Literature DB >> 26930114

Genome editing for crop improvement: Challenges and opportunities.

Naglaa A Abdallah1, Channapatna S Prakash2, Alan G McHughen3.   

Abstract

Genome or gene editing includes several new techniques to help scientists precisely modify genome sequences. The techniques also enables us to alter the regulation of gene expression patterns in a pre-determined region and facilitates novel insights into the functional genomics of an organism. Emergence of genome editing has brought considerable excitement especially among agricultural scientists because of its simplicity, precision and power as it offers new opportunities to develop improved crop varieties with clear-cut addition of valuable traits or removal of undesirable traits. Research is underway to improve crop varieties with higher yields, strengthen stress tolerance, disease and pest resistance, decrease input costs, and increase nutritional value. Genome editing encompasses a wide variety of tools using either a site-specific recombinase (SSR) or a site-specific nuclease (SSN) system. Both systems require recognition of a known sequence. The SSN system generates single or double strand DNA breaks and activates endogenous DNA repair pathways. SSR technology, such as Cre/loxP and Flp/FRT mediated systems, are able to knockdown or knock-in genes in the genome of eukaryotes, depending on the orientation of the specific sites (loxP, FLP, etc.) flanking the target site. There are 4 main classes of SSN developed to cleave genomic sequences, mega-nucleases (homing endonuclease), zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcriptional activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), and the CRISPR/Cas nuclease system (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat/CRISPR-associated protein). The recombinase mediated genome engineering depends on recombinase (sub-) family and target-site and induces high frequencies of homologous recombination. Improving crops with gene editing provides a range of options: by altering only a few nucleotides from billions found in the genomes of living cells, altering the full allele or by inserting a new gene in a targeted region of the genome. Due to its precision, gene editing is more precise than either conventional crop breeding methods or standard genetic engineering methods. Thus this technology is a very powerful tool that can be used toward securing the world's food supply. In addition to improving the nutritional value of crops, it is the most effective way to produce crops that can resist pests and thrive in tough climates. There are 3 types of modifications produced by genome editing; Type I includes altering a few nucleotides, Type II involves replacing an allele with a pre-existing one and Type III allows for the insertion of new gene(s) in predetermined regions in the genome. Because most genome-editing techniques can leave behind traces of DNA alterations evident in a small number of nucleotides, crops created through gene editing could avoid the stringent regulation procedures commonly associated with GM crop development. For this reason many scientists believe plants improved with the more precise gene editing techniques will be more acceptable to the public than transgenic plants. With genome editing comes the promise of new crops being developed more rapidly with a very low risk of off-target effects. It can be performed in any laboratory with any crop, even those that have complex genomes and are not easily bred using conventional methods.

Keywords:  CRISPR/Cas; MegaN; SSN; SSR; ZFN and TALEN

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26930114      PMCID: PMC5033222          DOI: 10.1080/21645698.2015.1129937

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  GM Crops Food        ISSN: 2164-5698            Impact factor:   3.074


  99 in total

1.  Targeted mutagenesis for functional analysis of gene duplication in legumes.

Authors:  Shaun J Curtin; Justin E Anderson; Colby G Starker; Nicholas J Baltes; Dhananjay Mani; Daniel F Voytas; Robert M Stupar
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2013

2.  Targeted genome modification of crop plants using a CRISPR-Cas system.

Authors:  Qiwei Shan; Yanpeng Wang; Jun Li; Yi Zhang; Kunling Chen; Zhen Liang; Kang Zhang; Jinxing Liu; Jianzhong Jeff Xi; Jin-Long Qiu; Caixia Gao
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Transgenic Xenopus laevis embryos can be generated using phiC31 integrase.

Authors:  Bryan G Allen; Daniel L Weeks
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 28.547

4.  Non-transgenic Plant Genome Editing Using Purified Sequence-Specific Nucleases.

Authors:  Song Luo; Jin Li; Thomas J Stoddard; Nicholas J Baltes; Zachary L Demorest; Benjamin M Clasen; Andrew Coffman; Adam Retterath; Luc Mathis; Daniel F Voytas; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Mol Plant       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 13.164

Review 5.  ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering.

