Literature DB >> 25951677

The Belmont Report. Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research.

.   

Abstract

On July 12, 1974, the National Research Act (Pub. L. 93-348) was signed into law, thereby creating the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. One of the charges to the Commission was to identify the basic ethical principles that should underlie the conduct of biomedical and behavioral research involving human subjects and to develop guidelines which should be followed to assure that such research is conducted in accordance with those principles. In carrying out the above, the Commission was directed to consider: (a) the boundaries between biomedical and behavioral research and the accepted and routine practice of medicine, (b) the role of assessment of risk-benefit criteria in the determination of the appropriateness of research involving human subjects, (c) appropriate guidelines for the selection of human subjects for participation in such research and (d) the nature and definition of informed consent in various research settings. The Belmont Report attempts to summarize the basic ethical principles identified by the Commission in the course of its deliberations. It is the outgrowth of an intensive four-day period of discussions that were held in February 1976 at the Smithsonian Institution's Belmont Conference Center supplemented by the monthly deliberations of the Commission that were held over a period of nearly four years. It is a statement of basic ethical principles and guidelines that should assist in resolving the ethical problems that surround the conduct of research with human subjects. By publishing the Report in the Federal Register, and providing reprints upon request, the Secretary intends that it may be made readily available to scientists, members of Institutional Review Boards, and Federal employees. The two-volume Appendix, containing the lengthy reports of experts and specialists who assisted the Commission in fulfilling this part of its charge, is available as DHEW Publication No. (OS) 78-0013 and No. (OS) 78-0014, for sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. Unlike most other reports of the Commission, the Belmont Report does not make specific recommendations for administrative action by the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare. Rather, the Commission recommended that the Belmont Report be adopted in its entirety, as a statement of the Department's policy. The Department requests public comment on this recommendation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25951677

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Dent        ISSN: 0002-7979


  738 in total

1.  Clinical trials in children: problems and pitfalls.

Authors:  R E Kauffman
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.022

2.  The concept of risk in biomedical research involving human subjects.

Authors:  P H Van Ness
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.898

3.  Ethical issues in diagnosis.

Authors:  H Tristram Engelhardt
Journal:  Metamedicine       Date:  1980-02

4.  Developing a federal policy on research misconduct.

Authors:  Sybil Francis
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Statistics and ethics in medical research.

Authors:  David L DeMets
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  Methodological, practical, and ethical challenges to inner-city health research.

Authors:  Ahmed M Bayoumi; Stephen W Hwang
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.671

7.  Consenting for molecular diagnostics.

Authors:  Robert Klitzman
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 8.327

8.  Perceptions of reimbursement for clinical trial participation.

Authors:  Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Melissa Loza; Kathleen Vincent; Thomas Moench; Lawrence R Stanberry; Susan L Rosenthal
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.742

9.  Implementing National System of Health Research Ethics Regulations: The Nigerian Experience.

Authors:  Aminu Yakubu; Clement A Adebamowo
Journal:  BEOnline       Date:  2012

Review 10.  The parameters of informed consent.

Authors:  Edward L Raab
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2004
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.