Literature DB >> 25656807

Impact of age on quality-of-life outcomes after treatment for localized prostate cancer.

Lindsay A Hampson1, Janet E Cowan2, Shoujun Zhao2, Peter R Carroll2, Matthew R Cooperberg3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Men aged >65 yr are less likely to receive local therapy for prostate cancer (PCa), perhaps because of concerns about quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: To describe QOL before and after PCa treatment in men of varying ages. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Participants enrolled in CaPSURE who underwent radical prostatectomy, brachytherapy, external beam radiation, androgen deprivation therapy, or active surveillance for localized PCa. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: QOL changes over time were assessed among age groups using repeated-measures mixed models adjusted for race, year, clinical risk, treatment, comorbidities, and an age-time interaction term. Differences are reported as adjusted least-square means and percentage decline. Secondary analyses evaluated age and QOL for local (prostatectomy, radiation) compared to nonlocal treatment (hormonal, surveillance). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Older men had lower mean unadjusted pre- and post-treatment QOL scores for nearly all domains. Of the domains evaluated, adjusted mean sexual function, sexual bother, and urinary function showed greater declines from baseline to 2 yr. At 2 yr, more men <60 yr than those >70 yr experienced declines in urinary function (14% vs 9%) and sexual bother (39% vs 17%). Declines in these domains were also greater for local than for nonlocal treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Definitive treatment for localized disease should not be deferred for older men because of fears regarding QOL declines. Younger men should be counseled about potential post-treatment declines in QOL despite higher absolute QOL scores. Communicating these differences to patients will facilitate more appropriate treatment decision-making in men of all ages. PATIENT
SUMMARY: In this study we evaluated quality of life before and after treatment for localized prostate cancer in a diverse patient population. Declines in quality of life after treatment varied according to age and treatment. We conclude that counseling about quality of life will help patients of all ages to make more appropriate treatment decisions.
Copyright © 2015 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age; Prostate cancer; Quality of life; Treatment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25656807     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.01.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  17 in total

Review 1.  Role of regenerative therapies on erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  S T Hansen; M Lund; L D Ostergaard; L Lund
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 2.896

2.  Treatment of localized prostate cancer in elderly patients.

Authors:  Mohammed Haseebuddin; Marc C Smaldone
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-08

3.  Healthcare utilization in men with poorer sexual and urinary function recovery following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Peter A Elliott; George A Abdelsayed; Patrick S Kilday; Brian J Kim; Jeff M Slezak; Gary W Chien
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Improving quality through clinical registries in urology.

Authors:  Mark D Tyson; Daniel A Barocas
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.309

5.  Radical prostatectomy versus deferred treatment for localised prostate cancer.

Authors:  Robin Wm Vernooij; Michelle Lancee; Anne Cleves; Philipp Dahm; Chris H Bangma; Katja Kh Aben
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-06-04

6.  Reliability and validity of PROMIS measures administered by telephone interview in a longitudinal localized prostate cancer study.

Authors:  Caroleen W Quach; Michelle M Langer; Ronald C Chen; David Thissen; Deborah S Usinger; Marc A Emerson; Bryce B Reeve
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Active Surveillance in Younger Men With Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Michael S Leapman; Janet E Cowan; Hao G Nguyen; Katsuto K Shinohara; Nannette Perez; Matthew R Cooperberg; William J Catalona; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Age-specific health-related quality of life in disease-free long-term prostate cancer survivors versus male population controls-results from a population-based study.

Authors:  Salome Adam; Daniela Doege; Lena Koch-Gallenkamp; Melissa S Y Thong; Heike Bertram; Andrea Eberle; Bernd Holleczek; Ron Pritzkuleit; Mechthild Waldeyer-Sauerland; Annika Waldmann; Sylke Ruth Zeissig; Lina Jansen; Sabine Rohrmann; Hermann Brenner; Volker Arndt
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 9.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer: current evidence and contemporary state of practice.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tosoian; H Ballentine Carter; Abbey Lepor; Stacy Loeb
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 14.432

10.  Development and Internal Validation of a Web-based Tool to Predict Sexual, Urinary, and Bowel Function Longitudinally After Radiation Therapy, Surgery, or Observation.

Authors:  Aaron A Laviana; Zhiguo Zhao; Li-Ching Huang; Tatsuki Koyama; Ralph Conwill; Karen Hoffman; Michael Goodman; Ann S Hamilton; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Lisa E Paddock; Antoinette Stroup; Matthew R Cooperberg; Mia Hashibe; Brock B O'Neil; Sherrie H Kaplan; Sheldon Greenfield; David F Penson; Daniel A Barocas
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 20.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.