Shing M Lee1, Daniel Backenroth2, Ying Kuen Ken Cheung2, Dawn L Hershman2, Diana Vulih2, Barry Anderson2, Percy Ivy2, Lori Minasian2. 1. Shing M. Lee, Daniel Backenroth, Ying Kuen Ken Cheung, and Dawn L. Hershman, Columbia University, New York, NY; Diana Vulih and Barry Anderson, Theradex Systems, Princeton, NJ; and Percy Ivy and Lori Minasian, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD. sml2114@columbia.edu. 2. Shing M. Lee, Daniel Backenroth, Ying Kuen Ken Cheung, and Dawn L. Hershman, Columbia University, New York, NY; Diana Vulih and Barry Anderson, Theradex Systems, Princeton, NJ; and Percy Ivy and Lori Minasian, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The current dose-finding methodology for estimating the maximum tolerated dose of investigational anticancer agents is based on the cytotoxic chemotherapy paradigm. Molecularly targeted agents (MTAs) have different toxicity profiles, which may lead to more long-lasting mild or moderate toxicities as well as to late-onset and cumulative toxicities. Several approved MTAs have been poorly tolerated during long-term administration, leading to postmarketing dose optimization studies to re-evaluate the optimal treatment dose. Using data from completed bortezomib dose-finding trials, we explore its toxicity profile, optimize its dose, and examine the appropriateness of current designs for identifying an optimal dose. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We classified the toxicities captured from 481 patients in 14 bortezomib dose-finding studies conducted through the National Cancer Institute Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, computed the incidence of late-onset toxicities, and compared the incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) among groups of patients receiving different doses of bortezomib. RESULTS: A total of 13,008 toxicities were captured: 46% of patients' first DLTs and 88% of dose reductions or discontinuations of treatment because of toxicity were observed after the first cycle. Moreover, for the approved dose of 1.3 mg/m(2), the estimated cumulative incidence of DLT was > 50%, and the estimated cumulative incidence of dose reduction or treatment discontinuation because of toxicity was nearly 40%. CONCLUSIONS: When considering the entire course of treatment, the approved bortezomib dose exceeds the conventional ceiling DLT rate of 20% to 33%. Retrospective analysis of trial data provides an opportunity for dose optimization of MTAs. Future dose-finding studies of MTAs should take into account late-onset toxicities to ensure that a tolerable dose is identified for future efficacy and comparative trials.
PURPOSE: The current dose-finding methodology for estimating the maximum tolerated dose of investigational anticancer agents is based on the cytotoxic chemotherapy paradigm. Molecularly targeted agents (MTAs) have different toxicity profiles, which may lead to more long-lasting mild or moderate toxicities as well as to late-onset and cumulative toxicities. Several approved MTAs have been poorly tolerated during long-term administration, leading to postmarketing dose optimization studies to re-evaluate the optimal treatment dose. Using data from completed bortezomib dose-finding trials, we explore its toxicity profile, optimize its dose, and examine the appropriateness of current designs for identifying an optimal dose. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We classified the toxicities captured from 481 patients in 14 bortezomib dose-finding studies conducted through the National Cancer Institute Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, computed the incidence of late-onset toxicities, and compared the incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) among groups of patients receiving different doses of bortezomib. RESULTS: A total of 13,008 toxicities were captured: 46% of patients' first DLTs and 88% of dose reductions or discontinuations of treatment because of toxicity were observed after the first cycle. Moreover, for the approved dose of 1.3 mg/m(2), the estimated cumulative incidence of DLT was > 50%, and the estimated cumulative incidence of dose reduction or treatment discontinuation because of toxicity was nearly 40%. CONCLUSIONS: When considering the entire course of treatment, the approved bortezomib dose exceeds the conventional ceiling DLT rate of 20% to 33%. Retrospective analysis of trial data provides an opportunity for dose optimization of MTAs. Future dose-finding studies of MTAs should take into account late-onset toxicities to ensure that a tolerable dose is identified for future efficacy and comparative trials.
Authors: Sophie Postel-Vinay; Carlos Gomez-Roca; L Rhoda Molife; Bhavesh Anghan; Antonin Levy; Ian Judson; Johann De Bono; Jean-Charles Soria; Stan Kaye; Xavier Paoletti Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-03-28 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Ticiana B Leal; Scot C Remick; Chris H Takimoto; Ramesh K Ramanathan; Angela Davies; Merrill J Egorin; Anne Hamilton; Patricia A LoRusso; Stephen Shibata; Heinz-Josef Lenz; James Mier; John Sarantopoulos; Sridhar Mani; John J Wright; S Percy Ivy; Rachel Neuwirth; Lisa von Moltke; Karthik Venkatakrishnan; Daniel Mulkerin Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2011-04-09 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Angela M Davies; Christopher Ruel; Primo N Lara; Derick H Lau; Paul H Gumerlock; Richard Bold; Stephen Shibata; Heinz-Josef Lenz; David P Schenkein; David R Gandara Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Wells A Messersmith; Sharyn D Baker; Lance Lassiter; Rana A Sullivan; Kimberly Dinh; Virna I Almuete; John J Wright; Ross C Donehower; Michael A Carducci; Deborah K Armstrong Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2006-02-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Paul M Barr; Pingfu Fu; Hillard M Lazarus; Nancy Horvath; Stanton L Gerson; Omer N Koc; Nizar J Bahlis; Michael R Snell; Afshin Dowlati; Brenda W Cooper Journal: Br J Haematol Date: 2009-06-29 Impact factor: 6.998
Authors: Sophie Postel-Vinay; Laurence Collette; Xavier Paoletti; Elisa Rizzo; Christophe Massard; David Olmos; Camilla Fowst; Bernard Levy; Pierre Mancini; Denis Lacombe; Percy Ivy; Lesley Seymour; Christophe Le Tourneau; Lillian L Siu; Stan B Kaye; Jaap Verweij; Jean-Charles Soria Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2014-05-28 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Nolan A Wages; Thomas M Braun; Daniel P Normolle; Matthew J Schipper Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2022-07-01 Impact factor: 8.013
Authors: Gita Thanarajasingam; Lori M Minasian; Frederic Baron; Franco Cavalli; R Angelo De Claro; Amylou C Dueck; Tarec C El-Galaly; Neil Everest; Jan Geissler; Christian Gisselbrecht; John Gribben; Mary Horowitz; S Percy Ivy; Caron A Jacobson; Armand Keating; Paul G Kluetz; Aviva Krauss; Yok Lam Kwong; Richard F Little; Francois-Xavier Mahon; Matthew J Matasar; María-Victoria Mateos; Kristen McCullough; Robert S Miller; Mohamad Mohty; Philippe Moreau; Lindsay M Morton; Sumimasa Nagai; Simon Rule; Jeff Sloan; Pieter Sonneveld; Carrie A Thompson; Kyriaki Tzogani; Flora E van Leeuwen; Galina Velikova; Diego Villa; John R Wingard; Sophie Wintrich; John F Seymour; Thomas M Habermann Journal: Lancet Haematol Date: 2018-06-18 Impact factor: 18.959
Authors: Shing M Lee; Dawn L Hershman; Jieling Miao; Xiaobo Zhong; Joseph M Unger; Ying Kuen Ken Cheung Journal: Cancer Date: 2017-11-07 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Jin Hee Lee; Kyung-Ho Jung; Cung Hoa Thien Quach; Jin Won Park; Seung Hwan Moon; Young Seok Cho; Kyung-Han Lee Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-08-16 Impact factor: 4.379