Literature DB >> 36258746

Short Stems and Stemless Shoulder Arthroplasty: Current Concepts Review.

Berta Buch1,2, María Vall1,2, Paolo Consigliere3, Josep Antón Guillén1, Enric Cruz1, Luis Natera1.   

Abstract

Historically, the shoulder arthroplasty humeral component has been designed for the management of infections, tumours and fractures. In all these cases the stem was needed as a scaffold. Original humeral components were not developed for use in shoulder arthritis, so these designs and derivates had a long stem. The newest humeral implants innovations consist in shortening of the implant, or even removing the whole stem, to rely on stemless fixation at the level of the metaphysis. This implies the advantages of preserved bone stock, less stress shielding, eliminating the diaphyseal stress riser, easier implant removal at revision, and humeral component placement independent from the humeral diaphyseal axis. Nowadays, surgeons try to balance the need for a stable fixation of the humeral component with the potential need for revision surgery. Complications of revision shoulder arthroplasty are related to the need for removing a well-fixed humeral stem, the length of the procedure, and the need to treat severe bone loss.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone preservation; Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty; Revision surgery; Short stems; Shoulder resurfacing; Stemless shoulder replacement; Total shoulder arthroplasty

Year:  2022        PMID: 36258746      PMCID: PMC9569137          DOI: 10.22038/ABJS.2021.53555.2664

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg        ISSN: 2345-461X


  58 in total

Review 1.  Total shoulder arthroplasty in the young patient.

Authors:  P R Hayes; E L Flatow
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  2001

Review 2.  Problems, complications, reoperations, and revisions in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Matthias A Zumstein; Miguel Pinedo; Jason Old; Pascal Boileau
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 3.  Grammont reverse prosthesis: design, rationale, and biomechanics.

Authors:  Pascal Boileau; Duncan J Watkinson; Armodios M Hatzidakis; Frederic Balg
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  Humeral windows and longitudinal splits for component removal in revision shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Shawn Sahota; John W Sperling; Robert H Cofield
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty as a salvage procedure for failed conventional shoulder replacement due to cuff failure--midterm results.

Authors:  Matthias P Flury; Philipp Frey; Joerg Goldhahn; Hans-Kaspar Schwyzer; Beat R Simmen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-03-14       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  An evaluation of the radiological changes around the Grammont reverse geometry shoulder arthroplasty after eight to 12 years.

Authors:  B Melis; M DeFranco; A Lädermann; D Molé; L Favard; C Nérot; C Maynou; G Walch
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2011-09

7.  Radiolucency in stemless shoulder arthroplasty is associated with an imaging phenomenon.

Authors:  Robert Hudek; Birgit Werner; Ayman F Abdelkawi; Rainer Schmitt; Frank Gohlke
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  Humeral head prosthetic arthroplasty: Surgically relevant geometric considerations.

Authors:  F T Ballmer; J A Sidles; S B Lippitt; F A Matsen
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 3.019

9.  Humeral fixation by press-fitting of a tapered metaphyseal stem: a prospective radiographic study.

Authors:  Frederick A Matsen; Joseph P Iannotti; Charles A Rockwood
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Cup arthroplasty of the rheumatoid shoulder.

Authors:  E Jónsson; N Egund; I Kelly; U Rydholm; L Lidgren
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1986-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.