| Literature DB >> 26950206 |
Joseph Vandigo1, Ebenezer Oloyede1, Abdalla Aly2, Aurelia L Laird3, Catherine E Cooke4, C Daniel Mullins1.
Abstract
Researchers have produced evidence that identifies interventions that reduce cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk; however, despite a significant investment in research CVD remains the leading cause of death. Engaging patients in the research process has the potential to ensure that evidence-based treatments are adopted in real-world practice to improve patient outcomes. The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute has created an Engagement Rubric to guide meaningful engagement in the research process. A 10-step systematic framework to enhance patient engagement throughout the comparative effectiveness research process also has been proposed. This special report identifies the relationship between these two approaches to patient engagement and describes examples of how patients could be engaged in a hypothetical CVD study.Entities:
Keywords: cardiovascular disease; clinical comparative effectiveness research; engagement rubric; patient engagement; patient-centered outcomes research
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26950206 DOI: 10.1586/14737167.2016.1163222
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res ISSN: 1473-7167 Impact factor: 2.217