Literature DB >> 29140414

Dose-finding designs for cumulative toxicities using multiple constraints.

Shing M Lee1, Moreno Ursino2, Ying Kuen Cheung1, Sarah Zohar2.   

Abstract

This article addresses the concern regarding late-onset dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), moderate toxicities below the threshold of a DLT and cumulative toxicities that may lead to a DLT, which are mostly disregarded or handled in an ad hoc manner when determining the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in dose-finding cancer clinical trials. An extension of the Time-to-Event Continual Reassessment Method (TITE-CRM) which allows for the specification of toxicity constraints on both DLT and moderate toxicities, and can account for partial information is proposed. The method is illustrated in the context of an Erlotinib dose-finding trial with low DLT rates, but a significant number of moderate toxicities leading to treatment discontinuation in later cycles. Based on simulations, our method performs well at selecting the dose level that satisfies both the DLT and moderate-toxicity constraints. Moreover, it has similar probability of correct selection compared to the TITE-CRM when the true MTD based on DLT only and the true MTD based on grade 2 or higher toxicities alone coincide, but reduces the probability of recommending a dose above the MTD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 29140414      PMCID: PMC6296314          DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxx059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biostatistics        ISSN: 1465-4644            Impact factor:   5.899


  20 in total

1.  Continual reassessment method with multiple toxicity constraints.

Authors:  Shing M Lee; Bin Cheng; Ying Kuen Cheung
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Dose finding for continuous and ordinal outcomes with a monotone objective function: a unified approach.

Authors:  Anastasia Ivanova; Se Hee Kim
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Erlotinib in combination with pemetrexed for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a phase I dose-finding study.

Authors:  M Ranson; M Reck; A Anthoney; A-R Hanauske; E Dean; I Melezinek; G Klingelschmitt; H Kletzl; J Blatter; C Twelves
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  Proportional odds model for dose-finding clinical trial designs with ordinal toxicity grading.

Authors:  Emily M Van Meter; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer; Dipankar Bandyopadhyay
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Determining a maximum-tolerated schedule of a cytotoxic agent.

Authors:  Thomas M Braun; Zheng Yuan; Peter F Thall
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Toxicity burden score: a novel approach to summarize multiple toxic effects.

Authors:  S M Lee; D L Hershman; P Martin; J P Leonard; Y K Cheung
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2011-05-02       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Dose-finding clinical trial design for ordinal toxicity grades using the continuation ratio model: an extension of the continual reassessment method.

Authors:  Emily M Van Meter; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer; Dipankar Bandyopadhyay
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 2.486

8.  Sequential designs for phase I clinical trials with late-onset toxicities.

Authors:  Y K Cheung; R Chappell
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Simultaneously optimizing dose and schedule of a new cytotoxic agent.

Authors:  Thomas M Braun; Peter F Thall; Hoang Nguyen; Marcos de Lima
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.486

10.  Model calibration in the continual reassessment method.

Authors:  Shing M Lee
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.486

View more
  3 in total

1.  Seamless phase I/II design for novel anticancer agents with competing disease progression.

Authors:  Lucie Biard; Shing M Lee; Bin Cheng
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 2.497

2.  Designing Dose-Finding Phase I Clinical Trials: Top 10 Questions That Should Be Discussed With Your Statistician.

Authors:  Shing M Lee; Nolan A Wages; Karyn A Goodman; A Craig Lockhart
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2021-02-01

3.  Bayesian modeling of a bivariate toxicity outcome for early phase oncology trials evaluating dose regimens.

Authors:  Emma Gerard; Sarah Zohar; Christelle Lorenzato; Moreno Ursino; Marie-Karelle Riviere
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 2.497

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.