OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the efficacy of fusion imaging that fuses conventional sonography images with hepatobiliary phase contrast-enhanced MR images obtained with gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) as the reference image for the detection of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Eighty-seven HCCs with a maximum diameter of between 1 and 3 cm at the time of diagnosis were enrolled in this prospective study. We compared the detection rates of HCCs using three sonography modalities: conventional sonography, late phase of contrast-enhanced sonography with Sonazoid, and fusion imaging combining conventional sonography and the hepatobiliary phase of contrast-enhanced MRI with Gd-EOB-DTPA as the reference image. The comparisons were made using the McNemar test. RESULTS: The detection rate of HCCs using fusion imaging (98%, 85/87) was significantly higher than the detection rates using conventional sonography (76%, 66/87) and contrast-enhanced sonography (83%, 72/87) (p<0.01, for both). For small HCCs (maximum diameter, 1-2 cm), the detection rate using fusion imaging (97%, 59/61) was also significantly higher than those using conventional sonography (66%, 40/61) and contrast-enhanced sonography (80%, 49/61) (p<0.01, for both). The detection rate for atypical HCCs was also significantly higher using fusion imaging (95%, 18/19) than using conventional sonography (53%, 10/19) and contrast-enhanced sonography (26%, 5/19) (p<0.01, for both). CONCLUSION: Fusion imaging combining conventional sonography and the hepatobiliary phase of contrast-enhanced MRI with Gd-EOB-DTPA is more sensitive than conventional sonography or contrast-enhanced sonography for detecting HCCs, especially small or atypical HCCs.
OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the efficacy of fusion imaging that fuses conventional sonography images with hepatobiliary phase contrast-enhanced MR images obtained with gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) as the reference image for the detection of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Eighty-seven HCCs with a maximum diameter of between 1 and 3 cm at the time of diagnosis were enrolled in this prospective study. We compared the detection rates of HCCs using three sonography modalities: conventional sonography, late phase of contrast-enhanced sonography with Sonazoid, and fusion imaging combining conventional sonography and the hepatobiliary phase of contrast-enhanced MRI with Gd-EOB-DTPA as the reference image. The comparisons were made using the McNemar test. RESULTS: The detection rate of HCCs using fusion imaging (98%, 85/87) was significantly higher than the detection rates using conventional sonography (76%, 66/87) and contrast-enhanced sonography (83%, 72/87) (p<0.01, for both). For small HCCs (maximum diameter, 1-2 cm), the detection rate using fusion imaging (97%, 59/61) was also significantly higher than those using conventional sonography (66%, 40/61) and contrast-enhanced sonography (80%, 49/61) (p<0.01, for both). The detection rate for atypical HCCs was also significantly higher using fusion imaging (95%, 18/19) than using conventional sonography (53%, 10/19) and contrast-enhanced sonography (26%, 5/19) (p<0.01, for both). CONCLUSION: Fusion imaging combining conventional sonography and the hepatobiliary phase of contrast-enhanced MRI with Gd-EOB-DTPA is more sensitive than conventional sonography or contrast-enhanced sonography for detecting HCCs, especially small or atypical HCCs.