Literature DB >> 34058622

Task-dependent audiovisual temporal sensitivity is not affected by stimulus intensity levels.

Alexandra N Scurry1, Zachary Lovelady2, Fang Jiang2.   

Abstract

Flexibility and robustness of multisensory temporal recalibration is paramount for maintaining perceptual constancy of the surrounding natural world. Different environments impart various impediments, distances and routes that alter the propagation times of sight and sound cues comprising a multimodal event. One's ability to rapidly calibrate and account for these external variations allows for maintained perception of synchrony which is crucial for coherent and consistent perception. The two common paradigms used to compare precision of temporal processing between experimental and control groups, the simultaneity judgment (SJ) and temporal order judgment (TOJ) tasks, often use supra-threshold stimuli. However, few studies have specifically examined the effects of normalizing stimulus intensities to participant's unisensory detection thresholds. The current project presented multiple combinations of auditory and visual stimulus intensity levels, based on individual detection thresholds, during a TOJ and a SJ task. While no effect of stimulus intensity was found on temporal sensitivity or perceived temporal synchrony, there was a significant difference in point of subjective simultaneity (PSS) measures between tasks. In addition, PSS estimates were audio-leading, rather than visual-leading as previously reported, suggesting that exposure to the particular combinations of stimulus intensity levels used influenced temporal synchrony perception. Overall, these results support the use of supra-threshold stimuli in TOJ and SJ tasks as a way of minimizing the confound from differences in unisensory processing.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Multisensory perception; Temporal sensitivity; Temporal synchrony

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34058622      PMCID: PMC8273142          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2021.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  36 in total

1.  Aging and the processing of sound duration in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Jodi M Ostroff; Kelly L McDonald; Bruce A Schneider; Claude Alain
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  When is now? Perception of simultaneity.

Authors:  J V Stone; N M Hunkin; J Porrill; R Wood; V Keeler; M Beanland; M Port; N R Porter
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Effects of age and sex on pattern electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  G G Celesia; D Kaufman; S Cone
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1987-05

4.  Auditory frequency perception adapts rapidly to the immediate past.

Authors:  David Alais; Emily Orchard-Mills; Erik Van der Burg
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Atypical rapid audio-visual temporal recalibration in autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Jean-Paul Noel; Matthew A De Niear; Ryan Stevenson; David Alais; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  Autism Res       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 5.216

6.  Recalibration of audiovisual simultaneity.

Authors:  Waka Fujisaki; Shinsuke Shimojo; Makio Kashino; Shin'ya Nishida
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-06-13       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Age-related variations in evoked potentials to auditory stimuli in normal human subjects.

Authors:  D S Goodin; K C Squires; B H Henderson; A Starr
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1978-04

8.  Rapid recalibration to audiovisual asynchrony follows the physical-not the perceived-temporal order.

Authors:  Erik Van der Burg; David Alais; John Cass
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 9.  The JASP guidelines for conducting and reporting a Bayesian analysis.

Authors:  Johnny van Doorn; Don van den Bergh; Udo Böhm; Fabian Dablander; Koen Derks; Tim Draws; Alexander Etz; Nathan J Evans; Quentin F Gronau; Julia M Haaf; Max Hinne; Šimon Kucharský; Alexander Ly; Maarten Marsman; Dora Matzke; Akash R Komarlu Narendra Gupta; Alexandra Sarafoglou; Angelika Stefan; Jan G Voelkel; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-06

10.  Audiovisual temporal recalibration occurs independently at two different time scales.

Authors:  Erik Van der Burg; David Alais; John Cass
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.