between patient, parent and clinician perceived need and normative orthodontic treatment need.

Authors:  Ahmad M Hamdan
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Soft tissue cephalometric analysis for orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  H L Legan; C J Burstone
Journal:  J Oral Surg       Date:  1980-10
View more
  4 in total

1.  Comparative evaluation of facial attractiveness by laypersons in terms of facial proportions and equate it's deviation from divine proportions - A photographic study.

Authors:  Romilkumar Shah; Rahul Nair
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2022-06-12

2.  Effect of Class II functional treatment on facial attractiveness, as perceived by professionals and laypeople.

Authors:  Federica Santori; Francesco Masedu; Domenico Ciavarella; Edoardo Staderini; Claudio Chimenti; Michele Tepedino
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Influence of Age on Perception of Best Esthetical Profile.

Authors:  Parisa Salehi; Niloofar Azadeh; Negin Beigi; Mitra Farzin
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2019-03

4.  What do black patients expect from orthodontic treatment? The aesthetic perception of facial profile between orthodontists and black laypersons.

Authors:  Denise Bitencourt de Souza; Adriana Ismerim Oliveira; Giovana Renata Gouvêa; Milton Santamaria-Jr
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2022-09-05
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.