Literature DB >> 26928896

Participants and Study Decliners' Perspectives About the Risks of Participating in a Clinical Trial of Whole Genome Sequencing.

Jill Oliver Robinson1, Thomas M Carroll2, Lindsay Z Feuerman3, Denise L Perry4, Lily Hoffman-Andrews4, Rebecca C Walsh4, Kurt D Christensen4, Robert C Green5, Amy L McGuire3.   

Abstract

An increasing number of individuals are being recruited to whole genome sequencing (WGS) research. When asked hypothetically, the majority of the public express willingness to participate in this type of research, yet little is known about how many individuals will actually consent to research participation or what they perceive the risks to be. The MedSeq Project is a clinical trial exploring WGS in clinical care. We documented primary reason(s) for declining participation and reviewed audio-recorded informed consent sessions to identify participants' concerns. Of 514 individuals recruited, 173 (34%) actively declined, 205 (40%) enrolled, and the remaining 136 (26%) were ineligible, unresponsive or waitlisted. Although the majority of active decliners cited logistical barriers, 40% cited risks related to the ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) of WGS research. Participants similarly discussed ELSI-related concerns but felt the potential benefits of participation outweighed the risks. Findings provide insight into the perspectives of potential WGS research participants and identify potential barriers to participation.
© The Author(s) 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  informed consent; participant and decliner perspectives; risks of WGS research; whole genome sequencing

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26928896      PMCID: PMC4842131          DOI: 10.1177/1556264615624078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics        ISSN: 1556-2646            Impact factor:   1.742


  14 in total

1.  Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.

Authors:  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh; Sarah E Shannon
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2005-11

Review 2.  Communicating genetic risk information for common disorders in the era of genomic medicine.

Authors:  Denise M Lautenbach; Kurt D Christensen; Jeffrey A Sparks; Robert C Green
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 8.929

3.  GINA, genetic discrimination, and genomic medicine.

Authors:  Robert C Green; Denise Lautenbach; Amy L McGuire
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Genomic data in the electronic medical record: perspectives from a biobank community advisory board.

Authors:  Brittany C Kimball; Katherine E Nowakowski; Karen J Maschke; Jennifer B McCormick
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 1.742

Review 5.  Enduring and emerging challenges of informed consent.

Authors:  Christine Grady
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  The ClinSeq Project: piloting large-scale genome sequencing for research in genomic medicine.

Authors:  Leslie G Biesecker; James C Mullikin; Flavia M Facio; Clesson Turner; Praveen F Cherukuri; Robert W Blakesley; Gerard G Bouffard; Peter S Chines; Pedro Cruz; Nancy F Hansen; Jamie K Teer; Baishali Maskeri; Alice C Young; Teri A Manolio; Alexander F Wilson; Toren Finkel; Paul Hwang; Andrew Arai; Alan T Remaley; Vandana Sachdev; Robert Shamburek; Richard O Cannon; Eric D Green
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Validation of a decision regret scale.

Authors:  Jamie C Brehaut; Annette M O'Connor; Timothy J Wood; Thomas F Hack; Laura Siminoff; Elisa Gordon; Deb Feldman-Stewart
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.583

8.  Patient feedback and early outcome data with a novel tiered-binned model for multiplex breast cancer susceptibility testing.

Authors:  Angela R Bradbury; Linda J Patrick-Miller; Brian L Egleston; Laura DiGiovanni; Jamie Brower; Diana Harris; Evelyn M Stevens; Kara N Maxwell; Abha Kulkarni; Tyler Chavez; Amanda Brandt; Jessica M Long; Jacquelyn Powers; Jill E Stopfer; Katherine L Nathanson; Susan M Domchek
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  The emerging need for family-centric initiatives for obtaining consent in personal genome research.

Authors:  Jusaku Minari; Harriet Teare; Colin Mitchell; Jane Kaye; Kazuto Kato
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 11.117

10.  The MedSeq Project: a randomized trial of integrating whole genome sequencing into clinical medicine.

Authors:  Jason L Vassy; Denise M Lautenbach; Heather M McLaughlin; Sek Won Kong; Kurt D Christensen; Joel Krier; Isaac S Kohane; Lindsay Z Feuerman; Jennifer Blumenthal-Barby; J Scott Roberts; Lisa Soleymani Lehmann; Carolyn Y Ho; Peter A Ubel; Calum A MacRae; Christine E Seidman; Michael F Murray; Amy L McGuire; Heidi L Rehm; Robert C Green
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 2.279

View more
  21 in total

1.  Commentary: "My Identical Twin Sequenced Our Genome".

Authors:  Sabrina A Suckiel; Randi E Zinberg
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Reasons for Declining Preconception Expanded Carrier Screening Using Genome Sequencing.

