Literature DB >> 26920937

Stimulus intensity modulates multisensory temporal processing.

Juliane Krueger Fister1, Ryan A Stevenson2, Aaron R Nidiffer3, Zachary P Barnett3, Mark T Wallace4.   

Abstract

One of the more challenging feats that multisensory systems must perform is to determine which sensory signals originate from the same external event, and thus should be integrated or "bound" into a singular perceptual object or event, and which signals should be segregated. Two important stimulus properties impacting this process are the timing and effectiveness of the paired stimuli. It has been well established that the more temporally aligned two stimuli are, the greater the degree to which they influence one another's processing. In addition, the less effective the individual unisensory stimuli are in eliciting a response, the greater the benefit when they are combined. However, the interaction between stimulus timing and stimulus effectiveness in driving multisensory-mediated behaviors has never been explored - which was the purpose of the current study. Participants were presented with either high- or low-intensity audiovisual stimuli in which stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) were parametrically varied, and were asked to report on the perceived synchrony/asynchrony of the paired stimuli. Our results revealed an interaction between the temporal relationship (SOA) and intensity of the stimuli. Specifically, individuals were more tolerant of larger temporal offsets (i.e., more likely to call them synchronous) when the paired stimuli were less effective. This interaction was also seen in response time (RT) distributions. Behavioral gains in RTs were seen with synchronous relative to asynchronous presentations, but this effect was more pronounced with high-intensity stimuli. These data suggest that stimulus effectiveness plays an underappreciated role in the perception of the timing of multisensory events, and reinforces the interdependency of the principles of multisensory integration in determining behavior and shaping perception.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Audiovisual; Cross-modal; Inverse effectiveness; Multisensory; Perception; Synchrony

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26920937      PMCID: PMC4958503          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.02.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  111 in total

1.  The role of spatial disparity and hemifields in audio-visual temporal order judgments.

Authors:  Mirjam Keetels; Jean Vroomen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-09-21       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Altered temporal profile of visual-auditory multisensory interactions in dyslexia.

Authors:  W David Hairston; Jonathan H Burdette; D Lynn Flowers; Frank B Wood; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-19       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  [Reaction time and temporal serial judgment: corroboration or dissociation?].

Authors:  O Neumann; R Koch; M Niepel; T Tappe
Journal:  Z Exp Angew Psychol       Date:  1992

4.  Evidence for diminished multisensory integration in autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Ryan A Stevenson; Justin K Siemann; Tiffany G Woynaroski; Brittany C Schneider; Haley E Eberly; Stephen M Camarata; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2014-12

5.  Correlation between audio-visual enhancement of speech in different noise environments and SNR: a combined behavioral and electrophysiological study.

Authors:  B Liu; Y Lin; X Gao; J Dang
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2013-05-11       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 6.  The construct of the multisensory temporal binding window and its dysregulation in developmental disabilities.

Authors:  Mark T Wallace; Ryan A Stevenson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Individual differences in the multisensory temporal binding window predict susceptibility to audiovisual illusions.

Authors:  Ryan A Stevenson; Raquel K Zemtsov; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Binding of sights and sounds: age-related changes in multisensory temporal processing.

Authors:  Andrea R Hillock; Albert R Powers; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-12-04       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 9.  Development and plasticity of intra- and intersensory information processing.

Authors:  Daniel B Polley; Andrea R Hillock; Christopher Spankovich; Maria V Popescu; David W Royal; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.664

10.  Keeping in touch with the visual system: spatial alignment and multisensory integration of visual-somatosensory inputs.

Authors:  Jeannette R Mahoney; Sophie Molholm; John S Butler; Pejman Sehatpour; Manuel Gomez-Ramirez; Walter Ritter; John J Foxe
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-05
View more
  20 in total

1.  Links between temporal acuity and multisensory integration across life span.

Authors:  Ryan A Stevenson; Sarah H Baum; Juliane Krueger; Paul A Newhouse; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  The associations between multisensory temporal processing and symptoms of schizophrenia.

Authors:  Ryan A Stevenson; Sohee Park; Channing Cochran; Lindsey G McIntosh; Jean-Paul Noel; Morgan D Barense; Susanne Ferber; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Stimulus duration has little effect on auditory, visual and audiovisual temporal order judgement.

Authors:  Kaisa Tiippana; Viljami R Salmela
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Relationship between vestibular sensitivity and multisensory temporal integration.

Authors:  Corey S Shayman; Jae-Hyun Seo; Yonghee Oh; Richard F Lewis; Robert J Peterka; Timothy E Hullar
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Multisensory Integration in Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Ryan A Stevenson; Sterling W Sheffield; Iliza M Butera; René H Gifford; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Visual field differences in temporal synchrony processing for audio-visual stimuli.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Takeshima
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Resolution of impaired multisensory processing in autism and the cost of switching sensory modality.

Authors:  Michael J Crosse; John J Foxe; Katy Tarrit; Edward G Freedman; Sophie Molholm
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2022-06-30

8.  Interactions between space and effectiveness in human multisensory performance.

Authors:  Aaron R Nidiffer; Ryan A Stevenson; Juliane Krueger Fister; Zachary P Barnett; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Task-dependent audiovisual temporal sensitivity is not affected by stimulus intensity levels.

Authors:  Alexandra N Scurry; Zachary Lovelady; Fang Jiang
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Shifts in Audiovisual Processing in Healthy Aging.

Authors:  Sarah H Baum; Ryan Stevenson
Journal:  Curr Behav Neurosci Rep       Date:  2017-08-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.