| Literature DB >> 36258746 |
Berta Buch1,2, María Vall1,2, Paolo Consigliere3, Josep Antón Guillén1, Enric Cruz1, Luis Natera1.
Abstract
Historically, the shoulder arthroplasty humeral component has been designed for the management of infections, tumours and fractures. In all these cases the stem was needed as a scaffold. Original humeral components were not developed for use in shoulder arthritis, so these designs and derivates had a long stem. The newest humeral implants innovations consist in shortening of the implant, or even removing the whole stem, to rely on stemless fixation at the level of the metaphysis. This implies the advantages of preserved bone stock, less stress shielding, eliminating the diaphyseal stress riser, easier implant removal at revision, and humeral component placement independent from the humeral diaphyseal axis. Nowadays, surgeons try to balance the need for a stable fixation of the humeral component with the potential need for revision surgery. Complications of revision shoulder arthroplasty are related to the need for removing a well-fixed humeral stem, the length of the procedure, and the need to treat severe bone loss.Entities:
Keywords: Bone preservation; Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty; Revision surgery; Short stems; Shoulder resurfacing; Stemless shoulder replacement; Total shoulder arthroplasty
Year: 2022 PMID: 36258746 PMCID: PMC9569137 DOI: 10.22038/ABJS.2021.53555.2664
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Bone Jt Surg ISSN: 2345-461X