| Literature DB >> 26960132 |
Julien Jorda1, Michael R Sawaya1, Todd O Yeates1.
Abstract
Ab initio phasing by direct computational methods in low-resolution X-ray crystallography is a long-standing challenge. A common approach is to consider it as two subproblems: sampling of phase space and identification of the correct solution. While the former is amenable to a myriad of search algorithms, devising a reliable target function for the latter problem remains an open question. Here, recent developments in CrowdPhase, a collaborative online game powered by a genetic algorithm that evolves an initial population of individuals with random genetic make-up (i.e. random phases) each expressing a phenotype in the form of an electron-density map, are presented. Success relies on the ability of human players to visually evaluate the quality of these maps and, following a Darwinian survival-of-the-fittest concept, direct the search towards optimal solutions. While an initial study demonstrated the feasibility of the approach, some important crystallographic issues were overlooked for the sake of simplicity. To address these, the new CrowdPhase includes consideration of space-group symmetry, a method for handling missing amplitudes, the use of a map correlation coefficient as a quality metric and a solvent-flattening step. Performances of this installment are discussed for two low-resolution test cases based on bona fide diffraction data.Entities:
Keywords: CrowdPhase; crowdsourcing; direct methods; phase problem
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26960132 PMCID: PMC4784676 DOI: 10.1107/S2059798316003405
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol ISSN: 2059-7983 Impact factor: 7.652
Figure 1Monitoring the phasing evolution across generations for two low-resolution experiments in CrowdPhase. The plot shows the evolution of the average map correlation coefficient at each generation for the viral capsid puzzle (blue) and the centrosymmetric polypeptide puzzle (purple). The first game reached its termination step at the 40th generation, while the centrosymmetric experiment ended at generation 15.
Figure 2Stereoviews of electron-density maps derived from the viral capsid game. The atomic model of the viral capsid is represented sitting at one corner and the center of the centered cubic unit cell (a). The electron-density map calculated using model phases is depicted as a blue mesh in (b). The electron-density map obtained with CrowdPhase was calculated by combining the observed amplitudes with predicted phases and amplitudes and is shown in purple (c); (d) represents the same map after NCS averaging. All electron-density maps were displayed with a contour level of 1σ.
Figure 3Stereoviews of electron-density maps for the centrosymmetric data set. The electron-density map calculated with model phases is depicted in blue (a), the map calculated using phases obtained from CrowdPhase is in purple (b) and an atomic model of the molecules found in one asymmetric unit is shown in gray. We defined the contour level at 0.6σ in both cases.