Literature DB >> 22065763

Algorithm discovery by protein folding game players.

Firas Khatib1, Seth Cooper, Michael D Tyka, Kefan Xu, Ilya Makedon, Zoran Popovic, David Baker, Foldit Players.   

Abstract

Foldit is a multiplayer online game in which players collaborate and compete to create accurate protein structure models. For specific hard problems, Foldit player solutions can in some cases outperform state-of-the-art computational methods. However, very little is known about how collaborative gameplay produces these results and whether Foldit player strategies can be formalized and structured so that they can be used by computers. To determine whether high performing player strategies could be collectively codified, we augmented the Foldit gameplay mechanics with tools for players to encode their folding strategies as "recipes" and to share their recipes with other players, who are able to further modify and redistribute them. Here we describe the rapid social evolution of player-developed folding algorithms that took place in the year following the introduction of these tools. Players developed over 5,400 different recipes, both by creating new algorithms and by modifying and recombining successful recipes developed by other players. The most successful recipes rapidly spread through the Foldit player population, and two of the recipes became particularly dominant. Examination of the algorithms encoded in these two recipes revealed a striking similarity to an unpublished algorithm developed by scientists over the same period. Benchmark calculations show that the new algorithm independently discovered by scientists and by Foldit players outperforms previously published methods. Thus, online scientific game frameworks have the potential not only to solve hard scientific problems, but also to discover and formalize effective new strategies and algorithms.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22065763      PMCID: PMC3223433          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1115898108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  6 in total

1.  Computer simulation of protein folding.

Authors:  M Levitt; A Warshel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1975-02-27       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Design of a novel globular protein fold with atomic-level accuracy.

Authors:  Brian Kuhlman; Gautam Dantas; Gregory C Ireton; Gabriele Varani; Barry L Stoddard; David Baker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-11-21       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Protein structure prediction using Rosetta.

Authors:  Carol A Rohl; Charlie E M Strauss; Kira M S Misura; David Baker
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.600

4.  Protein folding by restrained energy minimization and molecular dynamics.

Authors:  M Levitt
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1983-11-05       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Predicting protein structures with a multiplayer online game.

Authors:  Seth Cooper; Firas Khatib; Adrien Treuille; Janos Barbero; Jeehyung Lee; Michael Beenen; Andrew Leaver-Fay; David Baker; Zoran Popović; Foldit Players
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Crystal structure of a monomeric retroviral protease solved by protein folding game players.

Authors:  Firas Khatib; Frank DiMaio; Seth Cooper; Maciej Kazmierczyk; Miroslaw Gilski; Szymon Krzywda; Helena Zabranska; Iva Pichova; James Thompson; Zoran Popović; Mariusz Jaskolski; David Baker
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2011-09-18       Impact factor: 15.369

  6 in total
  129 in total

1.  Control of protein signaling using a computationally designed GTPase/GEF orthogonal pair.

Authors:  Gregory T Kapp; Sen Liu; Amelie Stein; Derek T Wong; Attila Reményi; Brian J Yeh; James S Fraser; Jack Taunton; Wendell A Lim; Tanja Kortemme
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Gamorithm.

Authors:  Moshe Sipper; Jason H Moore
Journal:  IEEE Trans Games       Date:  2018-08-29

3.  InteractiveROSETTA: a graphical user interface for the PyRosetta protein modeling suite.

Authors:  Christian D Schenkelberg; Christopher Bystroff
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Selective refinement and selection of near-native models in protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Jiong Zhang; Bogdan Barz; Jingfen Zhang; Dong Xu; Ioan Kosztin
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2015-08-12

Review 5.  Selection on protein structure, interaction, and sequence.

Authors:  Peter B Chi; David A Liberles
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 6.  Computational methods in drug discovery.

Authors:  Gregory Sliwoski; Sandeepkumar Kothiwale; Jens Meiler; Edward W Lowe
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 25.468

Review 7.  Crowdsourcing--harnessing the masses to advance health and medicine, a systematic review.

Authors:  Benjamin L Ranard; Yoonhee P Ha; Zachary F Meisel; David A Asch; Shawndra S Hill; Lance B Becker; Anne K Seymour; Raina M Merchant
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Relaxation of backbone bond geometry improves protein energy landscape modeling.

Authors:  Patrick Conway; Michael D Tyka; Frank DiMaio; David E Konerding; David Baker
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  A walk in the park: Is Pokémon Go foreshadowing the future of biodiversity research and scientific outreach?

Authors:  David Roy Smith
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 8.807

10.  Scientific benchmarks for guiding macromolecular energy function improvement.

Authors:  Andrew Leaver-Fay; Matthew J O'Meara; Mike Tyka; Ron Jacak; Yifan Song; Elizabeth H Kellogg; James Thompson; Ian W Davis; Roland A Pache; Sergey Lyskov; Jeffrey J Gray; Tanja Kortemme; Jane S Richardson; James J Havranek; Jack Snoeyink; David Baker; Brian Kuhlman
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.600

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.