Literature DB >> 22752889

Outcomes following acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding in relation to time to endoscopy: results from a nationwide study.

V Jairath1, B C Kahan, R F A Logan, S A Hearnshaw, C J Doré, S P L Travis, M F Murphy, K R Palmer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Despite the established efficacy of therapeutic endoscopy, the optimum timeframe for performing endoscopy in patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) remains unclear. The aim of the current audit study was to examine the relationship between time to endoscopy and clinical outcomes in patients presenting with NVUGIB. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study was a prospective national audit performed in 212 UK hospitals. Regression models examined the relationship between time to endoscopy and mortality, rebleeding, need for surgery, and length of hospital stay.
RESULTS: In 4478 patients, earlier endoscopy ( < 12 hours) was not associated with a lower mortality or need for surgery compared with later ( > 24 hours) endoscopy (odds ratio [OR] for mortality 0.98, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.88 - 1.09 for endoscopy > 24 hours vs. < 12 hours; P = 0.70). In patients receiving therapeutic endoscopy, there was a nonsignificant trend towards an increase in rebleeding associated with later endoscopy (OR 1.13, 95 %CI 0.97 - 1.32 for endoscopy > 24 hours vs. < 12 hours), with the converse seen in patients not requiring therapeutic endoscopy (OR 0.83, 95 %CI 0.73 - 0.95 for endoscopy > 24 hours vs. < 12 hours; interaction P = 0.003). Later endoscopy ( > 24 hours) was associated with an increase in risk-adjusted length of hospital stay (1.7 days longer, 95 %CI 1.39 - 1.99 vs. < 12 hours; P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Earlier endoscopy was not associated with a reduction in mortality or need for surgery. However, it was associated with an increased efficiency of care and potentially improved control of hemorrhage in higher risk patients, supporting the routine use of early endoscopy unless specific contraindications exist. These results may help inform the debate about emergency endoscopy service provision. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22752889     DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1309736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  25 in total

Review 1.  Upper gastrointestinal bleeding risk scores: Who, when and why?

Authors:  Sara Monteiro; Tiago Cúrdia Gonçalves; Joana Magalhães; José Cotter
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2016-02-15

2.  Comparison of AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford score, and Rockall score in a European series of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: performance when predicting in-hospital and delayed mortality.

Authors:  Juan G Martínez-Cara; Rita Jiménez-Rosales; Margarita Úbeda-Muñoz; Mercedes López de Hierro; Javier de Teresa; Eduardo Redondo-Cerezo
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 4.623

3.  Successful Endoscopic Hemostasis Is a Protective Factor for Rebleeding and Mortality in Patients with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

Authors:  Yong Jae Han; Jae Myung Cha; Jae Hyun Park; Jung Won Jeon; Hyun Phil Shin; Kwang Ro Joo; Joung Il Lee
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Can the presence of endoscopic high-risk stigmata be predicted before endoscopy? A multivariable analysis using the RUGBE database.

Authors:  Yen-I Chen; Jonathan Wyse; Alan Barkun; Marc Bardou; Ian Gralnek; Myriam Martel
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-06

5.  A regional massive hemorrhage protocol developed through a modified Delphi technique.

Authors:  Jeannie L Callum; Calvin H Yeh; Andrew Petrosoniak; Mark J McVey; Stephanie Cope; Troy Thompson; Victoria Chin; Keyvan Karkouti; Avery B Nathens; Kimmo Murto; Suzanne Beno; Jacob Pendergrast; Andrew McDonald; Russell MacDonald; Neill K J Adhikari; Asim Alam; Donald Arnold; Lee Barratt; Andrew Beckett; Sue Brenneman; Hina Razzaq Chaudhry; Allison Collins; Margaret Harvey; Jacinthe Lampron; Clarita Margarido; Amanda McFarlan; Barto Nascimento; Wendy Owens; Menaka Pai; Sandro Rizoli; Theodora Ruijs; Robert Skeate; Teresa Skelton; Michelle Sholzberg; Kelly Syer; Jami-Lynn Viveiros; Josee Theriault; Alan Tinmouth; Rardi Van Heest; Susan White; Michelle Zeller; Katerina Pavenski
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2019-09-03

6.  To transfuse or not to transfuse in upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage? That is the question.

Authors:  Don C Rockey
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 7.  Endoscopy for nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Ki Bae Kim; Soon Man Yoon; Sei Jin Youn
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2014-07-28

8.  [Bleeding origin, patient-related risk factors, and prognostic indicators in patients with acute gastrointestinal hemorrhages requiring intensive care treatment. A retrospective analysis from 1999 to 2010].

Authors:  A Koch; L Buendgens; H Dückers; J Bruensing; M Matthes; J Kunze; H H Lutz; T Luedde; J J W Tischendorf; C Trautwein; F Tacke
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2013-03-17       Impact factor: 0.840

Review 9.  Endoscopic and angiographic management of lower gastrointestinal bleeding: Review of the published literature.

Authors:  David J Werner; Hendrik Manner; Marc Nguyen-Tat; Roman Kloeckner; Ralf Kiesslich; Nael Abusalim; Johannes W Rey
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 4.623

10.  Novel nasogastric tube-related criteria for urgent endoscopy in nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Hiroyasu Iwasaki; Takaya Shimura; Tomonori Yamada; Miho Aoki; Satoshi Nomura; Atsunori Kusakabe; Hiroshi Kanie; Tesshin Ban; Katsumi Hayashi; Takashi Joh; Etsuro Orito
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.