Literature DB >> 26964741

An efficient design strategy for logistic regression using outcome- and covariate-dependent pooling of biospecimens prior to assay.

Robert H Lyles1, Emily M Mitchell2, Clarice R Weinberg3, David M Umbach3, Enrique F Schisterman2.   

Abstract

Potential reductions in laboratory assay costs afforded by pooling equal aliquots of biospecimens have long been recognized in disease surveillance and epidemiological research and, more recently, have motivated design and analytic developments in regression settings. For example, Weinberg and Umbach (1999, Biometrics 55, 718-726) provided methods for fitting set-based logistic regression models to case-control data when a continuous exposure variable (e.g., a biomarker) is assayed on pooled specimens. We focus on improving estimation efficiency by utilizing available subject-specific information at the pool allocation stage. We find that a strategy that we call "(y,c)-pooling," which forms pooling sets of individuals within strata defined jointly by the outcome and other covariates, provides more precise estimation of the risk parameters associated with those covariates than does pooling within strata defined only by the outcome. We review the approach to set-based analysis through offsets developed by Weinberg and Umbach in a recent correction to their original paper. We propose a method for variance estimation under this design and use simulations and a real-data example to illustrate the precision benefits of (y,c)-pooling relative to y-pooling. We also note and illustrate that set-based models permit estimation of covariate interactions with exposure.
© 2016, The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bootstrap; Efficiency; Epidemiology; Pooling; Study design

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26964741      PMCID: PMC5014596          DOI: 10.1111/biom.12489

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  10 in total

1.  Using pooled exposure assessment to improve efficiency in case-control studies.

Authors:  C R Weinberg; D M Umbach
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  The Collaborative Perinatal Project: lessons and legacy.

Authors:  Janet B Hardy
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.797

3.  Specimen pooling for efficient use of biospecimens in studies of time to a common event.

Authors:  Paramita Saha-Chaudhuri; Clarice R Weinberg
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Analysis of multistage pooling studies of biological specimens for estimating disease incidence and prevalence.

Authors:  R Brookmeyer
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  To pool or not to pool, from whether to when: applications of pooling to biospecimens subject to a limit of detection.

Authors:  Enrique F Schisterman; Albert Vexler
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.980

6.  Pooling of sera for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing: an economical method for use in developing countries.

Authors:  J C Emmanuel; M T Bassett; H J Smith; J A Jacobs
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Evaluation of human immunodeficiency virus seroprevalence in population surveys using pooled sera.

Authors:  R L Kline; T A Brothers; R Brookmeyer; S Zeger; T C Quinn
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Hybrid pooled-unpooled design for cost-efficient measurement of biomarkers.

Authors:  Enrique F Schisterman; Albert Vexler; Sunni L Mumford; Neil J Perkins
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Circulating chemokine levels and miscarriage.

Authors:  Brian W Whitcomb; Enrique F Schisterman; Mark A Klebanoff; Mona Baumgarten; Alice Rhoton-Vlasak; Xiaoping Luo; Nasser Chegini
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  A highly efficient design strategy for regression with outcome pooling.

Authors:  Emily M Mitchell; Robert H Lyles; Amita K Manatunga; Neil J Perkins; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 2.373

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Gamma models for estimating the odds ratio for a skewed biomarker measured in pools and subject to errors.

Authors:  Dane R Van Domelen; Emily M Mitchell; Neil J Perkins; Enrique F Schisterman; Amita K Manatunga; Yijian Huang; Robert H Lyles
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 5.899

Review 2.  Lipid and Creatinine Adjustment to Evaluate Health Effects of Environmental Exposures.

Authors:  Katie M O'Brien; Kristen Upson; Jessie P Buckley
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2017-03

3.  Logistic regression with a continuous exposure measured in pools and subject to errors.

Authors:  Dane R Van Domelen; Emily M Mitchell; Neil J Perkins; Enrique F Schisterman; Amita K Manatunga; Yijian Huang; Robert H Lyles
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 2.373

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.