Literature DB >> 11912384

Feasibility study: watchful waiting for localized low to intermediate grade prostate carcinoma with selective delayed intervention based on prostate specific antigen, histological and/or clinical progression.

Richard Choo1, Laurence Klotz, Cyril Danjoux, Gerard C Morton, Gerrit DeBoer, Ewa Szumacher, Neil Fleshner, Peter Bunting, George Hruby.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We assessed the feasibility of a watchful waiting protocol with selective delayed intervention using clinical, prostate specific antigen (PSA) or histological progression as treatment indications for clinically localized prostate cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective, single arm cohort study patients with favorable clinical parameters (stage T1b to T2b N0M0, Gleason score 7 or less and PSA 15 ng./ml. or less) are conservatively treated with watchful waiting. When a patient meets disease progression criteria, arbitrarily defined by the 3 parameters of the rate of PSA increase, clinical progression or histological upgrade on repeat prostate biopsy, appropriate treatment is implemented. Patients are followed every 3 months for the first 2 years and every 6 months thereafter. Serum PSA measurement and digital rectal examination are done at each visit and repeat prostate biopsy is performed 18 months after study enrollment.
RESULTS: Since November 1995, the study has accrued 206 patients with a median followup of 29 months (range 2 to 66). Of these men 137 remain on the surveillance protocol with no disease progression, while 69 were withdrawn from study for various reasons. There was clinical, PSA and histological progression in 16, 15 and 5 cases, respectively. The estimated actuarial probability of remaining on the surveillance protocol was 67% at 2 years and 48% at 4. The probability of remaining progression-free was 81% and 67% at 2 and 4 years, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: A policy of watchful waiting with selectively delayed intervention based on predefined criteria of disease progression is feasible. This strategy offers the benefit of an individualized approach based on the demonstrated risk of clinical or biochemical progression with time and, thus, it may decrease the burden of therapy in patients with indolent disease, while providing definitive therapy for those with biologically active disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11912384

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  73 in total

Review 1.  Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: an update.

Authors:  Nathan Lawrentschuk; Laurence Klotz
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  The utility of provincial AS guidelines.

Authors:  Munir Jamal
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and pharmacokinetic models in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Tobias Franiel; Bernd Hamm; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Active surveillance for favorable-risk prostate cancer: what are the results and how safe is it?

Authors:  Laurence Klotz
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Management of low-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Robert A Gardiner; Freddie C Hamdy
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Focal therapy for localized prostate cancer -choosing the middle ground.

Authors:  Uri Lindner; John Trachtenberg
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 7.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer: trials and tribulations.

Authors:  Laurence Klotz
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Patient Experience of Thyroid Cancer Active Surveillance in Japan.

Authors:  Louise Davies; Benjamin R Roman; Mitsuhiro Fukushima; Yasuhiro Ito; Akira Miyauchi
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 6.223

Review 9.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer: current evidence and contemporary state of practice.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tosoian; H Ballentine Carter; Abbey Lepor; Stacy Loeb
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 14.432

10.  Treatment outcomes of radical prostatectomy in potential candidates for 3 published active surveillance protocols.

Authors:  C Shad Thaxton; Stacy Loeb; Kimberly A Roehl; Donghui Kan; William J Catalona
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 2.649

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.