Literature DB >> 26920145

Abdominal ultrasound examination training using an ultrasound phantom and volume navigation system.

Chizu Uetake1, Akihiro Nakamoto1, Toshikuni Suda1, Masaya Tamano2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of using an ultrasound phantom (ECHOZY) and a volume navigation system (Vnavi) in abdominal ultrasonography training for young residents.
METHODS: Nine third-year residents underwent abdominal ultrasonography training: controls, comprising five residents; and the ECHOZY + Vnavi group, comprising four residents. Residents were trained in abdominal ultrasound examinations using both educational videos and hands-on clinical training. The ECHOZY + Vnavi group also received training using an ultrasound phantom and volume navigation system. The time needed for abdominal ultrasound examination was calculated at 4 months (early), 8 months (middle), and 12 months (late) after starting training. The ability of each resident to visualize 20 abdominal structures on normal patients was also evaluated retrospectively.
RESULTS: In the early period, the ECHOZY + Vnavi group needed significantly longer to complete examinations than controls (545 ± 125 s versus 392 ± 81 s, p < 0.01), but showed significantly better ability scores (17.5 ± 0.6 versus 13.4 ± 1.1, p < 0.05). Both these differences disappeared by the middle period (338 ± 107 s versus 259 ± 130 s and 17.8 ± 0.5 versus 16.0 ± 0.7).
CONCLUSION: In spite of longer examination times, training residents in abdominal ultrasonography using an ultrasound phantom and volume navigation system may be useful in the early period.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ultrasound education; Ultrasound phantoms; Volume navigation systems

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26920145     DOI: 10.1007/s10396-016-0706-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)        ISSN: 1346-4523            Impact factor:   1.314


  14 in total

1.  The status of bedside ultrasonography training in emergency medicine residency programs.

Authors:  Francis L Counselman; Arthur Sanders; Corey M Slovis; Daniel Danzl; Louis S Binder; Debra G Perina
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.451

2.  Ultrasound simulators: experience with the SonoTrainer and comparative review of other training systems.

Authors:  H Maul; A Scharf; P Baier; M Wüstemann; H H Günter; G Gebauer; C Sohn
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 7.299

3.  A teaching phantom for sonographers.

Authors:  J A Zagzebski; E L Madsen; G R Frank
Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 0.910

4.  Ultrasound exposure during gross anatomy.

Authors:  Stephanie M Dreher; Robert DePhilip; David Bahner
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 1.484

5.  Abdominal ultrasound and medical education.

Authors:  G García de Casasola Sánchez; J Torres Macho; J M Casas Rojo; P Cubo Romano; J M Antón Santos; V Villena Garrido; R Diez Lobato
Journal:  Rev Clin Esp (Barc)       Date:  2013-10-26

Review 6.  Real-time image fusion for successful percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Toshikuni; Mikihiro Tsutsumi; Yoshitaka Takuma; Tomiyasu Arisawa
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.153

7.  Using real-time ultrasound to teach living anatomy: an alternative model for large classes.

Authors:  Mark D Stringer; Lynda J Duncan; Latika Samalia
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  2012-09-07

Review 8.  Usefulness of the multimodality fusion imaging for the diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Yuki Makino; Yasuharu Imai; Takumi Igura; Hideko Ohama; Sachiyo Kogita; Yoshiyuki Sawai; Kazuto Fukuda; Hiroshi Ohashi; Takamichi Murakami
Journal:  Dig Dis       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 2.404

9.  Efficacy of fusion imaging combining sonography and hepatobiliary phase MRI with Gd-EOB-DTPA to detect small hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Yosuke Kunishi; Kazushi Numata; Manabu Morimoto; Masahiro Okada; Tetsuji Kaneko; Shin Maeda; Katsuaki Tanaka
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Simulation of abdomen sonography. Evaluation of a new ultrasound simulator.

Authors:  C Terkamp; G Kirchner; J Wedemeyer; A Dettmer; J Kielstein; H Reindell; J Bleck; M Manns; M Gebel
Journal:  Ultraschall Med       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.548

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.