Literature DB >> 25747687

Genomic data in the electronic medical record: perspectives from a biobank community advisory board.

Brittany C Kimball1, Katherine E Nowakowski1, Karen J Maschke2, Jennifer B McCormick3.   

Abstract

A proof of principle pharmacogenomic translational study was used as a case example to explore Biobank Community Advisory Board (CAB) member views about placing genomic information into the medical record and to establish how CAB input could affect research design. CAB members expressed enthusiasm for the potential benefit of the research discussed, yet voiced concerns regarding the recruitment and consent materials. They discussed the value of genomic research and its clinical utility; the risk of genetic discrimination; and personal ownership of genomic data. Members distinguished between indirect benefits to future generations and individual risk to research participants. Feedback was used to revise the recruitment and consent materials. Results highlight tensions reported between the public's support for genomic research and concerns with genomic information in the medical record and its use in medical decision-making.
© The Author(s) 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  community advisory board; genomics/genetics; medical record; pharmacogenomics study

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25747687     DOI: 10.1177/1556264614553922

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics        ISSN: 1556-2646            Impact factor:   1.742


  15 in total

1.  Automatic Placement of Genomic Research Results in Medical Records: Do Researchers Have a Duty? Should Participants Have a Choice?

Authors:  Anya E R Prince; John M Conley; Arlene M Davis; Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz; R Jean Cadigan
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.718

2.  A Culture of Understanding: Reflections and Suggestions from a Genomics Research Community Board.

Authors:  Benjamin Kaplan; Carolyn Caddle-Steele; Gregory Chisholm; Warria A Esmond; Kadija Ferryman; Melvin Gertner; Crispin Goytia; Diane Hauser; Lynne D Richardson; Mimsie Robinson; Carol R Horowitz
Journal:  Prog Community Health Partnersh       Date:  2017

3.  Participants and Study Decliners' Perspectives About the Risks of Participating in a Clinical Trial of Whole Genome Sequencing.

Authors:  Jill Oliver Robinson; Thomas M Carroll; Lindsay Z Feuerman; Denise L Perry; Lily Hoffman-Andrews; Rebecca C Walsh; Kurt D Christensen; Robert C Green; Amy L McGuire
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2016-02-28       Impact factor: 1.742

Review 4.  Four Actionable Bottlenecks and Potential Solutions to Translating Psychiatric Genetics Research: An Expert Review.

Authors:  Jessica L Bourdon; Rachel A Davies; Elizabeth C Long
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 2.000

5.  Integrating pharmacogenomics into the electronic health record by implementing genomic indicators.

Authors:  Pedro J Caraballo; Joseph A Sutton; Jyothsna Giri; Jessica A Wright; Wayne T Nicholson; Iftikhar J Kullo; Mark A Parkulo; Suzette J Bielinski; Ann M Moyer
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  In-vivo design feedback and perceived utility of a genetically-informed smoking risk tool among current smokers in the community.

Authors:  Jessica L Bourdon; Amelia Dorsey; Maia Zalik; Amanda Pietka; Patricia Salyer; Michael J Bray; Laura J Bierut; Alex T Ramsey
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 3.063

7.  Public trust in health information sharing: implications for biobanking and electronic health record systems.

Authors:  Jodyn Platt; Sharon Kardia
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2015-02-03

8.  Assessing Stakeholder Perceptions of the Utility of Genetic Information for the Clinical Care of Mental Health Disorders: We Have a Will but Need to See the Way.

Authors:  Jessica L Bourdon; John M Hettema; Elizabeth C Prom-Wormley; Michael A Southam-Gerow
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2021-03

9.  Improving Community Advisory Board Engagement in Precision Medicine Research to Reduce Health Disparities.

Authors:  Erin Connors; Rebecca Selove; Juan Canedo; Maureen Sanderson; Pamela Hull; Marilyn Adams; Ila McDermott; Calvin Barlow; Denice Johns-Porter; Caree McAfee; Karen Gilliam; Oscar Miller; Nora Cox; Mary Kay Fadden; Stephen King; Hilary Tindle
Journal:  J Health Dispar Res Pract       Date:  2019

10.  Choosing between Higher and Lower Resolution Microarrays: do Pregnant Women Have Sufficient Knowledge to Make Informed Choices Consistent with their Attitude?

Authors:  S L van der Steen; E M Bunnik; M G Polak; K E M Diderich; J Verhagen-Visser; L C P Govaerts; M Joosten; M F C M Knapen; A T J I Go; D Van Opstal; M I Srebniak; R J H Galjaard; A Tibben; S R Riedijk
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.