Literature DB >> 15386609

Ultrasound simulators: experience with the SonoTrainer and comparative review of other training systems.

H Maul1, A Scharf, P Baier, M Wüstemann, H H Günter, G Gebauer, C Sohn.   

Abstract

Ultrasound has become indispensable in prenatal diagnosis. Ultrasound training, however, still lacks proper quality assessment and control. Moreover, most fetal anomalies which must be diagnosed during pregnancy are extremely rare. Ultrasound simulators could provide an opportunity to overcome this dilemma. This review summarizes the potential benefits of simulator-based ultrasound training, briefly describes the properties of a variety of ultrasound simulators that have been developed for various applications including prenatal diagnosis, and presents the SonoTrainer sonography simulation system which makes it possible to run a real-time simulation of a complete prenatal ultrasound examination. We evaluated the system for the training of first- and second-trimester screening for both normal and pathological findings and found that physicians who received theoretical training and were additionally trained with the simulator (T + S) significantly improved their skills in measurements of nuchal translucency thickness (NT) and crown-rump length (CRL) as compared with colleagues who only underwent theoretical instruction (T) [mean +/- SD NT deviation: 0.31 +/- 0.1 mm (T + S) vs. 0.62 +/- 0.2 mm (T), P < 0.05; mean +/- SD CRL deviation: 1.48 +/- 2.0 mm (T + S) vs. 3.27 +/- 2.5 (T), P < 0.05]. Simulator-based training enabled physicians to diagnose rare fetal anomalies in the second trimester with a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 100%. In a study in which second-trimester scans including fetal anomalies were presented to physicians, 96% of the participants subjectively estimated their training effect as being good. We therefore conclude that simulator-based training would provide an ideal educational tool to test, improve and monitor a physician's or technician's ultrasound skills in detecting fetal anomalies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15386609     DOI: 10.1002/uog.1119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  16 in total

1.  Ultrasound simulation with deformable and patient-specific scatterer maps.

Authors:  Rastislav Starkov; Lin Zhang; Michael Bajka; Christine Tanner; Orcun Goksel
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Abdominal ultrasound examination training using an ultrasound phantom and volume navigation system.

Authors:  Chizu Uetake; Akihiro Nakamoto; Toshikuni Suda; Masaya Tamano
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 1.314

3.  Effects of simulation for gynaecological ultrasound scan training: a systematic review.

Authors:  Natalie Jane Woodhead; Ayesha Mahmud; Justin Clark
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2020-11-01

4.  Validation of a virtual reality simulator for the use of transvaginal ultrasonography in gynaecology and early pregnancy.

Authors:  Maya Al-Memar; Srdjan Saso; Shabnam Bobdiwala; Lieveke Ameye; Sharmistha Guha; Karen Joash; Catriona Stalder; Shyamaly Sur; Krishen Moorthy; Dirk Timmerman; Tom Bourne
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2017-05-30

5.  The effectiveness of simulation training in the teaching of skills required for sonographic fetal assessment in mid-trimester pregnancy to novices: A pilot study.

Authors:  Brooke Osborne; Kerry Thoirs; Nayana Parange
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2016-09-27

6.  Integration of 3-Dimensional/4-Dimensional Ultrasound Technology into Undergraduate Medical Education: Student Perception of Innovative Obstetrics Education.

Authors:  Shannon McAllister; Seth McIntire; Tatyana Kondrashova
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb

7.  Sustained effect of simulation-based ultrasound training on clinical performance: a randomized trial.

Authors:  M G Tolsgaard; C Ringsted; E Dreisler; L N Nørgaard; J H Petersen; M E Madsen; N L C Freiesleben; J L Sørensen; A Tabor
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 7.299

8.  Patient-Specific Polyvinyl Alcohol Phantom Fabrication with Ultrasound and X-Ray Contrast for Brain Tumor Surgery Planning.

Authors:  Eleanor C Mackle; Jonathan Shapey; Efthymios Maneas; Shakeel R Saeed; Robert Bradford; Sebastien Ourselin; Tom Vercauteren; Adrien E Desjardins
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 1.355

9.  Are Live Ultrasound Models Replaceable? Traditional versus Simulated Education Module for FAST Exam.

Authors:  Suzanne Bentley; Gurpreet Mudan; Christopher Strother; Nelson Wong
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2015-10-22

10.  Fast and automatic ultrasound simulation from CT images.

Authors:  Weijian Cong; Jian Yang; Yue Liu; Yongtian Wang
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 2.238

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.