Authors:  Thomas Gaj; Charles A Gersbach; Carlos F Barbas
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 19.536

6.  A novel TALE nuclease scaffold enables high genome editing activity in combination with low toxicity.

Authors:  Claudio Mussolino; Robert Morbitzer; Fabienne Lütge; Nadine Dannemann; Thomas Lahaye; Toni Cathomen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Efficient genome editing in plants using a CRISPR/Cas system.

Authors:  Zhengyan Feng; Botao Zhang; Wona Ding; Xiaodong Liu; Dong-Lei Yang; Pengliang Wei; Fengqiu Cao; Shihua Zhu; Feng Zhang; Yanfei Mao; Jian-Kang Zhu
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 25.617

8.  TALEN and CRISPR/Cas Genome Editing Systems: Tools of Discovery.

Authors:  A A Nemudryi; K R Valetdinova; S P Medvedev; S M Zakian
Journal:  Acta Naturae       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.845

9.  High-frequency modification of plant genes using engineered zinc-finger nucleases.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Townsend; David A Wright; Ronnie J Winfrey; Fengli Fu; Morgan L Maeder; J Keith Joung; Daniel F Voytas
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Molecular Mechanisms Behind the Chemopreventive Effects of Anthocyanidins.

Authors:  De-Xing Hou; Makoto Fujii; Norihiko Terahara; Makoto Yoshimoto
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2004
View more
  24 in total

1.  Estimating the cost of regulating genome edited crops: expert judgment and overconfidence.

Authors:  Rim Lassoued; Peter W B Phillips; Stuart J Smyth; Hayley Hesseln
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 3.074

Review 2.  CRISPR-based genome editing in wheat: a comprehensive review and future prospects.

Authors:  Rakesh Kumar; Amandeep Kaur; Ankita Pandey; H M Mamrutha; G P Singh
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 2.316

Review 3.  Microbial-assisted and genomic-assisted breeding: a two way approach for the improvement of nutritional quality traits in agricultural crops.

Authors:  Ajay Kumar Chandra; Amarjeet Kumar; Alka Bharati; Rini Joshi; Aparna Agrawal; Sumit Kumar
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 4.  Application and future perspective of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in fruit crops.

Authors:  Junhui Zhou; Dongdong Li; Guoming Wang; Fuxi Wang; Merixia Kunjal; Dirk Joldersma; Zhongchi Liu
Journal:  J Integr Plant Biol       Date:  2019-04-19       Impact factor: 7.061

Review 5.  Drought tolerance improvement in Solanum lycopersicum: an insight into "OMICS" approaches and genome editing.

Authors:  Sima Taheri; Saikat Gantait; Parisa Azizi; Purabi Mazumdar
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 6.  A critical assessment of regulatory triggers for products of biotechnology: Product vs. process.

Authors:  Alan McHughen
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.074

Review 7.  CRISPR-Cas9: Tool for Qualitative and Quantitative Plant Genome Editing.

Authors:  Ali Noman; Muhammad Aqeel; Shuilin He
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 8.  Genome editing of crops: A renewed opportunity for food security.

Authors:  Fawzy Georges; Heather Ray
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 3.074

Review 9.  Genetic Transformation and Genomic Resources for Next-Generation Precise Genome Engineering in Vegetable Crops.

Authors:  Teodoro Cardi; Nunzio D'Agostino; Pasquale Tripodi
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 10.  Applications and Major Achievements of Genome Editing in Vegetable Crops: A Review.

Authors:  Young-Cheon Kim; Yeeun Kang; Eun-Young Yang; Myeong-Cheoul Cho; Roland Schafleitner; Jeong Hwan Lee; Seonghoe Jang
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 5.753

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.