Literature DB >> 23093547

Which risk model to use? Clinical implications of the ACS MRI screening guidelines.

Elissa M Ozanne1, Brian Drohan, Phil Bosinoff, Alan Semine, Michael Jellinek, Claire Cronin, Frederick Millham, Dana Dowd, Taryn Rourke, Caroline Block, Kevin S Hughes.   

Abstract

The American Cancer Society (ACS) guidelines define the appropriate use of MRI as an adjunct to mammography for breast cancer screening. Three risk assessment models are recommended to determine if women are at sufficient risk to warrant the use of this expensive screening tool, however, the real-world application of these models has not been explored. We sought to understand how these models behave in a community setting for women undergoing mammography screening. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 5,894 women, who received mammography screening at a community hospital and assessed their eligibility for MRI according to the ACS guidelines. Of the 5,894 women, 342 (5.8%) were eligible for MRI, but we found significant differences in the number of eligible women identified by each model. Our results indicate that these models identify very different populations, implying that the ACS guidelines deserve further development and consideration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23093547     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-0570

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  16 in total

1.  An Assessment of Family History Information Captured in an Electronic Health Record.

Authors:  Fernanda Polubriaginof; Nicholas P Tatonetti; David K Vawdrey
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2015-11-05

2.  Overutilization of Breast Cancer Screening in the US: Awareness of a Growing Problem.

Authors:  Mara A Schonberg
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging as an Adjunct to Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening in Women at Less Than High Risk for Breast Cancer: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2016-11-01

4.  Disparities in the use of screening magnetic resonance imaging of the breast in community practice by race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status.

Authors:  Jennifer S Haas; Deirdre A Hill; Robert D Wellman; Rebecca A Hubbard; Christoph I Lee; Karen J Wernli; Natasha K Stout; Anna N A Tosteson; Louise M Henderson; Jennifer A Alford-Teaster; Tracy L Onega
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Breast Cancer Screening for Women at Average Risk: 2015 Guideline Update From the American Cancer Society.

Authors:  Kevin C Oeffinger; Elizabeth T H Fontham; Ruth Etzioni; Abbe Herzig; James S Michaelson; Ya-Chen Tina Shih; Louise C Walter; Timothy R Church; Christopher R Flowers; Samuel J LaMonte; Andrew M D Wolf; Carol DeSantis; Joannie Lortet-Tieulent; Kimberly Andrews; Deana Manassaram-Baptiste; Debbie Saslow; Robert A Smith; Otis W Brawley; Richard Wender
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Patterns of breast magnetic resonance imaging use in community practice.

Authors:  Karen J Wernli; Wendy B DeMartini; Laura Ichikawa; Constance D Lehman; Tracy Onega; Karla Kerlikowske; Louise M Henderson; Berta M Geller; Mike Hofmann; Bonnie C Yankaskas
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 21.873

7.  Rapid increase in breast magnetic resonance imaging use: trends from 2000 to 2011.

Authors:  Natasha K Stout; Larissa Nekhlyudov; Lingling Li; Elisabeth S Malin; Dennis Ross-Degnan; Diana S M Buist; Marjorie A Rosenberg; Marina Alfisher; Suzanne W Fletcher
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 21.873

8.  Distribution of Estimated Lifetime Breast Cancer Risk Among Women Undergoing Screening Mammography.

Authors:  Bethany L Niell; Bianca Augusto; McKenzie McIntyre; Claire C Conley; Travis Gerke; Richard Roetzheim; Jennifer Garcia; Susan T Vadaparampil
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Recent Trends in Screening Breast MRI.

Authors:  Michelle V Lee; Shani Aharon; Kevin Kim; Katerina Sunn Konstantinoff; Catherine M Appleton; Dustin Stwalley; Margaret A Olsen
Journal:  J Breast Imaging       Date:  2021-12-11

10.  Breast cancer risk assessment in 8,824 women attending a family history evaluation and screening programme.

Authors:  D Gareth R Evans; Sarah Ingham; Sarah Dawe; L Roberts; F Lalloo; A R Brentnall; P Stavrinos; Anthony Howell
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.