Literature DB >> 35644895

Factors Influencing the Accurate Identification of Written Minimal Pairs with Graphemic Similarity: Evidence from Persian-Speaking Children and Adults.

Sepideh Arab1, Mahmood Bijankhan2, Marziye Eshghi3.   

Abstract

In this study, we compared children's and adults' ability to accurately identify target words in written minimal pairs (WMPs) with graphemically similar letters while accounting for factors such as gender, similarity of the middle letter in WMPs, mono- versus dimorphemic WMPs, number of syllable, homography, and imageability. Fifty children and fifty adults were exposed to a distractor stimulus as a pre-mask, followed by the target, and then a post-mask stimulus. Subsequently, the corresponding WMPs including the target word and its graphemically minimal contrast were presented to the participants to obtain their reaction time (RT) in accurately identifying the target word. Results demonstrated that children tend to slow down their reaction as a compensatory strategy to circumvent their less mature knowledge of graphophonic units/morphemes to achieve accuracy during word recognition. In addition, among all controlled factors, children's RT was significantly influenced by similarity of the middle letter in the WMPs. Adults' RT, however, was influenced by factors such as gender, similarity of the middle letter in WMPs, and homography.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Grapheme; Letter identification; Morphology; Reaction time; Written minimal pair

Year:  2022        PMID: 35644895     DOI: 10.1007/s10936-022-09890-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res        ISSN: 0090-6905


  15 in total

1.  What's new in visual masking?

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a morpheme level? Evidence for morpho-orthographic decomposition.

Authors:  Jon Andoni Duñabeitia; Manuel Perea; Manuel Carreiras
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-01-10

Review 3.  Letter perception: from pixels to pandemonium.

Authors:  Jonathan Grainger; Arnaud Rey; Stéphane Dufau
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Three cognitive markers of unconscious semantic activation.

Authors:  A G Greenwald; S C Draine; R L Abrams
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-09-20       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Is nevtral NEUTRAL? Visual similarity effects in the early phases of written-word recognition.

Authors:  Ana Marcet; Manuel Perea
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

Review 6.  Alphabetic letter identification: effects of perceivability, similarity, and bias.

Authors:  Shane T Mueller; Christoph T Weidemann
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2011-10-26

7.  Can I order a burger at rnacdonalds.com? Visual similarity effects of multi-letter combinations at the early stages of word recognition.

Authors:  Ana Marcet; Manuel Perea
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Spelling transparency and its impact on dyslexic and unimpaired children's memory for words.

Authors:  Bahman Baluch; Maryam Danaye-Tousi
Journal:  Ann Dyslexia       Date:  2006-12

9.  Matrices of the frequency and similarity of Arabic letters and allographs.

Authors:  Sami Boudelaa; Manuel Perea; Manuel Carreiras
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2020-10

10.  Morphological effects in visual word recognition: Children, adolescents, and adults.

Authors:  Nicola Dawson; Kathleen Rastle; Jessie Ricketts
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.