Literature DB >> 26950206

Continuous patient engagement in cardiovascular disease clinical comparative effectiveness research.

Joseph Vandigo1, Ebenezer Oloyede1, Abdalla Aly2, Aurelia L Laird3, Catherine E Cooke4, C Daniel Mullins1.   

Abstract

Researchers have produced evidence that identifies interventions that reduce cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk; however, despite a significant investment in research CVD remains the leading cause of death. Engaging patients in the research process has the potential to ensure that evidence-based treatments are adopted in real-world practice to improve patient outcomes. The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute has created an Engagement Rubric to guide meaningful engagement in the research process. A 10-step systematic framework to enhance patient engagement throughout the comparative effectiveness research process also has been proposed. This special report identifies the relationship between these two approaches to patient engagement and describes examples of how patients could be engaged in a hypothetical CVD study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiovascular disease; clinical comparative effectiveness research; engagement rubric; patient engagement; patient-centered outcomes research

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26950206     DOI: 10.1586/14737167.2016.1163222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res        ISSN: 1473-7167            Impact factor:   2.217


  7 in total

1.  Health Care Systems Support to Enhance Patient-Centered Care: Lessons from a Primary Care-Based Chronic Pain Management Initiative.

Authors:  Charles R Elder; Lynn L Debar; Cheryl Ritenbaugh; Maureen H Rumptz; Charlotte Patterson; Allison Bonifay; Penney Cowan; Lindsay Lancaster; Richard A Deyo
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2017

2.  Querying stakeholders to inform comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  Yoon Duk Hong; Daisuke Goto; C Daniel Mullins
Journal:  J Comp Eff Res       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 1.744

3.  Multi-Method Patient-Engagement Approach: A Case Example from a PCORI-Funded Training Project.

Authors:  Elisabeth M Oehrlein; T Rose Love; Chinenye Anyanwu; Maya L Hanna; Jacqueline Kraska; Eleanor M Perfetto
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 4.  A roadmap of strategies to support cardiovascular researchers: from policy to practice.

Authors:  Niamh Chapman; Emma E Thomas; Joanne T M Tan; Sally C Inglis; Jason H Y Wu; Rachel E Climie; Dean S Picone; Lauren C Blekkenhorst; Steven G Wise; Katrina M Mirabito Colafella; Anna C Calkin; Francine Z Marques
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 49.421

5.  Bridging the Patient Engagement Gap in Research and Quality Improvement Utilizing the Henry Ford Flexible Engagement Model.

Authors:  Heather A Olden; Sara Santarossa; Dana Murphy; Christine C Johnson; Karen E Kippen
Journal:  J Patient Cent Res Rev       Date:  2022-01-17

6.  Patients, clinicians and researchers working together to improve cardiovascular health: a qualitative study of barriers and priorities for patient-oriented research.

Authors:  Maria-Jose Santana; Sandra Zelinsky; Sadia Ahmed; Chelsea Doktorchik; Matthew James; Stephen Wilton; Hude Quan; Nicolas Fernandez; Todd Anderson; Sonia Butalia
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Diverse stakeholder engagement at the heart of co-designing cardiac arrest care.

Authors:  Elizabeth D Paratz; Gregory Page; Jessica Maris; Jessica Orchard; Christopher Semsarian; Andre La Gerche
Journal:  Heart Rhythm O2       Date:  2022-01-20
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.