Literature DB >> 26958303

An Assessment of Family History Information Captured in an Electronic Health Record.

Fernanda Polubriaginof1, Nicholas P Tatonetti1, David K Vawdrey2.   

Abstract

Family history is considered a core element of clinical care. In this study we assessed the quality of family history data captured in an established commercial electronic health record (EHR) at a large academic medical center. Because the EHR had no centralized location to store family history information, it was collected as part of clinical notes in structured or free-text format. We analyzed differences between 10,000 free-text and 9,121 structured family history observations. Each observation was classified according to disease presence/absence and family member affected (e.g., father, mother, etc.). The structured notes did not collect a complete family history as defined by standards endorsed by the U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; the free-text notes contained more information than the structured notes, but still not enough to be considered "complete." Several barriers remain for collecting complete, useful family history data in electronic health records.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26958303      PMCID: PMC4765557     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  27 in total

1.  Computer support for genetic advice in primary care.

Authors:  J Emery
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Welcome to the genomic era.

Authors:  Alan E Guttmacher; Francis S Collins
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-09-04       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Reconsidering the family history in primary care.

Authors:  Eugene C Rich; Wylie Burke; Caryl J Heaton; Susanne Haga; Linda Pinsky; M Priscilla Short; Louise Acheson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Multi-source development of an integrated model for family health history.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Chen; Elizabeth W Carter; Tamara J Winden; Indra Neil Sarkar; Yan Wang; Genevieve B Melton
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 5.  Clinical decision support for genetically guided personalized medicine: a systematic review.

Authors:  Brandon M Welch; Kensaku Kawamoto
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-08-25       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Which risk model to use? Clinical implications of the ACS MRI screening guidelines.

Authors:  Elissa M Ozanne; Brian Drohan; Phil Bosinoff; Alan Semine; Michael Jellinek; Claire Cronin; Frederick Millham; Dana Dowd; Taryn Rourke; Caroline Block; Kevin S Hughes
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  The economics of clinical genetics services. III. Cognitive genetics services are not self-supporting.

Authors:  B A Bernhardt; R E Pyeritz
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Autosomal dominant inheritance of early-onset breast cancer. Implications for risk prediction.

Authors:  E B Claus; N Risch; W D Thompson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1994-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing for BRCA-related cancer in women: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors:  Virginia A Moyer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  A breast cancer prediction model incorporating familial and personal risk factors.

Authors:  Jonathan Tyrer; Stephen W Duffy; Jack Cuzick
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  16 in total

1.  Challenges with Collecting Smoking Status in Electronic Health Records.

Authors:  Fernanda Polubriaginof; Hojjat Salmasian; David A Albert; David K Vawdrey
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-04-16

2.  Low Screening Rates for Diabetes Mellitus Among Family Members of Affected Relatives.

Authors:  Fernanda C G Polubriaginof; Ning Shang; George Hripcsak; Nicholas P Tatonetti; David K Vawdrey
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-12-05

3.  Automatic Genetic Risk Assessment Calculation Using Breast Cancer Family History Data from the EHR compared to Self-Report.

Authors:  Margaret Sin; Julia E McGuinness; Meghna S Trivedi; Alejandro Vanegas; Thomas B Silverman; Katherine D Crew; Rita Kukafka
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-12-05

Review 4.  Family health history: underused for actionable risk assessment.

Authors:  Geoffrey S Ginsburg; R Ryanne Wu; Lori A Orlando
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Physicians' strategies for using family history data: having the data is not the same as using the data.

Authors:  Peter Taber; Parveen Ghani; Joshua D Schiffman; Wendy Kohlmann; Rachel Hess; Valli Chidambaram; Kensaku Kawamoto; Rosalie G Waller; Damian Borbolla; Guilherme Del Fiol; Charlene Weir
Journal:  JAMIA Open       Date:  2020-10-08

6.  Primary care physician referral practices regarding BRCA1/2 genetic counseling in a major health system.

Authors:  Debra T Linfield; Michael B Rothberg; Elizabeth R Pfoh; Ryan Noss; Lydia Cassard; Joseph C Powers; Laura Lipold; Kathryn A Martinez
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 4.624

7.  Association of Disparities in Family History and Family Cancer History in the Electronic Health Record With Sex, Race, Hispanic or Latino Ethnicity, and Language Preference in 2 Large US Health Care Systems.

Authors:  Daniel Chavez-Yenter; Melody S Goodman; Yuyu Chen; Xiangying Chu; Richard L Bradshaw; Rachelle Lorenz Chambers; Priscilla A Chan; Brianne M Daly; Michael Flynn; Amanda Gammon; Rachel Hess; Cecelia Kessler; Wendy K Kohlmann; Devin M Mann; Rachel Monahan; Sara Peel; Kensaku Kawamoto; Guilherme Del Fiol; Meenakshi Sigireddi; Saundra S Buys; Ophira Ginsburg; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-10-03

8.  Genome-wide polygenic score to predict chronic kidney disease across ancestries.

Authors:  Atlas Khan; Michael C Turchin; Amit Patki; Vinodh Srinivasasainagendra; Ning Shang; Rajiv Nadukuru; Alana C Jones; Edyta Malolepsza; Ozan Dikilitas; Iftikhar J Kullo; Daniel J Schaid; Elizabeth Karlson; Tian Ge; James B Meigs; Jordan W Smoller; Christoph Lange; David R Crosslin; Gail P Jarvik; Pavan K Bhatraju; Jacklyn N Hellwege; Paulette Chandler; Laura Rasmussen Torvik; Alex Fedotov; Cong Liu; Christopher Kachulis; Niall Lennon; Noura S Abul-Husn; Judy H Cho; Iuliana Ionita-Laza; Ali G Gharavi; Wendy K Chung; George Hripcsak; Chunhua Weng; Girish Nadkarni; Marguerite R Irvin; Hemant K Tiwari; Eimear E Kenny; Nita A Limdi; Krzysztof Kiryluk
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 87.241

9.  Comparison of family health history in surveys vs electronic health record data mapped to the observational medical outcomes partnership data model in the All of Us Research Program.

Authors:  Robert M Cronin; Alese E Halvorson; Cassie Springer; Xiaoke Feng; Lina Sulieman; Roxana Loperena-Cortes; Kelsey Mayo; Robert J Carroll; Qingxia Chen; Brian K Ahmedani; Jason Karnes; Bruce Korf; Christopher J O'Donnell; Jun Qian; Andrea H Ramirez
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 10.  Using the electronic health record for genomics research.

Authors:  Maya S Safarova; Iftikhar J Kullo
Journal:  Curr Opin Lipidol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 4.616

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.