Literature DB >> 2912071

The economics of clinical genetics services. III. Cognitive genetics services are not self-supporting.

B A Bernhardt1, R E Pyeritz.   

Abstract

We investigated the amount of time required to provide, and the charges and reimbursement for, cognitive genetics services in four clinical settings. In a prenatal diagnostic center, a mean of 3 h/couple was required to provide counseling and follow-up services with a mean charge of $30/h and collection of $27/h. Only 49% of personnel costs were covered by income from patient charges. In a genetics clinic in a private specialty hospital, 5.5 and 2.75 h were required to provide cognitive services to each new and follow-up family, respectively. The mean charge for each new family was $25/h and for follow-up families $13/h. The amount collected was less than 25% of that charged. In a pediatric genetics clinic in a large teaching hospital, new families required a mean of 4 h and were charged $28/h; follow-up families also required a mean of 4 h, and were charged $15/h. Only 55% of the amounts charged were collected. Income from patient charges covered only 69% of personnel costs. In a genetics outreach setting, 5 and 4.5 h were required to serve new and follow-up families, respectively. Charges were $25/h and $12/h, and no monies were collected. In all clinic settings, less than one-half of the total service time was that of a physician, and more than one-half of the service time occurred before and after the clinic visit. In no clinic setting were cognitive genetics services self-supporting. Means to improve the financial base of cognitive genetics services include improving collections, increasing charges, developing fee schedules, providing services more efficiently, and seeking state, federal, and foundation support for services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2912071      PMCID: PMC1715403     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  8 in total

1.  Feature article: Recombinant DNA technology, genetic tests, and public policy.

Authors:  N A Holtzman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  The economics of clinical genetics services. II. A time analysis of a medical genetics clinic.

Authors:  B A Bernhardt; J Weiner; E C Foster; J E Tumpson; R E Pyeritz
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  The economics of clinical genetics services. I. Preview.

Authors:  R E Pyeritz; J E Tumpson; B A Bernhardt
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Survey of medical genetics personnel.

Authors:  W H Finley; S C Finley; R L Dyer
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Physician payment reform: finally.

Authors:  R A Berenson
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Consumer costs for genetic services.

Authors:  T L Myers; L A Prouty
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1987-03

7.  Effect of patient age on duration of medical encounters with physicians.

Authors:  E B Keeler; D H Solomon; J C Beck; R C Mendenhall; R L Kane
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Variability among state Crippled Children's Service programs: pluralism thrives.

Authors:  H T Ireys; R J Hauck; J M Perrin
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 9.308

  8 in total
  14 in total

Review 1.  Reconsidering the family history in primary care.

Authors:  Eugene C Rich; Wylie Burke; Caryl J Heaton; Susanne Haga; Linda Pinsky; M Priscilla Short; Louise Acheson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Billing for medical genetics and genetic counseling services: a national survey.

Authors:  Tabitha A Harrison; Debra Lochner Doyle; Caroline McGowan; Leslie Cohen; Elizabeth Repass; Ruthann B Pfau; Trish Brown
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  The economics of clinical genetics services. IV. Financial impact of outpatient genetic services on an academic institution.

Authors:  B A Bernhardt; J E Tumpson; R E Pyeritz
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Contracting for clinical genetic services: the Welsh model.

Authors:  H E Hughes; J K Alderman; M Krawczak; C Rogers
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 6.318

5.  1999 Presidential Address to the National Society of Genetic Counselors.

Authors:  W R Uhlmann
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  National Society Of Genetic Counselors Natalie Weissberger Paul National Leadership Award Address: "Patients and Research: Paths to Personal and Professional Growth".

Authors:  Barbara A Bernhardt
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  An Assessment of Family History Information Captured in an Electronic Health Record.

Authors:  Fernanda Polubriaginof; Nicholas P Tatonetti; David K Vawdrey
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2015-11-05

8.  Billing and Record-Keeping for Familial Cancer Risk Counseling: A National Survey.

Authors:  B A Bernhardt; B N Peshkin; Y Kemel
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Delivery of molecular genetic services within a health care system: time analysis of the clinical workload. The Molecular Genetic Study Group.

Authors:  L C Surh; P G Wright; M Cappelli; A Kasaboski; V A Hastings; A G Hunter
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Factors influencing patients' decisions to decline cancer genetic counseling services.

Authors:  K P Geer; M E Ropka; W F Cohn; S M Jones; S Miesfeldt
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.