Literature DB >> 20083829

International consensus recommendations on the management of patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Alan N Barkun1, Marc Bardou, Ernst J Kuipers, Joseph Sung, Richard H Hunt, Myriam Martel, Paul Sinclair.   

Abstract

DESCRIPTION: A multidisciplinary group of 34 experts from 15 countries developed this update and expansion of the recommendations on the management of acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) from 2003.
METHODS: The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) process and independent ethics protocols were used. Sources of data included original and published systematic reviews; randomized, controlled trials; and abstracts up to October 2008. Quality of evidence and strength of recommendations have been rated by using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. RECOMMENDATIONS: Recommendations emphasize early risk stratification, by using validated prognostic scales, and early endoscopy (within 24 hours). Endoscopic hemostasis remains indicated for high-risk lesions, whereas data support attempts to dislodge clots with hemostatic, pharmacologic, or combination treatment of the underlying stigmata. Clips or thermocoagulation, alone or with epinephrine injection, are effective methods; epinephrine injection alone is not recommended. Second-look endoscopy may be useful in selected high-risk patients but is not routinely recommended. Preendoscopy proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy may downstage the lesion; intravenous high-dose PPI therapy after successful endoscopic hemostasis decreases both rebleeding and mortality in patients with high-risk stigmata. Although selected patients can be discharged promptly after endoscopy, high-risk patients should be hospitalized for at least 72 hours after endoscopic hemostasis. For patients with UGIB who require a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, a PPI with a cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor is preferred to reduce rebleeding. Patients with UGIB who require secondary cardiovascular prophylaxis should start receiving acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) again as soon as cardiovascular risks outweigh gastrointestinal risks (usually within 7 days); ASA plus PPI therapy is preferred over clopidogrel alone to reduce rebleeding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20083829     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-2-201001190-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  296 in total

Review 1.  Methods for avoiding proteolytic artefacts in studies of enzymes and other proteins from yeasts.

Authors:  J R Pringle
Journal:  Methods Cell Biol       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 1.441

Review 2.  Timing of rebleeding in high-risk peptic ulcer bleeding after successful hemostasis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sara El Ouali; Alan Barkun; Myriam Martel; Davide Maggio
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-11

3.  Prediction scores or gastroenterologists' Gut Feeling for triaging patients that present with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Nl de Groot; Mgh van Oijen; K Kessels; M Hemmink; Blam Weusten; R Timmer; Wl Hazen; N van Lelyveld; Wl Curvers; Lc Baak; R Verburg; Jh Bosman; Lrh de Wijkerslooth; J de Rooij; Ng Venneman; M Pennings; K van Hee; Rch Scheffer; Rl van Eijk; R Meiland; Pd Siersema; Aj Bredenoord
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.623

4.  Safety of esophagogastroduodenoscopy within 30 days of myocardial infarction: a retrospective cohort study from a Canadian tertiary centre.

Authors:  Fahad Al-Ebrahim; Khurram J Khan; Waleed Alhazzani; Ahmed Alnemer; Abdullah Alzahrani; John Marshall; David Armstrong
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.522

5.  33-year-old woman with epigastric pain and hematemesis.

Authors:  William R Miranda; Jolene M Smith; M Caroline Burton
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 7.616

6.  Ulcer: Prediction and prevention of peptic ulcer rebleeding.

Authors:  Dennis M Jensen
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 46.802

7.  Endoscopy: Risk assessment in upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Ernst J Kuipers
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 46.802

8.  Etiology and adverse outcome predictors of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in 589 patients in Nepal.

Authors:  Umid Kumar Shrestha; Subash Sapkota
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Machine Learning to Predict Outcomes in Patients with Acute Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Dennis Shung; Michael Simonov; Mark Gentry; Benjamin Au; Loren Laine
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-05-04       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  A pilot study of single-use endoscopy in screening acute gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Jae Hee Cho; Hee Man Kim; Sangheun Lee; Yu Jin Kim; Ki Jun Han; Hyeon Geun Cho; Si Young Song
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.