Literature DB >> 26913778

The effects of alphabet and expertise on letter perception.

Robert W Wiley1, Colin Wilson1, Brenda Rapp1.   

Abstract

Long-standing questions in human perception concern the nature of the visual features that underlie letter recognition and the extent to which the visual processing of letters is affected by differences in alphabets and levels of viewer expertise. We examined these issues in a novel approach using a same-different judgment task on pairs of letters from the Arabic alphabet with 2 participant groups: 1 with no prior exposure to Arabic and 1 with reading proficiency. Hierarchical clustering and linear mixed-effects modeling of reaction times and accuracy provide evidence that both the specific characteristics of the alphabet and observers' previous experience with it affect how letters are perceived and visually processed. The findings of this research further our understanding of the multiple factors that affect letter perception and support the view of a visual system that dynamically adjusts its weighting of visual features as expert readers come to more efficiently and effectively discriminate the letters of the specific alphabet they are viewing. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26913778      PMCID: PMC4980158          DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  50 in total

1.  Perceptual learning in visual search generalizes over tasks, locations, and eyes.

Authors:  R Sireteanu; R Rettenbach
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  How learning to read changes the cortical networks for vision and language.

Authors:  Stanislas Dehaene; Felipe Pegado; Lucia W Braga; Paulo Ventura; Gilberto Nunes Filho; Antoinette Jobert; Ghislaine Dehaene-Lambertz; Régine Kolinsky; José Morais; Laurent Cohen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Visuo-spatial representations of the alphabet in synaesthetes and non-synaesthetes.

Authors:  Clare N Jonas; Alisdair J G Taylor; Sam Hutton; Peter H Weiss; Jamie Ward
Journal:  J Neuropsychol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.864

4.  Effects of number, complexity, and familiarity of flankers on crowded letter identification.

Authors:  Myriam Chanceaux; Sebastiaan Mathôt; Jonathan Grainger
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  A letter visual-similarity matrix for Latin-based alphabets.

Authors:  Ian C Simpson; Petroula Mousikou; Juan Manuel Montoya; Sylvia Defior
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2013-06

6.  Identification confusions among letters of the alphabet.

Authors:  M J Gervais; L O Harvey; J O Roberts
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  From graphemes to abstract letter shapes: levels of representation in written spelling.

Authors:  B Rapp; A Caramazza
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  The similarity structure of distributed neural responses reveals the multiple representations of letters.

Authors:  David Rothlein; Brenda Rapp
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  When writing impairs reading: letter perception's susceptibility to motor interference.

Authors:  Karin H James; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2009-08

Review 10.  Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy.

Authors:  Edward Awh; Artem V Belopolsky; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 20.229

View more
  16 in total

1.  How orthographic-specific characteristics shape letter position coding: The case of Thai script.

Authors:  Manuel Perea; Heather Winskel; Pablo Gomez
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-02

2.  Learning representation hierarchies by sharing visual features: a computational investigation of Persian character recognition with unsupervised deep learning.

Authors:  Zahra Sadeghi; Alberto Testolin
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2017-02-25

3.  Is nevtral NEUTRAL? Visual similarity effects in the early phases of written-word recognition.

Authors:  Ana Marcet; Manuel Perea
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

4.  Evidence for cross-script abstract identities in learners of Japanese kana.

Authors:  Teresa Schubert; Roderick Gawthrop; Sachiko Kinoshita
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-08

5.  The role of allograph representations in font-invariant letter identification.

Authors:  David Rothlein; Brenda Rapp
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  From complexity to distinctiveness: The effect of expertise on letter perception.

Authors:  Robert W Wiley; Brenda Rapp
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-06

7.  Factors Influencing the Accurate Identification of Written Minimal Pairs with Graphemic Similarity: Evidence from Persian-Speaking Children and Adults.

Authors:  Sepideh Arab; Mahmood Bijankhan; Marziye Eshghi
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2022-05-29

8.  Transposed letter priming effects and allographic variation in Arabic: Insights from lexical decision and the same-different task.

Authors:  Sami Boudelaa; Dennis Norris; Abdesattar Mahfoudhi; Sachiko Kinoshita
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Matrices of the frequency and similarity of Arabic letters and allographs.

Authors:  Sami Boudelaa; Manuel Perea; Manuel Carreiras
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2020-10

10.  The Effects of Handwriting Experience on Literacy Learning.

Authors:  Robert W Wiley; Brenda Rapp
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-06-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.