Authors:  Marian J Gilmore; Jennifer Schneider; James V Davis; Tia L Kauffman; Michael C Leo; Kellene Bergen; Jacob A Reiss; Patricia Himes; Elissa Morris; Carol Young; Carmit McMullen; Benjamin S Wilfond; Katrina A B Goddard
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Preferences for the Return of Individual Results From Research on Pediatric Biobank Samples.

Authors:  Kurt D Christensen; Sarah K Savage; Noelle L Huntington; Elissa R Weitzman; Sonja I Ziniel; Phoebe L Bacon; Cara N Cacioppo; Robert C Green; Ingrid A Holm
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.742

4.  Much ado about nothing: A qualitative study of the experiences of an average-risk population receiving results of exome sequencing.

Authors:  Shannon Rego; Orit Dagan-Rosenfeld; Stephanie A Bivona; Michael P Snyder; Kelly E Ormond
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Expanded genetic carrier screening in clinical practice: a current survey of patient impressions and attitudes.

Authors:  Nigel Pereira; Michelle Wood; Emerly Luong; Allison Briggs; Michael Galloway; Rose A Maxwell; Steven R Lindheim
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Why Patients Decline Genomic Sequencing Studies: Experiences from the CSER Consortium.

Authors:  Laura M Amendola; Jill O Robinson; Ragan Hart; Sawona Biswas; Kaitlyn Lee; Barbara A Bernhardt; Kelly East; Marian J Gilmore; Tia L Kauffman; Katie L Lewis; Myra Roche; Sarah Scollon; Julia Wynn; Carrie Blout
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  How Can Law and Policy Advance Quality in Genomic Analysis and Interpretation for Clinical Care?

Authors:  Barbara J Evans; Gail Javitt; Ralph Hall; Megan Robertson; Pilar Ossorio; Susan M Wolf; Thomas Morgan; Ellen Wright Clayton
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.718

8.  The Impact of Whole-Genome Sequencing on the Primary Care and Outcomes of Healthy Adult Patients: A Pilot Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Jason L Vassy; Kurt D Christensen; Erica F Schonman; Carrie L Blout; Jill O Robinson; Joel B Krier; Pamela M Diamond; Matthew Lebo; Kalotina Machini; Danielle R Azzariti; Dmitry Dukhovny; David W Bates; Calum A MacRae; Michael F Murray; Heidi L Rehm; Amy L McGuire; Robert C Green
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium: Accelerating Evidence-Based Practice of Genomic Medicine.

Authors:  Robert C Green; Katrina A B Goddard; Gail P Jarvik; Laura M Amendola; Paul S Appelbaum; Jonathan S Berg; Barbara A Bernhardt; Leslie G Biesecker; Sawona Biswas; Carrie L Blout; Kevin M Bowling; Kyle B Brothers; Wylie Burke; Charlisse F Caga-Anan; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Wendy K Chung; Ellen W Clayton; Gregory M Cooper; Kelly East; James P Evans; Stephanie M Fullerton; Levi A Garraway; Jeremy R Garrett; Stacy W Gray; Gail E Henderson; Lucia A Hindorff; Ingrid A Holm; Michelle Huckaby Lewis; Carolyn M Hutter; Pasi A Janne; Steven Joffe; David Kaufman; Bartha M Knoppers; Barbara A Koenig; Ian D Krantz; Teri A Manolio; Laurence McCullough; Jean McEwen; Amy McGuire; Donna Muzny; Richard M Myers; Deborah A Nickerson; Jeffrey Ou; Donald W Parsons; Gloria M Petersen; Sharon E Plon; Heidi L Rehm; J Scott Roberts; Dan Robinson; Joseph S Salama; Sarah Scollon; Richard R Sharp; Brian Shirts; Nancy B Spinner; Holly K Tabor; Peter Tarczy-Hornoch; David L Veenstra; Nikhil Wagle; Karen Weck; Benjamin S Wilfond; Kirk Wilhelmsen; Susan M Wolf; Julia Wynn; Joon-Ho Yu
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Associations of perceived norms with intentions to learn genomic sequencing results: Roles for attitudes and ambivalence.

Authors:  Allecia E Reid; Jennifer M Taber; Rebecca A Ferrer; Barbara B Biesecker; Katie L Lewis; Leslie G Biesecker; William M P Klein
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 4.267

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.