PURPOSE: We improved the visibility of the lamina cribrosa (LC), including its posterior boundary, in optical coherence tomography (OCT) images of the human optic nerve head (ONH). METHODS: An adaptive compensation algorithm was developed to overcome a limitation of our standard compensation algorithm, that is the overamplification of noise at high depth. Such limitation currently hampers our ability to distinguish the posterior LC boundary. In adaptive compensation, standard compensation operations are performed until an energy threshold is reached, at which stage the compensation process is stopped to limit noise overamplification in the deeper portion of the OCT image. The performance of adaptive compensation was compared to that of standard compensation using OCT images of 5 human ONHs. RESULTS: Adaptive compensation significantly reduced the intralayer contrast (a measure of pixel intensity uniformity) in the deeper portion of the OCT images (from 0.62 ± 0.11-0.30 ± 0.03, P < 0.001), indicating successful removal of noise overamplification. Furthermore, adaptive compensation significantly increased the interlayer contrast (a measure of boundary visibility) across the posterior LC boundary (from 0.29 ± 0.13-0.61 ± 0.21, P < 0.001), indicating improved posterior LC boundary visibility. CONCLUSIONS: Adaptive compensation provided significant improvement compared to standard compensation by eliminating noise overamplification at high depth and improving the visibility of the posterior LC boundary. These improvements were performed while maintaining all other benefits of compensation, such as shadow removal and contrast enhancement. Adaptive compensation will help further our efforts to characterize in vivo ONH biomechanics for the diagnosis and monitoring of glaucoma.
PURPOSE: We improved the visibility of the lamina cribrosa (LC), including its posterior boundary, in optical coherence tomography (OCT) images of the human optic nerve head (ONH). METHODS: An adaptive compensation algorithm was developed to overcome a limitation of our standard compensation algorithm, that is the overamplification of noise at high depth. Such limitation currently hampers our ability to distinguish the posterior LC boundary. In adaptive compensation, standard compensation operations are performed until an energy threshold is reached, at which stage the compensation process is stopped to limit noise overamplification in the deeper portion of the OCT image. The performance of adaptive compensation was compared to that of standard compensation using OCT images of 5 human ONHs. RESULTS: Adaptive compensation significantly reduced the intralayer contrast (a measure of pixel intensity uniformity) in the deeper portion of the OCT images (from 0.62 ± 0.11-0.30 ± 0.03, P < 0.001), indicating successful removal of noise overamplification. Furthermore, adaptive compensation significantly increased the interlayer contrast (a measure of boundary visibility) across the posterior LC boundary (from 0.29 ± 0.13-0.61 ± 0.21, P < 0.001), indicating improved posterior LC boundary visibility. CONCLUSIONS: Adaptive compensation provided significant improvement compared to standard compensation by eliminating noise overamplification at high depth and improving the visibility of the posterior LC boundary. These improvements were performed while maintaining all other benefits of compensation, such as shadow removal and contrast enhancement. Adaptive compensation will help further our efforts to characterize in vivo ONH biomechanics for the diagnosis and monitoring of glaucoma.
Authors: Chen Wu; Narendran Sudheendran; Manmohan Singh; Irina V Larina; Mary E Dickinson; Kirill V Larin Journal: J Biomed Opt Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 3.170
Authors: Michaël J A Girard; Nicholas G Strouthidis; Adrien Desjardins; Jean Martial Mari; C Ross Ethier Journal: J R Soc Interface Date: 2013-07-24 Impact factor: 4.118
Authors: Lin He; Hongli Yang; Stuart K Gardiner; Galen Williams; Christy Hardin; Nicholas G Strouthidis; Brad Fortune; Claude F Burgoyne Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-01-29 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Tin A Tun; Eray Atalay; Mani Baskaran; Monisha E Nongpiur; Hla M Htoon; David Goh; Ching-Yu Cheng; Shamira A Perera; Tin Aung; Nicholas G Strouthidis; Michaël J A Girard Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Lindsay A Rhodes; Carrie Huisingh; John Johnstone; Massimo Fazio; Brandon Smith; Mark Clark; J Crawford Downs; Cynthia Owsley; Michael J A Girard; Jean Martial Mari; Christopher Girkin Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-11-20 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: L Beaton; J Mazzaferri; F Lalonde; M Hidalgo-Aguirre; D Descovich; M R Lesk; S Costantino Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2015-04-13 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Sripad Krishna Devalla; Prajwal K Renukanand; Bharathwaj K Sreedhar; Giridhar Subramanian; Liang Zhang; Shamira Perera; Jean-Martial Mari; Khai Sing Chin; Tin A Tun; Nicholas G Strouthidis; Tin Aung; Alexandre H Thiéry; Michaël J A Girard Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2018-06-25 Impact factor: 3.732