| Literature DB >> 26963816 |
Yong Woo Kim1, Jin Wook Jeoung2, Dai Woo Kim3, Michael J A Girard4,5, Jean Martial Mari6, Ki Ho Park2, Dong Myung Kim2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Quantitative evaluation of lamina cribrosa (LC) posterior bowing in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) eyes using swept-source optical coherence tomography.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26963816 PMCID: PMC4786321 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150260
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Subject demographics.
| Variable | POAG ( | Healthy ( | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, year | 60.4 ± 10.6 | 62.1 ± 10.7 | 0.23 |
| Diabetic mellitus, | 12 (10.7) | 14 (15.2) | 0.40 |
| Hypertension, | 31 (27.7) | 30 (32.6) | 0.45 |
| SE, D | –1.08 ± 2.51 | –0.61 ± 2.67 | 0.21 |
| AXL, mm | 24.13 ± 1.16 | 23.80 ± 1.28 | 0.11 |
| Disc area, mm2 | 2.03 ± 0.42 | 2.14 ± 0.36 | 0.07 |
POAG: primary open-angle glaucoma, IOP: intraocular pressure, SE: spherical equivalence, D: diopter, AXL: axial length, MD: mean deviation, RNFL: retinal nerve fiber layer
Mean ± standard deviation
*Comparison performed using Student’s t-test
†Comparison performed using chi-square test
Statistically significant values are shown in bold.
Comparison of anterior laminar insertion depth (ALID), mean lamina cribrosa depth (mLCD), and lamina cribrosa (LC) curvature index between the eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma and healthy control.
| POAG ( | Healthy ( | P-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Horizontal | ALID, μm | |||
| mLCD, μm | ||||
| LC curvature index, μm | ||||
| Vertical | ALID, μm | |||
| mLCD, μm | ||||
| LC curvature index, μm |
ALID: anterior laminar insertion depth, LC: lamina cribrosa, mLCD: mean anterior lamina cribrosa surface depth, POAG: primary open-angle glaucoma
Mean ± standard deviation
*Comparison performed using Student’s t-test
Statistically significant values are shown in bold.
Factors associated with increased lamina cribrosa curvature index (univariate analysis).
| Variable | Univariate analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| β | 95% CI | P-value | |
| Age, for each year older | –0.2 | –0.5, 0.2 | 0.41 |
| Gender, male | 7.3 | 0.3, 15.0 | 0.06 |
| DM | 6.1 | –5.6, 17.8 | 0.30 |
| HTN | –0.3 | –9.0, 8.3 | 0.94 |
| Untreated IOP, per 1 mmHg increase | 1.1 | –0.01, 2.2 | 0.05 |
| IOP at examination, per 1 mmHg increase | 0.3 | –1.2, 1.8 | 0.69 |
| SE, per 1 increase | –1.6 | –3.2, 0.03 | 0.06 |
| AXL, per 1 mm increase | 2.0 | –1.5, 5.6 | 0.26 |
| CCT, per 1 μm increase | –0.02 | –0.1, 0.1 | 0.81 |
| MD of VF, per 1 dB increase | –1.0 | –2.1, 0.04 | 0.06 |
AXL: axial length, CCT: central corneal thickness, CI: confidence interval, IOP: intraocular pressure, RNFL: retinal nerve fiber layer, MD: mean deviation, VF: visual field
Statistical analysis was performed using the general linear model.
Statistically significant values are shown in bold.
Factors associated with increased lamina cribrosa curvature index (multivariate analysis).
| Variable | Multivariate analysis model 1 | Multivariate analysis model 2 | Multivariate analysis model 3 | Multivariate analysis model 4 | Multivariate analysis model 5 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | 95% CI | P-value | β | 95% CI | P-value | β | 95% CI | P-value | β | 95% CI | P-value | β | 95% CI | P-value | |
| Gender, male | 2.0 | –4.1, 8.1 | 0.52 | 2.6 | –5.1, 10.4 | 0.50 | 3.5 | –3.0, 10.0 | 0.29 | 3.48 | –10.0, –3.0 | 0.29 | 2.3 | –5.7, 10.3 | 0.57 |
| Untreated IOP, per 1 mmHg increase | –0.03 | –0.9, 0.9 | 0.95 | 0.6 | –0.5, 1.7 | 0.28 | 0.04 | –1.0, 1.0 | 0.94 | –0.1 | –1.0, 0.9 | 0.88 | 0.4 | –0.7, 1.6 | 0.45 |
| –0.7 | –2.3, 0.8 | 0.35 | 0.03 | –1.4, 1.5 | 0.97 | –0.4 | –1.7, 1.0 | 0.58 | 0.1 | –1.5, 1.7 | 0.90 | ||||
| –0.2 | –0.6, 0.1 | 0.21 | |||||||||||||
| MD of VF, per 1 dB increase | –0.3 | –1.3, 0.8 | 0.62 | 0.7 | –0.4, 1.9 | 0.21 | |||||||||
AXL: axial length, CCT: central corneal thickness, CI: confidence interval, IOP: intraocular pressure, RNFL: retinal nerve fiber layer, MD: mean deviation, VF: visual field
Statistical analysis was performed using the general linear model. Statistically significant values are shown in bold.
* Factors with P < 0.10 in the univariate analysis were included in the multivariate analysis.
Patient demographics according to the severity of glaucoma.
| Variable | Healthy ( | Mild glaucoma ( | Moderate to advanced glaucoma ( | P-value | Post hoc anlaysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, year | 62.1 ± 10.7 | 60.8 ± 10.5 | 58.9 ± 11.1 | 0.33 | |
| Female, | 55 (59.8) | 41 (44.6) | 15 (48.4) | 0.11 | |
| DM, | 14 (15.2) | 9 (10.6) | 3 (11.1) | 0.63 | |
| HTN, | 30 (32.6) | 25 (29.4) | 6 (22.2) | 0.58 | |
| AXL, mm | 23.8 ± 1.3 | 24.2 ± 1.2 | 24.1 ± 1.2 | 0.27 | |
IOP: intraocular pressure, AXL: axial length, CCT: central corneal thickness, RNFL: retinal nerve fiber layer, MD: mean deviation.
Mean ± standard deviation
* Comparison was performed using one-way analysis of variance with post hoc Scheffe’s multiple comparison testing
†Comparison was performed using chi-square test. Statistically significant values are shown in bold.