Literature DB >> 23821316

Specimen pooling for efficient use of biospecimens in studies of time to a common event.

Paramita Saha-Chaudhuri1, Clarice R Weinberg.   

Abstract

For case-control studies that rely on expensive assays for biomarkers, specimen pooling offers a cost-effective and efficient way to estimate individual-level odds ratios. Pooling helps to conserve irreplaceable biospecimens for the future, mitigates limit-of-detection problems, and enables inclusion of individuals who have limited available volumes of biospecimen. Pooling can also allow the study of a panel of biomarkers under a fixed assay budget. Here, we extend this method for application to discrete-time survival studies. Assuming a proportional odds logistic model for risk of a common outcome, we propose a design strategy that forms pooling sets within those experiencing the outcome at the same event time. We show that the proposed design enables a cost-effective analysis to assess the association of a biomarker with the outcome. Because the standard likelihood is slightly misspecified for the proposed pooling strategy under a nonnull biomarker effect, the proposed approach produces slightly biased estimates of exposure odds ratios. We explore the extent of this bias via simulations and illustrate the method by revisiting a data set relating polychlorinated biphenyls and 1,1-dichloro-2,2-bis(p-chlorophenyl)ethylene to time to pregnancy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  discrete event time outcome; pooling; pooling for biomarker; pooling for exposure; time to pregnancy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23821316      PMCID: PMC3698992          DOI: 10.1093/aje/kws442

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  15 in total

1.  Using pooled exposure assessment to improve efficiency in case-control studies.

Authors:  C R Weinberg; D M Umbach
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  DNA Pooling: a tool for large-scale association studies.

Authors:  Pak Sham; Joel S Bader; Ian Craig; Michael O'Donovan; Michael Owen
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  The Collaborative Perinatal Project: lessons and legacy.

Authors:  Janet B Hardy
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.797

4.  ROC curve analysis for biomarkers based on pooled assessments.

Authors:  David Faraggi; Benjamin Reiser; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Pooled exposure assessment for matched case-control studies.

Authors:  Paramita Saha-Chaudhuri; David M Umbach; Clarice R Weinberg
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.822

6.  Maternal serum levels of polychlorinated biphenyls and 1,1-dichloro-2,2-bis(p-chlorophenyl)ethylene (DDE) and time to pregnancy.

Authors:  Dionne C Gesink Law; Mark A Klebanoff; John W Brock; David B Dunson; Matthew P Longnecker
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Methodological aspects of a national population-based study of persistent organochlorine compounds in serum.

Authors:  Michael N Bates; Simon J Buckland; Nick Garrett; Samuel P Caudill; Howard Ellis
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 7.086

8.  DDT and DDE exposure in mothers and time to pregnancy in daughters.

Authors:  Barbara A Cohn; Piera M Cirillo; Mary S Wolff; Pamela J Schwingl; Richard D Cohen; Robert I Sholtz; Assiamira Ferrara; Roberta E Christianson; Barbara J van den Berg; Pentti K Siiteri
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-06-28       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Persistent organochlorines in the serum of the non-occupationally exposed New Zealand population.

Authors:  Michael N Bates; Simon J Buckland; Nick Garrett; Howard Ellis; Larry L Needham; Donald G Patterson; Wayman E Turner; David G Russell
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.086

10.  To pool or not to pool, from whether to when: applications of pooling to biospecimens subject to a limit of detection.

Authors:  Enrique F Schisterman; Albert Vexler
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.980

View more
  10 in total

1.  Case-control data analysis for randomly pooled biomarkers.

Authors:  Neil J Perkins; Emily M Mitchell; Robert H Lyles; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 2.207

2.  Estimating relative risk of a log-transformed exposure measured in pools.

Authors:  Emily M Mitchell; Torie C Plowden; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  An efficient design strategy for logistic regression using outcome- and covariate-dependent pooling of biospecimens prior to assay.

Authors:  Robert H Lyles; Emily M Mitchell; Clarice R Weinberg; David M Umbach; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Associations of prenatal phthalate exposure with neurobehavioral outcomes in 4.5- and 7.5-month-old infants.

Authors:  Jenna L N Sprowles; Kelsey L C Dzwilewski; Francheska M Merced-Nieves; Salma M A Musaad; Susan L Schantz; Sarah D Geiger
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Associations of Prenatal Exposure to Phthalates with Measures of Cognition in 4.5-Month-Old Infants.

Authors:  Francheska M Merced-Nieves; Kelsey L C Dzwilewski; Andrea Aguiar; Salma Musaad; Susan A Korrick; Susan L Schantz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-13       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Determination of Varying Group Sizes for Pooling Procedure.

Authors:  Wenjun Xiong; Hongyu Lu; Juan Ding
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 2.238

7.  Accounting for urinary dilution in peri-implantation samples: implications for creatinine adjustment and specimen pooling.

Authors:  Ana K Rosen Vollmar; Caroline H Johnson; Clarice R Weinberg; Nicole C Deziel; Donna D Baird; Allen J Wilcox; Anne Marie Z Jukic
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 5.563

8.  A Discriminant Function Approach to Adjust for Processing and Measurement Error When a Biomarker is Assayed in Pooled Samples.

Authors:  Robert H Lyles; Dane Van Domelen; Emily M Mitchell; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Pooling Bio-Specimens in the Presence of Measurement Error and Non-Linearity in Dose-Response: Simulation Study in the Context of a Birth Cohort Investigating Risk Factors for Autism Spectrum Disorders.

Authors:  Karyn Heavner; Craig Newschaffer; Irva Hertz-Picciotto; Deborah Bennett; Igor Burstyn
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Addressing data privacy in matched studies via virtual pooling.

Authors:  P Saha-Chaudhuri; C R Weinberg
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 4.615

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.