Literature DB >> 26923308

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a cementless short metaphyseal humeral implant without a stem: clinical and radiologic outcomes in prospective 2- to 7-year follow-up study.

Ofer Levy1, Ali Narvani2, Nir Hous2, Ruben Abraham2, Jai Relwani2, Riten Pradhan2, Juan Bruguera2, Giuseppe Sforza2, Ehud Atoun2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reverse shoulder prostheses are increasingly used in recent years for treatment of glenohumeral arthropathy with deficient rotator cuff. Bone preservation is becoming a major goal in shoulder replacement surgery. Metaphyseal humeral components without a stem were developed to minimize bone resection and preserve bone. This study evaluated the clinical and radiologic outcomes at 2 to 7 years using a novel short metaphyseal reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) prosthesis without a diaphyseal stem.
METHODS: Between 2005 and 2010, 102 consecutive patients underwent rTSA with this implant, and 98 (20 men, 78 women) were available for follow-up. Mean age was 74.4 years (range, 38-93 years). Indications were cuff tear arthropathy, 65; fracture sequelae, 12; rheumatoid arthritis, 13; failed rotator cuff repair, 3; cuff deficiency with loosening of anatomic prosthesis, 3; and acute trauma, 2; with 17 of these as revisions.
RESULTS: Patients' satisfaction (Subjective Shoulder Value) improved from 8 of 100 to 85 of 100. The Constant score improved from 14 to 59 (age- and sex-adjusted, 86; P < .0001). Range of motion improved from 47° to 129° in elevation, 10° to 51° in external rotation, and 21° to 65° in internal rotation. Radiographic analysis showed no lucencies, subsidence, or stress shielding around the humeral or glenoid components. Glenoid notching was found in 21 patients (18 grade 1-2; 3 grade 3).
CONCLUSIONS: The short metaphyseal rTSA design without a diaphyseal stem shows encouraging short- to midterm results, with excellent pain relief and shoulder function, restoration of good active range of motion, and high patient satisfaction scores. The design of this implant seems to result in improved rotational movements, low incidence of glenoid notching, and no implant loosening, subsidence, or stress shielding.
Copyright © 2016 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Shoulder; arthroplasty; bone graft impaction; cementless; glenoid notching; metaphyseal; replacement; reverse TSA; rotation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26923308     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.12.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  17 in total

Review 1.  [Reversed total shoulder arthroplasty in rotator cuff defect arthropathy].

Authors:  T Patzer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Implant Design Considerations.

Authors:  Ujash Sheth; Matthew Saltzman
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2019-12

Review 3.  Advances and Update on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Stephen G Thon; Adam J Seidl; Jonathan T Bravman; Eric C McCarty; Felix H Savoie; Rachel M Frank
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2020-02

4.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a cementless short metaphyseal humeral prosthesis without a stem: survivorship, early to mid-term clinical and radiological outcomes in a prospective study from an independent centre.

Authors:  Andreas Leonidou; Siddharth Virani; Christopher Buckle; Clarence Yeoh; Jaikumar Relwani
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-08-20

5.  Use of reverse stemless shoulder arthroplasty in a patient with multiple hereditary exostosis.

Authors:  Natalie Holmes; Siddharth Virani; Jaikumar Relwani
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-07-08

Review 6.  Stemless reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review of short- and mid-term results.

Authors:  Eva Y Liu; Dorsa Kord; Nicholas J Yee; Nolan S Horner; Latifah Al Mana; Timothy Leroux; Bashar Alolabi; Moin Khan
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2021-05-20

Review 7.  Short Stems and Stemless Shoulder Arthroplasty: Current Concepts Review.

Authors:  Berta Buch; María Vall; Paolo Consigliere; Josep Antón Guillén; Enric Cruz; Luis Natera
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2022-08

8.  Cementless metaphyseal reverse shoulder arthroplasty: our preliminary experience.

Authors:  Gian Mario Micheloni; Gianpaolo Salmaso; Mattia Berti; Sara Bortolato; Gino Zecchinato; Alberto Momoli; Stefano Giaretta
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2019-01-10

9.  Stemless shoulder arthroplasty: review of short and medium-term results.

Authors:  Alexander Upfill-Brown; Nicholas Satariano; Brian Feeley
Journal:  JSES Open Access       Date:  2019-09-16

Review 10.  The modern reverse shoulder arthroplasty and an updated systematic review for each complication: part I.

Authors:  Sarav S Shah; Benjamin T Gaal; Alexander M Roche; Surena Namdari; Brian M Grawe; Macy Lawler; Stewart Dalton; Joseph J King; Joshua Helmkamp; Grant E Garrigues; Thomas W Wright; Bradley S Schoch; Kyle Flik; Randall J Otto; Richard Jones; Andrew Jawa; Peter McCann; Joseph Abboud; Gabe Horneff; Glen Ross; Richard Friedman; Eric T Ricchetti; Douglas Boardman; Robert Z Tashjian; Lawrence V Gulotta
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-09-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.