Literature DB >> 26944690

Effects of follower load and rib cage on intervertebral disc pressure and sagittal plane curvature in static tests of cadaveric thoracic spines.

Dennis E Anderson1, Erin M Mannen2, Hadley L Sis3, Benjamin M Wong3, Eileen S Cadel3, Elizabeth A Friis4, Mary L Bouxsein5.   

Abstract

The clinical relevance of mechanical testing studies of cadaveric human thoracic spines could be enhanced by using follower preload techniques, by including the intact rib cage, and by measuring thoracic intervertebral disc pressures, but studies to date have not incorporated all of these components simultaneously. Thus, this study aimed to implement a follower preload in the thoracic spine with intact rib cage, and examine the effects of follower load, rib cage stiffening and rib cage removal on intervertebral disc pressures and sagittal plane curvatures in unconstrained static conditions. Intervertebral disc pressures increased linearly with follower load magnitude. The effect of the rib cage on disc pressures in static conditions remains unclear because testing order likely confounded the results. Disc pressures compared well with previous reports in vitro, and comparison with in vivo values suggests the use of a follower load of about 400N to approximate loading in upright standing. Follower load had no effect on sagittal plane spine curvature overall, suggesting successful application of the technique, although increased flexion in the upper spine and reduced flexion in the lower spine suggest that the follower load path was not optimized. Rib cage stiffening and removal both increased overall spine flexion slightly, although with differing effects at specific spinal locations. Overall, the approaches demonstrated here will support the use of follower preloads, intact rib cage, and disc pressure measurements to enhance the clinical relevance of future studies of the thoracic spine.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Follower load; Intervertebral disc pressure; Mechanical testing; Rib cage; Thoracic spine

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26944690      PMCID: PMC4851616          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.02.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  34 in total

1.  Neural arch load-bearing in old and degenerated spines.

Authors:  P Pollintine; A S Przybyla; P Dolan; M A Adams
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Lumbar intradiscal pressure. Experimental studies on post-mortem material.

Authors:  A NACHEMSON
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand Suppl       Date:  1960

3.  Biomechanical contribution of the rib cage to thoracic stability.

Authors:  Leonardo B C Brasiliense; Bruno C R Lazaro; Phillip M Reyes; Seref Dogan; Nicholas Theodore; Neil R Crawford
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Quantification of intradiscal pressures below thoracolumbar spinal fusion constructs: is there evidence to support "saving a level"?

Authors:  Joshua D Auerbach; Baron S Lonner; Thomas J Errico; Andrew Freeman; Derek Goerke; Brian P Beaubien
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Sustained loading generates stress concentrations in lumbar intervertebral discs.

Authors:  M A Adams; D W McMillan; T P Green; P Dolan
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Thoracic range of motion, stability, and correlation to imaging-determined degeneration.

Authors:  Andrew T Healy; Prasath Mageswaran; Daniel Lubelski; Benjamin P Rosenbaum; Virgilio Matheus; Edward C Benzel; Thomas E Mroz
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2015-05-15

7.  Loads on the lumbar spine. Validation of a biomechanical analysis by measurements of intradiscal pressures and myoelectric signals.

Authors:  A Schultz; G Andersson; R Ortengren; K Haderspeck; A Nachemson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 8.  VEPTR: past experience and the future of VEPTR principles.

Authors:  Robert M Campbell
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  The incidence of vertebral fractures in men and women: the Rotterdam Study.

Authors:  Marjolein Van der Klift; Chris E D H De Laet; Eugene V McCloskey; Albert Hofman; Huibert A P Pols
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Sternocostal joints. Anatomic, radiographic and pathologic features in adult cadavers.

Authors:  J P Schils; D Resnick; P Haghighi; D Trudell; D J Sartoris
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 6.016

View more
  5 in total

1.  The rib cage stiffens the thoracic spine in a cadaveric model with body weight load under dynamic moments.

Authors:  Erin M Mannen; Elizabeth A Friis; Hadley L Sis; Benjamin M Wong; Eileen S Cadel; Dennis E Anderson
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2018-05-16

2.  Biomechanical Evaluation of a Growth-Friendly Rod Construct.

Authors:  Sarah Galvis; Josh Arnold; Erin Mannen; Benjamin Wong; Hadley Sis; Eileen Cadel; John Anderson; Dennis Anderson; Paul Arnold; Elizabeth Friis
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2017-01

3.  How Does the Rib Cage Affect the Biomechanical Properties of the Thoracic Spine? A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Christian Liebsch; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-15

4.  Effect of follower load on motion and stiffness of the human thoracic spine with intact rib cage.

Authors:  Hadley L Sis; Erin M Mannen; Benjamin M Wong; Eileen S Cadel; Mary L Bouxsein; Dennis E Anderson; Elizabeth A Friis
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  The rib cage reduces intervertebral disc pressures in cadaveric thoracic spines by sharing loading under applied dynamic moments.

Authors:  Dennis E Anderson; Erin M Mannen; Rebecca Tromp; Benjamin M Wong; Hadley L Sis; Eileen S Cadel; Elizabeth A Friis; Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 2.712

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.