Literature DB >> 28315134

Reasons for Declining Preconception Expanded Carrier Screening Using Genome Sequencing.

Marian J Gilmore1, Jennifer Schneider2, James V Davis2, Tia L Kauffman2, Michael C Leo2, Kellene Bergen2, Jacob A Reiss2, Patricia Himes3, Elissa Morris3, Carol Young2, Carmit McMullen2, Benjamin S Wilfond4, Katrina A B Goddard2.   

Abstract

Genomic carrier screening can identify more disease-associated variants than existing carrier screening methodologies, but its utility from patients' perspective is not yet established. A randomized controlled trial for preconception genomic carrier screening provided an opportunity to understand patients' decisions about whether to accept or decline testing. We administered a survey to potential genomic carrier screening recipients who declined participation (N = 240) to evaluate their reasons for doing so. Two thirds of women declined participation. We identified major themes describing reasons these individuals declined to participate; the most common were time limitation, lack of interest, not wanting to know the information, and potential cause of worry or anxiety. Most women eligible for genomic carrier screening indicated that their reasons for opting out were due to logistical issues rather than opposing the rationale for testing. As expanded carrier screening and genomic sequencing become a more routine part of clinical care, it is anticipated there will be variable uptake from individuals for this testing. Thus, the advancement of clinical carrier screening from single genes, to expanded screening panels, to an exome- or genome-wide platform, will require approaches that respect individual choice to receive genetic testing for reproductive risk assessment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Declining genetic testing; Genome sequencing; Genomic medicine; Patient testing decisions; Preconception expanded carrier screening; Qualitative research; Reproductive decisions

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28315134      PMCID: PMC5601030          DOI: 10.1007/s10897-017-0074-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  17 in total

1.  ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 78: hemoglobinopathies in pregnancy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 2.  Factors affecting decisions to accept or decline cystic fibrosis carrier testing/screening: a theory-guided systematic review.

Authors:  Lei-Shih Chen; Patricia Goodson
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 3.  ACOG Committee Opinion No. 486: Update on carrier screening for cystic fibrosis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Expanded carrier screening in reproductive medicine-points to consider: a joint statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, National Society of Genetic Counselors, Perinatal Quality Foundation, and Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine.

Authors:  Janice G Edwards; Gerald Feldman; James Goldberg; Anthony R Gregg; Mary E Norton; Nancy C Rose; Adele Schneider; Katie Stoll; Ronald Wapner; Michael S Watson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Carrier testing for severe childhood recessive diseases by next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Callum J Bell; Darrell L Dinwiddie; Neil A Miller; Shannon L Hateley; Elena E Ganusova; Joann Mudge; Ray J Langley; Lu Zhang; Clarence C Lee; Faye D Schilkey; Vrunda Sheth; Jimmy E Woodward; Heather E Peckham; Gary P Schroth; Ryan W Kim; Stephen F Kingsmore
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 17.956

6.  ACOG Committee Opinion No. 469: Carrier screening for fragile X syndrome.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Patients' ratings of genetic conditions validate a taxonomy to simplify decisions about preconception carrier screening via genome sequencing.

Authors:  Michael C Leo; Carmit McMullen; Benjamin S Wilfond; Frances L Lynch; Jacob A Reiss; Marian J Gilmore; Patricia Himes; Tia L Kauffman; James V Davis; Gail P Jarvik; Jonathan S Berg; Cary Harding; Kathleen A Kennedy; Dana Kostiner Simpson; Denise I Quigley; C Sue Richards; Alan F Rope; Katrina A B Goddard
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 2.802

8.  "Is It Worth Knowing?" Focus Group Participants' Perceived Utility of Genomic Preconception Carrier Screening.

Authors:  Jennifer L Schneider; Katrina A B Goddard; James Davis; Benjamin Wilfond; Tia L Kauffman; Jacob A Reiss; Marian Gilmore; Patricia Himes; Frances L Lynch; Michael C Leo; Carmit McMullen
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-06-21       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Population-based carrier screening for cystic fibrosis: a systematic review of 23 years of research.

Authors:  Liane Ioannou; Belinda J McClaren; John Massie; Sharon Lewis; Sylvia A Metcalfe; Laura Forrest; Martin B Delatycki
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  It's complicated: criteria for policy decisions for the clinical integration of genome-scale sequencing for reproductive decision making.

Authors:  Benjamin S Wilfond; Katrina Ab Goddard
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.183

View more
  15 in total

1.  Expanded genetic carrier screening in clinical practice: a current survey of patient impressions and attitudes.

Authors:  Nigel Pereira; Michelle Wood; Emerly Luong; Allison Briggs; Michael Galloway; Rose A Maxwell; Steven R Lindheim
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Why Patients Decline Genomic Sequencing Studies: Experiences from the CSER Consortium.

Authors:  Laura M Amendola; Jill O Robinson; Ragan Hart; Sawona Biswas; Kaitlyn Lee; Barbara A Bernhardt; Kelly East; Marian J Gilmore; Tia L Kauffman; Katie L Lewis; Myra Roche; Sarah Scollon; Julia Wynn; Carrie Blout
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Motivations and concerns of patients considering participation in an implementation study of a hereditary cancer risk assessment program in diverse primary care settings.

Authors:  Devan M Duenas; Kelly J Shipman; Kathryn M Porter; Elizabeth Shuster; Claudia Guerra; Ana Reyes; Tia L Kauffman; Jessica Ezzell Hunter; Katrina A B Goddard; Benjamin S Wilfond; Stephanie A Kraft
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 4.  Expanded carrier screening: counseling and considerations.

Authors:  Teresa N Sparks
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2019-11-02       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Pregnant Women's Perspectives on Expanded Carrier Screening.

Authors:  Lauren Propst; Gwendolyn Connor; Megan Hinton; Tabitha Poorvu; Jeffrey Dungan
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Female and male perspectives on male partner roles in expanded carrier screening.

Authors:  Sarah Jurgensmeyer; Sarah Walterman; Andrew Wagner; Kenny Wong; Annie Bao; Sarah Stueber; Sara Spencer
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Current attitudes and preconceptions towards expanded carrier screening in the Eastern Chinese reproductive-aged population.

Authors:  Fang Zhang; Jianxin Tan; Binbin Shao; Tao Jiang; Ran Zhou; Yan Wang; Jingjing Zhang; Fengchang Qiao; Xiuqing Ji; Ya Wang; Ping Hu; Zhengfeng Xu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Preconception expanded carrier screening: a focus group study with relatives of mucopolysaccharidosis type III patients and the general population.

Authors:  Thirsa Conijn; Ivy van Dijke; Lotte Haverman; Phillis Lakeman; Frits A Wijburg; Lidewij Henneman
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2021-03-22

9.  Exploring the use of a Comic for Education about Expanded Carrier Screening among a Diverse Group of Mothers.

Authors:  Erin Rothwell; Sydney Cheek-O'Donnell; Erin Johnson; Alena Wilson; Rebecca A Anderson; Jeffrey Botkin
Journal:  J Commun Healthc       Date:  2021-05-06

10.  Assessment of willingness to pay for expanded carrier screening among women and couples undergoing preconception carrier screening.

Authors:  Elizabeth V Clarke; Jennifer L Schneider; Frances Lynch; Tia L Kauffman; Michael C Leo; Ana G Rosales; John F Dickerson; Elizabeth Shuster; Benjamin S Wilfond; Katrina A B Goddard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.